Lindsey Lohan reveals the names of celebrities who have slept with her (big list)

Even the genetics of athleticism is a touchy subject, but it's interesting that people who dismiss the biological and genetic basis of genetics would be the first to brag about how their race has more athletic genes.

A genetic basis for intelligence and race seems plausible and is likely but needs further proof to support the claim

speaking on speculation/hypothesis as fact......?

ohhhhhhh... i think i see your strategy here...

stuffliberalshate :lol:
 
Last edited:
 
Even the genetics of athleticism is a touchy subject, but it's interesting that people who dismiss the biological and genetic basis of genetics would be the first to brag about how their race has more athletic genes.
Yea, it's the same people that brag about their vertical leap or how fast they can run the 40 but when it comes to standardized testing time they complain and moan when other students outperform them and state that the test is biased against them. Perhaps, reading and verbal scores are slightly biased but you cannot argue against basic logical reasoning and math skills be testing. It's a simple fact that some people or rather a large clustering group of people have a different genotype that yield a different cognitive profile from other groups as shown by the picture I posted before.
 
It's a simple fact that some people or rather a large clustering group of people have a different genotype that yield a different cognitive profile from other groups as shown by the picture I posted before.

is that proven to be genetic or socioeconomic?
source?
 
why don't she do a porno and sell it to vivid video or release an old tape i'm sure its out there
 
Last edited:
source?


did you learn how to support a hypothesis?


see, the articles I posted. I'm not going to read them for you.

stuffliberalsdhate copy paste + broken links = invalid sources

are you genuinely hurt by what i said so you resort to grasping at anything on the internet to counter me?

or do you actually believe what you are posting....

if you believe in your viewpoint why post links to studies you don't actually cite and the links that don't even work?
 
Last edited:
Lion, just log off fit a week and then come back when this is all forgotten.


Your fake sources stunt is just pathetic
 
is that proven to be genetic or socioeconomic?
source?
As I stated earlier, a complete proof of intelligence and race hasn't been presented but we are heading that way. Some supporting evidence outside of genomics that lends to this argument is the performance on cognitive tasks such as forward and backwards digit span interactions considering race and socionomic conditions http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/edu/67/6/882/
 
  1. From A. Jensen's 1969 2-level theory of mental disabilities (Level I: rote learning and memory; Level II: complex cognitive processing) it was predicted that forward digit span (FDS) should correlate less with IQ than backward digit span (BDS), and age and race should interact with FDS-BDS, with the FDS-BDS difference decreasing as a junction of age and a greater White-Black difference in BDS than in FDS. The predictions were substantiated at a high level of significance in large representative samples of 669 White and 622 Black 5-12 yr olds who were given the revised WISC. Socioeconomic differences accounted for less of the predicted effects than race. (25 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
 
TLRDX91 doesnt seem to have trouble. :\

He is posting inconclusive studies and hypothesis that don't place any racial/IQ correlation as fact...

even his last quote leads to the author of the study disputing the widely perceived conclusion of the study

...nowhere have I "claimed" an "innate deficiency" of intelligence in blacks. My position on this question is clearly spelled out in my most recent book: "The plain fact is that at present there exists no scientifically satisfactory explanation for the differences between the IQ distributions in the black and white populations. The only genuine consensus among well-informed scientists on this topic is that the cause of the difference remains an open question." (Jensen, 1981a, p. 213)

lionblood, what college did you goto? how can you not understand the scientific process and how to read cited studies?
 
Last edited:
U do realize some of those articles don't necessarily come to the conclusion that African Americans underachieving is genetic. It's a very comprehensive collection of many arguments and some counterarguments about intelligence and race. The point of that page is to show people that it is something worthwhile researching  evenwith the taboo associated with it. Some did conclude that there is some evidence associating genetics, intelligence and race but more studies need to be conducted. Like everything in science it is still a work in progress, but because of the nature of the subject it isn't easy.


Dude sifted through the articles and chose what supports his own biased agenda. It's a 2 way street bro. People like you are afraid of what may be discovered if this type of research received more funding.

you copy and pasted from stuffliberalshate and you didn't cite any reference....

c'mon...what college did you learn this from?
 
CreateDestroy and BLASTERCOMBO, these articles will probably sway you towards what me and LIONBLOOD have been saying unless you guys are really that afraid of reality sinking in.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3148850/
http://cnpru.bsd.uchicago.edu/PDFs/Rowe_1999_ChildDev_GxE_VIQ.pdf

What do I have to do with this conversation?? Leave me out of it please. I came here to see the LL sex list. Y'all came in to argue and race.

Sad thing is both those topics are for whatever reason, in the same thread :smh:

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Ox man I love you for that PS
roll.gif
roll.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ox.
Back
Top Bottom