- 86
- 10
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2006
The blue/orange ones are much brighter than what the pictures depict.
Official: NIKE AIR MAX+ 2012 - Summer 2012 (CounterKicks.com)
- 86
- 10
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2006
The blue/orange ones are much brighter than what the pictures depict.
- 3,018
- 1,251
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2005
I have to admit, the White/Blue Pair looked really nice in person. Stock Pictures do nothing for them.
I also tried them on and they fit half size big for me. Im a 9 in the 2009, AM 360 and an 8.5 fit me perfect in the 2012. FWIW, my foot measures a 9 on the foot measure.
I also tried them on and they fit half size big for me. Im a 9 in the 2009, AM 360 and an 8.5 fit me perfect in the 2012. FWIW, my foot measures a 9 on the foot measure.
- 3,018
- 1,251
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2005
I have to admit, the White/Blue Pair looked really nice in person. Stock Pictures do nothing for them.
I also tried them on and they fit half size big for me. Im a 9 in the 2009, AM 360 and an 8.5 fit me perfect in the 2012. FWIW, my foot measures a 9 on the foot measure.
I also tried them on and they fit half size big for me. Im a 9 in the 2009, AM 360 and an 8.5 fit me perfect in the 2012. FWIW, my foot measures a 9 on the foot measure.
- 3,121
- 6,727
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2005
hi everyone,
just wanted to post a picture of how the LAF Air Max+ 2012 shoes look like. sorry for no tags... i haven't been on NT for a long, long time since LeBron 8s, hah!
the yellow looks a lot better in person than the pictures previously shown... hope this helps!
just wanted to post a picture of how the LAF Air Max+ 2012 shoes look like. sorry for no tags... i haven't been on NT for a long, long time since LeBron 8s, hah!
the yellow looks a lot better in person than the pictures previously shown... hope this helps!
- 3,121
- 6,727
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2005
hi everyone,
just wanted to post a picture of how the LAF Air Max+ 2012 shoes look like. sorry for no tags... i haven't been on NT for a long, long time since LeBron 8s, hah!
the yellow looks a lot better in person than the pictures previously shown... hope this helps!
just wanted to post a picture of how the LAF Air Max+ 2012 shoes look like. sorry for no tags... i haven't been on NT for a long, long time since LeBron 8s, hah!
the yellow looks a lot better in person than the pictures previously shown... hope this helps!
- 765
- 74
- Joined
- May 15, 2004
^Nice pic of the LAF AM2012, it sold me. I just placed an order right now using a voucher I got for my returned AM2011. Thanks for the pic.
- 765
- 74
- Joined
- May 15, 2004
^Nice pic of the LAF AM2012, it sold me. I just placed an order right now using a voucher I got for my returned AM2011. Thanks for the pic.
- 43,552
- 27,851
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2002
Livestrong looking good up there. Steep price to pay so I'll just stare at the pic. Thinking about getting the black/reds for $140 but I think I should wait.
- 43,552
- 27,851
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2002
Livestrong looking good up there. Steep price to pay so I'll just stare at the pic. Thinking about getting the black/reds for $140 but I think I should wait.
- 8,877
- 452
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2006
As always, thanks for the info Jeff. I only wanted to know from now to the 2009 but i didnt specify and i dont mind lol.Originally Posted by jeffgdula
2009 > 2012 > 2011 > 2010 > 360 (2006) > 360 II (2007) > 360 III (200
but the gap between the 2009 and 2012 is the closest in my book.
The 2009s are iconic, very comfy, had some great CWs and were on iD
The 2012s have some nice colorblocking, compelling CWs at release and would have been great on iD
The 2011s had some nice GR CWs but could've used some more color options on iD
The 2010s were very under-rated IMO. Not nearly enough CWs and they were pretty comfy if you went up .5 size
The original 360s were comfy, but could've used more CWs
The 360 IIs had nice colorblocking, but not enough nice CWs
The 360 IIIs were just weird. Not comfy, very weird CWs and it was hard to make them look nice even on iD
- 8,877
- 452
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2006
As always, thanks for the info Jeff. I only wanted to know from now to the 2009 but i didnt specify and i dont mind lol.Originally Posted by jeffgdula
2009 > 2012 > 2011 > 2010 > 360 (2006) > 360 II (2007) > 360 III (200
but the gap between the 2009 and 2012 is the closest in my book.
The 2009s are iconic, very comfy, had some great CWs and were on iD
The 2012s have some nice colorblocking, compelling CWs at release and would have been great on iD
The 2011s had some nice GR CWs but could've used some more color options on iD
The 2010s were very under-rated IMO. Not nearly enough CWs and they were pretty comfy if you went up .5 size
The original 360s were comfy, but could've used more CWs
The 360 IIs had nice colorblocking, but not enough nice CWs
The 360 IIIs were just weird. Not comfy, very weird CWs and it was hard to make them look nice even on iD
al audi
Banned
- 29,810
- 4,562
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2009
thanks for the pic
best CW so far imo, i love em
copped
edit: yep, this confirmed for me that 2012s>2011s
the right color combo, these air maxs are nice
2nd edit: just made that live strong pic computer background, nice pic. thanks
al audi
Banned
- 29,810
- 4,562
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2009
thanks for the pic
best CW so far imo, i love em
copped
edit: yep, this confirmed for me that 2012s>2011s
the right color combo, these air maxs are nice
2nd edit: just made that live strong pic computer background, nice pic. thanks
- 311
- 33
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2010
the blue on the outsole is definitely royal, unless i'm color blind. on the upper, it's more aqua-+%* or something. box says 'blue spark.'
- 311
- 33
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2010
the blue on the outsole is definitely royal, unless i'm color blind. on the upper, it's more aqua-+%* or something. box says 'blue spark.'
- 589
- 360
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2007
those livestrong 2012.
- 589
- 360
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2007
those livestrong 2012.
- 22,645
- 47,695
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2005
LSs look GREAT! I love the Swoosh placement on these!
- 22,645
- 47,695
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2005
LSs look GREAT! I love the Swoosh placement on these!
- 55,205
- 62,504
- Joined
- May 15, 2003
Those Livestrongs look nice
The first couple of colorways haven't impressed me yet
Especially with the 2009's coming back out and the ability to ID
The first couple of colorways haven't impressed me yet
Especially with the 2009's coming back out and the ability to ID
- 55,205
- 62,504
- Joined
- May 15, 2003
Those Livestrongs look nice
The first couple of colorways haven't impressed me yet
Especially with the 2009's coming back out and the ability to ID
The first couple of colorways haven't impressed me yet
Especially with the 2009's coming back out and the ability to ID
- 297
- 12
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2001
These fit true to size like 09 and 11's or half size up like 2010's?
- 297
- 12
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2001
These fit true to size like 09 and 11's or half size up like 2010's?
- 3,018
- 1,251
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2005
I actually had to go a half size down. My foot measures a 9 on the foot measurer, and an 8.5 fit perfect. So to me, they run big.
