Mar 9, 2014 #5 Rumble Gang formerly retrohead182 7,981 4,083 Joined Oct 6, 2013 need better closer pics. closeup on the mesh, emblem, insole, tongue w/o the flash
Mar 10, 2014 #6 dino23 77 23 Joined Feb 20, 2013 Rumble Gang it's a listing I'm looking at on eBay. They seem suspect and especially so since the pics you asked for are not in the listing.
Rumble Gang it's a listing I'm looking at on eBay. They seem suspect and especially so since the pics you asked for are not in the listing.
Mar 10, 2014 #7 Rumble Gang formerly retrohead182 7,981 4,083 Joined Oct 6, 2013 Then you simply ask the seller for more pics... If they are reluctant to post more then don't even bother
Then you simply ask the seller for more pics... If they are reluctant to post more then don't even bother
Mar 10, 2014 #8 from88til 5,692 1,762 Joined Jan 6, 2014 Don't need any more pics. These are 100% fakes. Soles are way too clear, mesh is wrong, shade of yellow is wrong, tongue shouldn't reflect that bright with flash..
Don't need any more pics. These are 100% fakes. Soles are way too clear, mesh is wrong, shade of yellow is wrong, tongue shouldn't reflect that bright with flash..
Mar 10, 2014 #9 dino23 77 23 Joined Feb 20, 2013 Thanks for all the help guys. [emoji]128077[/emoji][emoji]128077[/emoji]
Mar 10, 2014 #10 N nykickstape 1,288 320 Joined Feb 21, 2014 These are GM -The real netting on Shangs is more milky, while these are a grey color -The emblem on the side looks really lazy and leaves a lot of black space -The Soles are way too clear and missing any kind of blue tint
These are GM -The real netting on Shangs is more milky, while these are a grey color -The emblem on the side looks really lazy and leaves a lot of black space -The Soles are way too clear and missing any kind of blue tint
Mar 10, 2014 #11 from88til 5,692 1,762 Joined Jan 6, 2014 I wouldn't even consider them GM's these are way off.