- 9,921
- 4,296
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2009
The almighty dollar says.
WELCOME TO THE MARVEL MULTIVERSE -*RIP STAN LEE & Boseman* - XMEN97 release 3/20
The almighty dollar says.
- 10,890
- 9,135
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2014
Marvel too busy flourising off of the future Black Panther and Spider-Man franchise to worry about IM4
everysingletime
formerly amel223
- 42,963
- 15,346
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2006
Please no. No desire to see an IM4 movie.
Last edited:
- 11,114
- 3,728
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2008
I agree. No more IM movies. We're past that. Just make him appear in other movies.
- 22,235
- 10,972
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2003
These movies are made to make money.
Marvel/Disney isn't getting the all or any of the box office for the Spider-Man movies.
Iron Man 3 broke a billion.
There is no way there won't be another Iron Man movie.
Last edited:
- 87,735
- 50,128
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2007
Actually that's part of the reason it didn't happen. Feige was not signing off on any portrayals of magic until they got to introduce it with Dr. Strange. Its why the rumors of Favreau's version of the Mandarin was way more tech based.
Its why the Scarlet Witch has no signs of being a magic user yet.
There's a good chance of it but don't bank on it due to how much RDJR gets paid and trying to carve out a space for it in phase 4 which is 4 years from now.
Plus the problem is Tony's arch enemy is mostly a magic user. I understand the contrast but he really doesn't have a stellar rogues gallery where you could even prop up somebody else to be more prominent. So it'll need some punching up even if the Mandarin is the villain for real.
If it does happen, keeping in mind what I mentioned they may just film 2 movies back to back. Cuz I think it may go either way if the expectation is for the movie to make a billion again which I think won't happen unless the story is the best IM story possible.
Last edited:
- 9,921
- 4,296
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2009
- 8,726
- 3,487
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2013
Still say that they should have only introduced Stane in Iron Man, then had him in the Iron Monger suit as the main villain for IM2. Don't get me wrong, Iron Man was still great as it was, but I think greater build-up could've made him even better, along with the second film. He's a Top 3-5 Iron Man villain, no reason to just kill him off right away.
Last edited:
- 306
- 152
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2015
- 8,416
- 1,852
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2005
its not hard to figure out at all.
the stuff you guys keep complaining about, the average movie goer couldnt care less about.
but you dudes keep trying to fit a square peg through a round hole.
(for the comprehension challenged)
EYE didnt like Ironman 3 either, but i understand the dynamics that made it a success.
everysingletime
formerly amel223
- 42,963
- 15,346
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2006
Thanks. Repped.
- 32,089
- 26,389
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2006
No more iron man movies.
Please.
Please.
Last edited:
- 22,235
- 10,972
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2003
- 32,089
- 26,389
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2006
I don't even dislike IM2 or 3.
I just don't where else there is to go with this character in a stand alone film.
I'd rather see new stories/characters.
I just don't where else there is to go with this character in a stand alone film.
I'd rather see new stories/characters.
everysingletime
formerly amel223
- 42,963
- 15,346
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2006
Man. At this point rather see, on top of what's already planned:
A third GotG
Sequels to the new Spiderman
Sequels to BP
A Black Widow movie
Before we think of another sequel for IM lol
A third GotG
Sequels to the new Spiderman
Sequels to BP
A Black Widow movie
Before we think of another sequel for IM lol
Last edited:
everysingletime
formerly amel223
- 42,963
- 15,346
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2006
This!
Last edited:
- 8,726
- 3,487
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2013
- 9,921
- 4,296
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2009
I want another Hulk solo more than anything else.
- 22,235
- 10,972
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2003
Tony Stark has as much canon as any Superhero ever but you really don't know where else he can go in movies?
Naw yall want the 18235th Spiderman rehash.
Black Panther could be *** for all yall know.
FOH.
Naw yall want the 18235th Spiderman rehash.
Black Panther could be *** for all yall know.
FOH.
Last edited:
- 8,416
- 1,852
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2005
....so magic was out of bounds because it hadnt been introduced yet, but fire breathing was just fine?
- 8,416
- 1,852
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2005
this.
- 87,735
- 50,128
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2007
If that's the viewpoint, none of the other core Avengers need movies.
Lets kill em off and focus on the New Avengers.
Fire breathing that was tech based
....so magic was out of bounds because it hadnt been introduced yet, but fire breathing was just fine?
I have no idea what they were thinking bastardizing Extremis like that. Plot would've made more sense if they just said AIM found a bunch of lava monsters living at the center of the Earth.
Last edited:
- 8,726
- 3,487
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2013
The fact that we're now in Phase 3 and still haven't gotten a Planet Hulk film hurts my soul.
Hell after Incredible Hulk I would've settled for any number of other stories. Leader was hinted at the end of that film, where the **** is he? Seeing Hulk and Maestro tangle on the big screen for Future Imperfect would be amazing. Man i'd even settle for Wendigo at this point.
Last edited:
- 87,735
- 50,128
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2007
I'm totally fine with Hulk in cameos and Avenger flicks.
Still ain't that fond of Ruffalo
I'm guessing if he signed one of those long contracts too and that's why he's in Ragnarok.
Still ain't that fond of Ruffalo
I'm guessing if he signed one of those long contracts too and that's why he's in Ragnarok.
Last edited:
- 67,861
- 102,889
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2010
Last edited:
