Who is the 2010-11 NBA MVP?

[lebron raymone james]

Who do you guys think is the consensus pick for this year? It's going to be a tough one...

 

[lebron raymone james]

Who do you guys think is the consensus pick for this year? It's going to be a tough one...

 

[nicedudewithnicedreams]

Ain't tough to lock this up tho.

 

[nicedudewithnicedreams]

Ain't tough to lock this up tho.

 

[jpzx]

On February 28, 2011...

 

[jpzx]

On February 28, 2011...

 

[yoppa guevara]

1.a Derrick Rose
1.b Lebron james

no runaway.


notables

kobe
dwight
durant
aldridge
wade

 

[yoppa guevara]

1.a Derrick Rose
1.b Lebron james

no runaway.


notables

kobe
dwight
durant
aldridge
wade

 

[duba169]

rose because i hate lebron more than i hate the bulls.

 

[duba169]

rose because i hate lebron more than i hate the bulls.

 

[that wave]

If the heat finish the season strong...Bron will win

 

[that wave]

If the heat finish the season strong...Bron will win

 

[osh kosh bosh]

Derrick Rose is a very good player, even a great player in this league today, he should be a candidate for most improved player no question,, the leaps he has made this year have been impressive without a doubt but in my eyes he is not the MVP and I'll tell you why.

The number one piece of evidence that people always point too when they talk about his MVP worthiness is his lack of support around him, I really think it's entirely untrue. He tons of support it's just not on offense The reason Chicago has been successful this year is chiefly because the defense that Tom Thibbadueu runs is incredible, Joakim Noah, Tah Gibson, Asik, Kurt Thomas, Keith Bogans, Deng, are really really effective NBA defenders Kyle Korver despite what his reputation may tell you has become pretty solid as well. Follow that with 2 elite rebounders, and 3 more really good ones the Bulls are have a stalwart defensive team that easily make up for Rose and Boozer (to a lesser extent).

This Rose MVP thing is clear example of NBA fans only looking at offensive ability, because that's the only way you can determine that Rose has no "help".

Now yes Derrick Rose is responsible for a large amount of their offense sure but for a large portion of the year he's been playing with a dude averaging almost 20 on 54% shooting.

Basically if I'm going to give you the MVP based on perceived value to the team, you better be fundamental to the winning aspects of the team, Steve Nash was fundamental to the best offense in the history of the NBA, Derrick Rose is fundamental to a bad offense and a hamper a great defensive team. Thats just the way I see it

But whatever, he's going to win anyways.

 

[osh kosh bosh]

Derrick Rose is a very good player, even a great player in this league today, he should be a candidate for most improved player no question,, the leaps he has made this year have been impressive without a doubt but in my eyes he is not the MVP and I'll tell you why.

The number one piece of evidence that people always point too when they talk about his MVP worthiness is his lack of support around him, I really think it's entirely untrue. He tons of support it's just not on offense The reason Chicago has been successful this year is chiefly because the defense that Tom Thibbadueu runs is incredible, Joakim Noah, Tah Gibson, Asik, Kurt Thomas, Keith Bogans, Deng, are really really effective NBA defenders Kyle Korver despite what his reputation may tell you has become pretty solid as well. Follow that with 2 elite rebounders, and 3 more really good ones the Bulls are have a stalwart defensive team that easily make up for Rose and Boozer (to a lesser extent).

This Rose MVP thing is clear example of NBA fans only looking at offensive ability, because that's the only way you can determine that Rose has no "help".

Now yes Derrick Rose is responsible for a large amount of their offense sure but for a large portion of the year he's been playing with a dude averaging almost 20 on 54% shooting.

Basically if I'm going to give you the MVP based on perceived value to the team, you better be fundamental to the winning aspects of the team, Steve Nash was fundamental to the best offense in the history of the NBA, Derrick Rose is fundamental to a bad offense and a hamper a great defensive team. Thats just the way I see it

But whatever, he's going to win anyways.

 

[westcoastsfinest]

d.rose

bron has been the best player in the league but i doubt he'll get cause he's playing with another MVP candidate

 

[Bert.]

 

[westcoastsfinest]

d.rose

bron has been the best player in the league but i doubt he'll get cause he's playing with another MVP candidate

 

[Bert.]

 

[rolaholic]

Originally Posted by Osh Kosh Bosh

Derrick Rose is a very good player, even a great player in this league today, he should be a candidate for most improved player no question,, the leaps he has made this year have been impressive without a doubt but in my eyes he is not the MVP and I'll tell you why.

The number one piece of evidence that people always point too when they talk about his MVP worthiness is his lack of support around him, I really think it's entirely untrue. He tons of support it's just not on offense The reason Chicago has been successful this year is chiefly because the defense that Tom Thibbadueu runs is incredible, Joakim Noah, Tah Gibson, Asik, Kurt Thomas, Keith Bogans, Deng, are really really effective NBA defenders Kyle Korver despite what his reputation may tell you has become pretty solid as well. Follow that with 2 elite rebounders, and 3 more really good ones the Bulls are have a stalwart defensive team that easily make up for Rose and Boozer (to a lesser extent).

This Rose MVP thing is clear example of NBA fans only looking at offensive ability, because that's the only way you can determine that Rose has no "help".

Now yes Derrick Rose is responsible for a large amount of their offense sure but for a large portion of the year he's been playing with a dude averaging almost 20 on 54% shooting.

Basically if I'm going to give you the MVP based on perceived value to the team, you better be fundamental to the winning aspects of the team, Steve Nash was fundamental to the best offense in the history of the NBA, Derrick Rose is fundamental to a bad offense and a hamper a great defensive team. Thats just the way I see it

But whatever, he's going to win anyways.

 

[rolaholic]

Originally Posted by Osh Kosh Bosh

Derrick Rose is a very good player, even a great player in this league today, he should be a candidate for most improved player no question,, the leaps he has made this year have been impressive without a doubt but in my eyes he is not the MVP and I'll tell you why.

The number one piece of evidence that people always point too when they talk about his MVP worthiness is his lack of support around him, I really think it's entirely untrue. He tons of support it's just not on offense The reason Chicago has been successful this year is chiefly because the defense that Tom Thibbadueu runs is incredible, Joakim Noah, Tah Gibson, Asik, Kurt Thomas, Keith Bogans, Deng, are really really effective NBA defenders Kyle Korver despite what his reputation may tell you has become pretty solid as well. Follow that with 2 elite rebounders, and 3 more really good ones the Bulls are have a stalwart defensive team that easily make up for Rose and Boozer (to a lesser extent).

This Rose MVP thing is clear example of NBA fans only looking at offensive ability, because that's the only way you can determine that Rose has no "help".

Now yes Derrick Rose is responsible for a large amount of their offense sure but for a large portion of the year he's been playing with a dude averaging almost 20 on 54% shooting.

Basically if I'm going to give you the MVP based on perceived value to the team, you better be fundamental to the winning aspects of the team, Steve Nash was fundamental to the best offense in the history of the NBA, Derrick Rose is fundamental to a bad offense and a hamper a great defensive team. Thats just the way I see it

But whatever, he's going to win anyways.

 

[sooperhooper]

In my opinion Amare should win it. He took the Knicks to the playoffs. I won't be mad if D rose gets it tho, he's cool with me. I may even buy his kicks.

 

[sooperhooper]

In my opinion Amare should win it. He took the Knicks to the playoffs. I won't be mad if D rose gets it tho, he's cool with me. I may even buy his kicks.

 

[got shoes]

Originally Posted by Osh Kosh Bosh

Derrick Rose is a very good player, even a great player in this league today, he should be a candidate for most improved player no question,, the leaps he has made this year have been impressive without a doubt but in my eyes he is not the MVP and I'll tell you why.

The number one piece of evidence that people always point too when they talk about his MVP worthiness is his lack of support around him, I really think it's entirely untrue. He tons of support it's just not on offense The reason Chicago has been successful this year is chiefly because the defense that Tom Thibbadueu runs is incredible, Joakim Noah, Tah Gibson, Asik, Kurt Thomas, Keith Bogans, Deng, are really really effective NBA defenders Kyle Korver despite what his reputation may tell you has become pretty solid as well. Follow that with 2 elite rebounders, and 3 more really good ones the Bulls are have a stalwart defensive team that easily make up for Rose and Boozer (to a lesser extent).

This Rose MVP thing is clear example of NBA fans only looking at offensive ability, because that's the only way you can determine that Rose has no "help".

Now yes Derrick Rose is responsible for a large amount of their offense sure but for a large portion of the year he's been playing with a dude averaging almost 20 on 54% shooting.

Basically if I'm going to give you the MVP based on perceived value to the team, you better be fundamental to the winning aspects of the team, Steve Nash was fundamental to the best offense in the history of the NBA, Derrick Rose is fundamental to a bad offense and a hamper a great defensive team. Thats just the way I see it

But whatever, he's going to win anyways.

I respect what you wrote though. Noah and Boozer has been out a good number of games also. And who is your MVP

 

[got shoes]

Originally Posted by Osh Kosh Bosh

Derrick Rose is a very good player, even a great player in this league today, he should be a candidate for most improved player no question,, the leaps he has made this year have been impressive without a doubt but in my eyes he is not the MVP and I'll tell you why.

The number one piece of evidence that people always point too when they talk about his MVP worthiness is his lack of support around him, I really think it's entirely untrue. He tons of support it's just not on offense The reason Chicago has been successful this year is chiefly because the defense that Tom Thibbadueu runs is incredible, Joakim Noah, Tah Gibson, Asik, Kurt Thomas, Keith Bogans, Deng, are really really effective NBA defenders Kyle Korver despite what his reputation may tell you has become pretty solid as well. Follow that with 2 elite rebounders, and 3 more really good ones the Bulls are have a stalwart defensive team that easily make up for Rose and Boozer (to a lesser extent).

This Rose MVP thing is clear example of NBA fans only looking at offensive ability, because that's the only way you can determine that Rose has no "help".

Now yes Derrick Rose is responsible for a large amount of their offense sure but for a large portion of the year he's been playing with a dude averaging almost 20 on 54% shooting.

Basically if I'm going to give you the MVP based on perceived value to the team, you better be fundamental to the winning aspects of the team, Steve Nash was fundamental to the best offense in the history of the NBA, Derrick Rose is fundamental to a bad offense and a hamper a great defensive team. Thats just the way I see it

But whatever, he's going to win anyways.

I respect what you wrote though. Noah and Boozer has been out a good number of games also. And who is your MVP

 

[AIR J XIII]

Originally Posted by sooperhooper

In my opinion Amare should win it. He took the Knicks to the playoffs. I won't be mad if D rose gets it tho, he's cool with me. I may even buy his kicks.

according to what we've seen in recent years, making the playoffs alone isnt enough, or Kobe would have had a stronger case in 06 and 07, and Wade last year.