- 2,161
- 12
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2009
Has anybody tried these shoes for ball yet? How does it compare to other low-top shoes such as Kobe IVs? Traction? Fit?
Thanks in advance for any information, guys! Oh and sorry if a thread was already made.
Nike Air Cradle Rock Low review request?
- Thread in 'Sneaker Reviews' Thread starter Started by razzle dazzle,
- Start date
Has anybody tried these shoes for ball yet? How does it compare to other low-top shoes such as Kobe IVs? Traction? Fit?
Thanks in advance for any information, guys! Oh and sorry if a thread was already made.
- 266
- 10
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2009
They haven't been released yet.
- 477
- 10
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2004
They've been out in Canada for a while now, White, Black, and the colorway above...
Tried them on, the definitely feel like dunks, cushioning not to bad for such minimal material. True to size. Hella light. Kinda rough around the toe box notto much padding around the shoe. Traction mediocre. Just first thoughts from trying them on, but its a pass for me.
Retail was $99.99 Canadian by the way.
Tried them on, the definitely feel like dunks, cushioning not to bad for such minimal material. True to size. Hella light. Kinda rough around the toe box notto much padding around the shoe. Traction mediocre. Just first thoughts from trying them on, but its a pass for me.
Retail was $99.99 Canadian by the way.
ssgefiestoakagerger
Banned
- 755
- 10
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2007
^ Yup, Sportchek.
http://www.sportchek.ca/s...Id=103&styleId=60408
Code6 pretty much sums it up right there. As I've made a post about these in the Nike forum, they're not in the same league as the ZKIV. Hellthey're not even comparable to the zoom bb lows (random shoes popping up at mom and pop stores lately).
http://www.sportchek.ca/s...Id=103&styleId=60408
Code6 pretty much sums it up right there. As I've made a post about these in the Nike forum, they're not in the same league as the ZKIV. Hellthey're not even comparable to the zoom bb lows (random shoes popping up at mom and pop stores lately).
- 2,161
- 12
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2009
Cool, good looking out guys
- 34
- 10
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2009
ive got my pair a few days ago.
cant play in them since im recovering from a big injury (torn ligament from a hectik sprain from zoom mvps oh the irony)
i can write a review later on but after my initially wearing out of the box they are darn comfy to walk around in.
cant play in them since im recovering from a big injury (torn ligament from a hectik sprain from zoom mvps oh the irony)
i can write a review later on but after my initially wearing out of the box they are darn comfy to walk around in.
- 376
- 13
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2006
Sprained ankle for Nash...
- 3,291
- 12
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2009
im no expert in reviews so i'll just do a very simple comparison with the zoom mvps
first of all these are cut very low (lowest among low tops ive played in)
the cushioning set up is average, something like cusilon
fit is average too, the tongue of the shoe is extra padded btw
traction is way better than the mvps
pinky toes rubbed hard on the sides of the shoe, but i expect them to disappear after a few more wears
overall id still choose these over the mvps because of the traction
though the fit of the mvp is better, the cradle rocks arent that far behind.
plus the crade rocks look better too!
hope this helps!
first of all these are cut very low (lowest among low tops ive played in)
the cushioning set up is average, something like cusilon
fit is average too, the tongue of the shoe is extra padded btw
traction is way better than the mvps
pinky toes rubbed hard on the sides of the shoe, but i expect them to disappear after a few more wears
overall id still choose these over the mvps because of the traction
though the fit of the mvp is better, the cradle rocks arent that far behind.
plus the crade rocks look better too!
hope this helps!
