jpzx
Supporter
- 55,727
- 25,291
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2008
I just read through the last four pages, and I multi-quoted the hell out of pretty much all of you so bare with me for a minute:
She delivered a "I won't ever see her as a sane person in any film she's in going forward." I think there's a lot of layers to a person that can be so very good at playing that part. Interesting to me.
Dope, but:
Dude scrapped his honeymoon to be at the Golden Globes and he'll probably win nothing else the rest of his life... the rest of his married life. His wife already had to deal with that **** and now she's going to deal with his increasing frustration as his acting career never tops this.
Thank you for giving me the perfect definition of awful. Can't stand when people use it on any and everything they weren't high on.
Transformers 3 might top that for you, since you'll see a transformer ride a dinosaur transformer when the damn transformer doesn't need to be strapped to riding anything. He's a transformer himself, just transform into a T-Rex.
Wait, Venom uses 'awful' for Grand Budapest Hotel but raved about Spring Breakers? I don't want to compare Wes Anderson to Harmony Korine but the elements and allure to both are identical. Visual and Gucci Mane villain in both.
It absolutely doesn't need that, and I feel like that's become such an assumption that it's carved out role after role after role where females have no personalities to speak of and are only really there as a "oh well, we have to do this somewhere in the middle" and because of that it's always throwaway, horrible and rashly put together.
Yeah Dave Franco is going to add another movie to his resume where he's playing Dave Franco
Agreed. Saw it for the first time a couple of years ago, thought the same thing.
I said this when I saw it, but I've sort of come to the realization that Keanu Reeves is virtually emotionless in his regular, scene-to-scene standard acting. But when asked to be emotional -- like we saw in the scene when the package came to his door that one night -- he's, I mean, brilliant.
It's really the word I would use. For example, when he goes to talk to Diane Lane in Hardball and the "I think you like me, I just got this gut feeling when you..." scene and his eulogy at G-Baby's funeral. Then the scene with the package in this movie, incredible. Seriously. It's just that he brings almost none of the elements of that to the other broad majority of his performance.
Rosamund Pike. Crazy dangerous yambs appreciated.
She delivered a "I won't ever see her as a sane person in any film she's in going forward." I think there's a lot of layers to a person that can be so very good at playing that part. Interesting to me.
Just found out my neighbors daughter is also the Stephen hawking dudes publicist. Pretty dope.
Dope, but:
Dude scrapped his honeymoon to be at the Golden Globes and he'll probably win nothing else the rest of his life... the rest of his married life. His wife already had to deal with that **** and now she's going to deal with his increasing frustration as his acting career never tops this.
Can we think for a second about what the word "awful" means? Basically terrible, with no redeeming value.
Thank you for giving me the perfect definition of awful. Can't stand when people use it on any and everything they weren't high on.
A movie is only awful if it's on the level of Transformers 2. After watching that movie, I can honestly almost watch any movie on earth
Transformers 3 might top that for you, since you'll see a transformer ride a dinosaur transformer when the damn transformer doesn't need to be strapped to riding anything. He's a transformer himself, just transform into a T-Rex.
I never actually saw Spring Breakers. I just mentioned it because I remembered Venom raving about it. I'm fairly sure I wouldn't like it, but I willing to accept that it's not awful.
Wait, Venom uses 'awful' for Grand Budapest Hotel but raved about Spring Breakers? I don't want to compare Wes Anderson to Harmony Korine but the elements and allure to both are identical. Visual and Gucci Mane villain in both.
john wick was very entertaining to me. lacked female influence in the movie though. a good action movie needs some eye candy.
It absolutely doesn't need that, and I feel like that's become such an assumption that it's carved out role after role after role where females have no personalities to speak of and are only really there as a "oh well, we have to do this somewhere in the middle" and because of that it's always throwaway, horrible and rashly put together.
Just saw there's going to be a "Now You See Me 2" Any info?
Yeah Dave Franco is going to add another movie to his resume where he's playing Dave Franco
Watched philadelphia, movie did not age well
Agreed. Saw it for the first time a couple of years ago, thought the same thing.
John Wick - Enjoyed the movie, no matter how implausible the plot and poor an actor Keanu is. I usually hate movies like this, but it wasnt terrible.
I said this when I saw it, but I've sort of come to the realization that Keanu Reeves is virtually emotionless in his regular, scene-to-scene standard acting. But when asked to be emotional -- like we saw in the scene when the package came to his door that one night -- he's, I mean, brilliant.
It's really the word I would use. For example, when he goes to talk to Diane Lane in Hardball and the "I think you like me, I just got this gut feeling when you..." scene and his eulogy at G-Baby's funeral. Then the scene with the package in this movie, incredible. Seriously. It's just that he brings almost none of the elements of that to the other broad majority of his performance.
Last edited: