- 546
- 61
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2013
Would not be surprised at the $220 pricing. Remember, the '88 WC3s with Nike Air were priced at $200. Add in the $20 "remastered" premium, and you're right there at $220.
Nike Air Jordan 4 Retro "White/Cement" - The Aftermath - NO BUYING/SELLING/TRADING
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by kennmo08,
- Start date
- 1,557
- 349
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2014
I'd still put my money on 250!
- 683
- 233
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2013
I'd make the price go as high as possible so there is less chance of people copping my pair online on release day.
jk NT fam...
- 683
- 233
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2013
According to folks around here, buying Jordans has been more difficult than years past on certain models.
An OG colorway with NA on the back, "remastered", yeah there is no way the prices aren't going to be insane in atleast a month.
Really this shoe will be what all resellers are going to be vying for in order to do some big cookin.
Lemme guess, The New York Company on ebay still has '12 Cements going for $600 and up right? What a joke.
Last edited:
- 5,011
- 6,425
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2014
Given the laser 4s were $250, I don't see why they wouldn't price these the same. Personally, I hope the rumor is wrong, and the jumpman appears on the back instead of NA so the demand will be lower, and I can get a pair. That said, despite the naysayers, I expect the demand would only be marginally lower. It might go from uber impossible to get (NA) to super impossible to get (jumpman). This is my grail; I may just quit collecting after this pair and enjoy what I have at this point. That said, I may be tempted by an BC3 ;-).
- 48,230
- 28,256
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2006
yall gotta stop gossiping about a price, damb
- 1,557
- 349
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2014
This whole post is gossip and or speculation.
- 1,557
- 349
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2014
Thread not post
- 5,011
- 6,425
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2014
Isn't the actual release speculation as well?
- 2,180
- 2,100
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2006
Aquamanjay_
formerly jaylaw15
- 8,180
- 9,257
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2014
SC just confirmed
- 1,975
- 1,027
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2013
More limited than 88 3s tho
- 20,022
- 10,864
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2009
It actually said "less limited" in that article.
Balt's track record improves yet again.
Ol' boy a page or two back was right about them being a February release as well, so maybe they're $220 after all.
Last edited:
Aquamanjay_
formerly jaylaw15
- 8,180
- 9,257
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2014
Last edited:
- 5,809
- 9,210
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2013
Aquamanjay_
formerly jaylaw15
- 8,180
- 9,257
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2014
Baltsneakershow just co signed again
I just hope they are not like the Chicago's and Shattered B 1s
Last edited:
- 389
- 374
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2014
Is that confirmed enough about the February release?
- 563
- 218
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2015
SC said more 1's as well, interesting
- 5,019
- 2,819
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2001
More limited prolly
Aquamanjay_
formerly jaylaw15
- 8,180
- 9,257
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2014
the retro 88s were more limited than the Chicago's 1s? Because they said they'll be less limited than those.
Chill Bill
formerly ihaveaquestion
- 3,717
- 2,247
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2014
Man 250!
No double ups for me
No double ups for me
- 5,019
- 2,819
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2001
I read their description wrong
But
I would say cement88s were just as "limited" as chicagos.
But
I would say cement88s were just as "limited" as chicagos.
Aquamanjay_
formerly jaylaw15
- 8,180
- 9,257
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2014
- 20,022
- 10,864
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2009
Calm down, you got it young god
All I was saying was that you didn't have an established track record to the best of my knowledge for you to just be throwing out sourceless information and leaving it like that. Thanks for the heads up.
- 683
- 233
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2013
**** this limited ********. Chicagos were probably limited as well. Really disappointing.
Last edited:
