- Apr 9, 2014
- 74
- 19
If the production dates and serial numbers do not match for both shoes, should I even bother posting pictures?
2009 SPACE JAM L/C
- Thread in 'Archive: Jordan Brand Price/Fake Checks' Thread starter Started by teamxbladz,
- Start date
- Oct 24, 2010
- 95,271
- 34,509
production dates can differ on each shoe
serial is supposed to be the same as its same shoe.
post em up anyways?
serial is supposed to be the same as its same shoe.
post em up anyways?
Last edited:
- Apr 9, 2014
- 74
- 19
Have at it....
- Apr 18, 2014
- 640
- 211
Legit Space Jams. The patent leather cuts are good, and the stitching is good. The only concern I have is that the 23s are stretched but they're probably just stretched from the shoes being worn.
- Apr 9, 2014
- 74
- 19
This bluish tint on the sole is one of my main concerns.
- Mar 25, 2013
- 10,285
- 3,826
Snap a shot of the tag behind the tongue.. them 23s do look a little off IMHO.
- Apr 18, 2014
- 640
- 211
If the soles have a blue tint then that is a big concern. I'm sure you know that Space Jams have never released with blue-tinted soles and have only released with clear ones.
- Jun 21, 2013
- 4,425
- 2,053
the yellowing doesnt look right
- Dec 7, 2001
- 8,274
- 2,165
those are legit. the grey market pairs have a end production date of 08/21/09
Rumble Gang
formerly retrohead182
- Oct 6, 2013
- 7,981
- 4,083
Idk it could be the pics but the 23s look stretched and the yellowing has more of a green tint like what happens to blued soles after a lot of wear. Though mismatched production dates are normal. Happens a lot. Either it happens in the factory or someone when they go to pick up shoes in store picks the best pair outta a few different boxes
- Jan 6, 2014
- 5,676
- 1,759
Looks fine to me. Honestly don't think there's anything wrong with these..
