- 125
- 14
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2008
the first article has no proof, just says it started in Mexico.Originally Posted by CallHimAR
Originally Posted by YaAintReady
got proof?Originally Posted by CallHimAR
No, it started in Mexico.Originally Posted by YaAintReady
First reports came from TEXAS!Originally Posted by Cleavland Steamer
Exactly. Mexico has *%%+!$ us...Again.Originally Posted by superuntouchable
The baby was transported to the Texas Children's hospital FROM MEXICO....
It started in the US!
http://www.cbc.ca/health/...009/04/23/swine-flu.html
^^^^u dnt even have to click the article to see the date on it!
http://www.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/04/27/swine.flu/?eref=rss_topstories
Print Earliest case of swine flu tucked away in Mexico, officials say
the second one only says,
"Meet the child known as "patient zero" by his doctors -- 5-year-old Edgar Hernandez, who survived the earliest documented case of swine flu inan outbreak that, officials say, has now spread across four continents... His family lives in the 3,000-population village of La Gloria in the state ofVeracruz, where a flu outbreak was reported on April 2."
but! this article states:
"Illnesses began in March
The two cases were in a 10-year-old boy in San Diego County and a 9-year-old girl in neighboring Imperial County, but they are apparentlyunrelated...
...The 10-year-old boy fell ill with fever, cough, and vomiting on Mar 30, according to the CDC...The CDC received a sample Apr 14 and identified the virus asswine influenza A/H1N1"
Source: http://www.cidrap.umn.edu...u/news/apr2109swine.html
So your telling me that two different people, in two different countries, started an epidemic at almost the exact same time?