- 84,376
- 110,803
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2012
Yeah!!
The Official Jordan XXXI Thread
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by yrok1986,
- Start date
- 3,647
- 4,904
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2012
The train has left the track...
- 480
- 355
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2014
AIR J XIII
Supporter
- 6,492
- 12,638
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2002
So the XXX3 is gonna be just like all of the standard JB shoes that they throw elephant print on?
- 39
- 186
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2012
Don't know - but a 5 minute fanboy photoshop job has you reacting pretty crazy.
can't believe online magazine's were even reposting those rough as hell 3d renders that popped up on here earlier like there was even a vague possibility they might be real.
people need to inspect the images on their screens a little harder.
- 149
- 52
- Joined
- May 8, 2016
Yup still 1-14 for me [emoji]128528[/emoji][emoji]128529[/emoji]
- 2,138
- 1,019
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2012
Your expectations sound too high. Please lower them.
Best of luck in your surgery though.
Last edited:
- 169
- 141
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2016
Good luck man ,wishing you a fast recovery!
- 8,799
- 10,386
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2015
BOOM! lol
Last edited:
- 8,799
- 10,386
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2015
Is it showing up? Im not seeing it in the sidebar gallery...
Just in case
I like everything but the Jumpman placement. Ironically, I would've preferred it on the back of the heel like Jordan 1 mids or on the tongue if no NA tag. Or none at all.
Loving the faded swoosh. I wish the Jumpman was faded with it.
I hope it says NA on the tongue though.
If anything, I hope the Jumpman is facing forward on the other shoe. Or did they get around this by putting the Wings logo on the other one? Everything feels inspired design-wise but the placement of the Jumpman.
Just in case
I like everything but the Jumpman placement. Ironically, I would've preferred it on the back of the heel like Jordan 1 mids or on the tongue if no NA tag. Or none at all.
Loving the faded swoosh. I wish the Jumpman was faded with it.
I hope it says NA on the tongue though.
If anything, I hope the Jumpman is facing forward on the other shoe. Or did they get around this by putting the Wings logo on the other one? Everything feels inspired design-wise but the placement of the Jumpman.
Last edited:
D
Deleted member 107398
Guest
BOOM! lol
If these are them....
Literally the only thing ruining the shoe is the big ol jumpman
- 73,140
- 59,910
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2004
kind of dig the fading swoosh
looks nice and simple
flipped that pic to the side
View media item 2102116
looks nice and simple
flipped that pic to the side
View media item 2102116
- 8,799
- 10,386
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2015
Yeah, these would be sick af but that Jumpman is what will keep these from being iconic. Kudos on the tasteful midsole/outsole though.
In the end, ego brings them down.
Thanks for flipping the pic, RFX
In the end, ego brings them down.
Thanks for flipping the pic, RFX
- 8,799
- 10,386
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2015
A small Jumpman inside the fat rounded part of the swoosh would've been dope. It would fit nice there.
Or a tiny one right at the bottom of the blade before it meets the handle on the midsole at the toe.
Or a tiny one right at the bottom of the blade before it meets the handle on the midsole at the toe.
Last edited:
D
Deleted member 107398
Guest
Come on JB, you are so close to having it right, resize that jumpman or remove it all together! 
That jumpman takes them from looking like a sig shoe to a team shoe
That jumpman takes them from looking like a sig shoe to a team shoe
Last edited by a moderator:
- 8,799
- 10,386
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2015
I vote remove it altogether. Wrap that updated wings logo around the heel.Come on JB, you are so close to having it right, resize that jumpman or remove it all together!
- 8,799
- 10,386
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2015
This has me worried about what waits on the other shoe...
If its reversed on the other shoe then this all black pair is the only one I'll consider. Atleast it fades into the stitching.
If its reversed on the other shoe then this all black pair is the only one I'll consider. Atleast it fades into the stitching.
Last edited:
- 628
- 1,049
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2014
I like!!! After the xx9, I'm not opposed to the bigger Jumpman. It seems that visually the Jumpman has replaced the original swoosh in terms of space. Very well done JB!!
Can't wait to see both shoes and the medial sides!
Can't wait to see both shoes and the medial sides!
Last edited:
- 628
- 1,049
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2014
AND you can totally see dudes reflection taking the pic with his phone
- 2,138
- 1,019
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2012
pretty much just look like the Jordan ultra fly. Nothing says "flagship model" about them.
- 5
- 17
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2016
My photoshop pic so close..JB is done & poor !!
- 356
- 295
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2012
Better than the XXXs? No way. That double branding is weak AF.
- 549
- 736
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2009
These are INCREDIBLE! [emoji]128591[/emoji][emoji]127995[/emoji][emoji]128591[/emoji][emoji]127995[/emoji][emoji]128591[/emoji][emoji]127995[/emoji][emoji]128591[/emoji][emoji]127995[/emoji][emoji]128591[/emoji][emoji]127995[/emoji]
- 11,773
- 14,351
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2013
I'm surprised the general consensus thus far (if those are them) in here is liking them. I don't dislike them, but don't consider that to be anything special.
In fact, I'm pretty sure we could have created a thread that these were the next Jordan Superfly and people would have bought it.
I do agree that the double branding is strange. Interested to hear about the materials.
I'm a neutral (subject to change), but copping most likely as of now.
In fact, I'm pretty sure we could have created a thread that these were the next Jordan Superfly and people would have bought it.
I do agree that the double branding is strange. Interested to hear about the materials.
I'm a neutral (subject to change), but copping most likely as of now.
