WHOA !! Google announces INSTANT PAGES & SEARCH BY IMAGE ....

[treason]

�nice

 

[treason]

�nice

 

[durden7]

Is our society so lazy that we cant wait 3.2 seconds for a page to load?

 

[durden7]

Is our society so lazy that we cant wait 3.2 seconds for a page to load?

 

[fog]

Originally Posted by Durden7

Is our society so lazy that we cant wait 3.2 seconds for a page to load?

That's technology for ya.

 

[fog]

Originally Posted by Durden7

Is our society so lazy that we cant wait 3.2 seconds for a page to load?

That's technology for ya.

 

[frenchblue23]

Originally Posted by Durden7

Is our society so lazy that we cant wait 3.2 seconds for a page to load?

Well, if the world doesn't move forward technology wise, we'd still be dialing up on AOL.

 

[frenchblue23]

Originally Posted by Durden7

Is our society so lazy that we cant wait 3.2 seconds for a page to load?

Well, if the world doesn't move forward technology wise, we'd still be dialing up on AOL.

 

[willmatic]

Not gonna lie, I don't see what's so special about this.

 

[willmatic]

Not gonna lie, I don't see what's so special about this.

 

[any given sunday89]

Durden7 wrote:Is our society so lazy that we cant wait 3.2 seconds for a page to load?Why is it considered lazy? Why isn't it convenient? I hate when older generations always lable newer technology "lazy"

 

[any given sunday89]

Durden7 wrote:Is our society so lazy that we cant wait 3.2 seconds for a page to load?Why is it considered lazy? Why isn't it convenient? I hate when older generations always lable newer technology "lazy"

 

[cwrite78]

Originally Posted by Durden7

Is our society so lazy that we cant wait 3.2 seconds for a page to load?

I'm sure the word you're looking for is impatient. I doubt you have to do anything physical with the current search.

 

[cwrite78]

Originally Posted by Durden7

Is our society so lazy that we cant wait 3.2 seconds for a page to load?

I'm sure the word you're looking for is impatient. I doubt you have to do anything physical with the current search.

 

[servechilled81]

image search looks cool, but you can do that with tineye.com or the tineye extension for chrome

 

[servechilled81]

image search looks cool, but you can do that with tineye.com or the tineye extension for chrome

 

[james earl zones]

Can't wait

 

[james earl zones]

Can't wait

 

[jd214]

 

[jd214]

 

[soltheman]

Originally Posted by James Earl Zones

Can't wait

Wait?

 

[soltheman]

Originally Posted by James Earl Zones

Can't wait

Wait?

 

[durden7]

Well, if the world doesn't move forward technology wise, we'd still be dialing up on AOL.

I dont even think this is a step forward in terms of technology.  If anything its a lateral move.

I'm sure the word you're looking for is impatient. I doubt you have to do anything physical with the current search.
Youre right.  Lazy was an incorrect word choice.

Why is it considered lazy? Why isn't it convenient? I hate when older generations always lable newer technology "lazy"
There is no way having to not wait 3 seconds for a page to load is convenient.  I HIGHLY doubt your life is that hectic and busy that you cant spare a few seconds for a page to load.

 

[durden7]

Well, if the world doesn't move forward technology wise, we'd still be dialing up on AOL.

I dont even think this is a step forward in terms of technology.  If anything its a lateral move.

I'm sure the word you're looking for is impatient. I doubt you have to do anything physical with the current search.
Youre right.  Lazy was an incorrect word choice.

Why is it considered lazy? Why isn't it convenient? I hate when older generations always lable newer technology "lazy"
There is no way having to not wait 3 seconds for a page to load is convenient.  I HIGHLY doubt your life is that hectic and busy that you cant spare a few seconds for a page to load.

 

[jd0t86]

Originally Posted by soltheman

Originally Posted by James Earl Zones

Can't wait

Wait?

I see what you did there.