2001 Black Cement 3 Legit Check

[23michaeljordan45]

Browsing around last night and came across these. The date does not touch the barcode like believe it should, can someone just confirm for me if these are real or not?

Thank you.

 

[jaysquared]

I believe those are fake. Date not touching barcode as you mentioned. Overall shape is off. Cement print on heel rises up too high. Front part of the shoe curves up too much .Should see some signs of yellowing/paint cracking and such. These shoes would be 11 years old, should have more signs of age.

 

[airthompson]

Fake. Shape is off, tongue is blocky opposed to round which is always a sign, grey is a tad bit too light, toe box is round.

 

[dfrnkln06]

These are fake because the date on the tag says August 20, 2002 and these suppose to be the 2001 retro.

 

[23michaeljordan45]

Alright, thank you all for reassuring my old knowledge.

Mods you can lock this up.

 

[chris316]

Fake.

Tag shows 2 different production dates.

Last production of BC 3's with Nike Air logo was in '99 not '01 nor in '05.

 

[sickickz23]

The most obvious tell is that horrible looking Nike Air on the heel tab...

 

[matt2126]

Fake.

Tag shows 2 different production dates.

Last production of BC 3's with Nike Air logo was in '99 not '01 nor in '05.

Odd, I have a legit pair with the receipt still from champs, from 2001.

 

[iavarone48]

The counterfeits lol

 

[freddy fig]

Elephant print fugazzi as hell

 

[matt2126]

My 2001s tag