- Jan 30, 2007
- 3,177
- 1,338
Isn't Rose's nickname pooh??
Yeah and I think his first name is Derrick too...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Isn't Rose's nickname pooh??
Yeah and I think his first name is Derrick too...
Isn't Rose's nickname pooh??
Yeah and I think his first name is Derrick too...
notsureifsrs...Originally Posted by Spectacular23
Originally Posted by AntBanks81
Here is my list
1)Rose
2)Pooh
3)Derrick
Someone made the point that LeBron's team had a worse record with better players...that should stop him right there.
I really do believe that Rose should have every first place vote..I know it won't happen, but that's how I feel.
Isn't Rose's nickname pooh??
notsureifsrs...Originally Posted by Spectacular23
Originally Posted by AntBanks81
Here is my list
1)Rose
2)Pooh
3)Derrick
Someone made the point that LeBron's team had a worse record with better players...that should stop him right there.
I really do believe that Rose should have every first place vote..I know it won't happen, but that's how I feel.
Isn't Rose's nickname pooh??
Yeah and I think his first name is Derrick too...
Yeah and I think his first name is Derrick too...
Originally Posted by Spectacular23
Originally Posted by AntBanks81
Here is my list
1)Rose
2)Pooh
3)Derrick
Someone made the point that LeBron's team had a worse record with better players...that should stop him right there.
I really do believe that Rose should have every first place vote..I know it won't happen, but that's how I feel.
Isn't Rose's nickname pooh??
Originally Posted by Spectacular23
Originally Posted by AntBanks81
Here is my list
1)Rose
2)Pooh
3)Derrick
Someone made the point that LeBron's team had a worse record with better players...that should stop him right there.
I really do believe that Rose should have every first place vote..I know it won't happen, but that's how I feel.
Isn't Rose's nickname pooh??
Originally Posted by got shoes
Yeah and I think his first name is Derrick too...
Originally Posted by got shoes
Yeah and I think his first name is Derrick too...
Originally Posted by Osh Kosh Bosh
Dan LeBetard has pretty perfectly summed up the case against Rose.
http://www.miamiherald.co...-bulls-derrick-rose.html
Ah well, logic looses this battle, enjoy the MVP.
Originally Posted by Osh Kosh Bosh
Dan LeBetard has pretty perfectly summed up the case against Rose.
http://www.miamiherald.co...-bulls-derrick-rose.html
Ah well, logic looses this battle, enjoy the MVP.
He made a huge mistake just a few paragraphs in: "They are essentially the same player, in other words."Originally Posted by Osh Kosh Bosh
Dan LeBetard has pretty perfectly summed up the case against Rose.
http://www.miamiherald.co...-bulls-derrick-rose.html
Ah well, logic looses this battle, enjoy the MVP.
He made a huge mistake just a few paragraphs in: "They are essentially the same player, in other words."Originally Posted by Osh Kosh Bosh
Dan LeBetard has pretty perfectly summed up the case against Rose.
http://www.miamiherald.co...-bulls-derrick-rose.html
Ah well, logic looses this battle, enjoy the MVP.
[h1]For Chicago Bulls’ Derrick Rose, winning alters all numbers[/h1]
![]()
Derrick Rose of the Chicago Bulls runs to the court before a game against the Memphis Grizzlies at the United Center on March 25, 2011 in Chicago, Illinois. The Bulls defeated the Grizzlies 99-96.
JONATHAN DANIEL / GETTY IMAGES
![]()
[h3]By Dan Le Batard[/h3][h3][email protected][/h3]
These are the numbers/facts without manipulation:
Through Saturday, Player X has averaged 22.1 points on .444 shooting with 4.8 rebounds, 7.1 assists and 1.5 steals. He has been his conference’s player of the week four times.
Player Y has averaged 24.9 points on .439 shooting with 4.2 rebounds, 7.9 assists and 1.0 steals. He has been his conference’s player of the week twice.
They are essentially the same player, in other words. Player X is more efficient and a better rebounder and thief, but Player Y scores one more basket per game. Yet Player X isn’t even considered the most valuable player on his own team. And Player Y is about to be named the most valuable player of the entire league.
Why Y?
Perception is not reality. Reality is reality. Player X (Russell Westbrook) isn’t viewed like Player Y (Derrick Rose) because winning alters all, even facts, even if one team is 53-19 and the other is 47-24. Exceed our expectations, and we’ll give you trophies you don’t deserve instead of admitting that our expectations were, um, wrong.
Rose has thorns
The Bulls’ offense is statistically mediocre; Rose is that offense’s best player. The Bulls’ defense is best in the league; Rose might be that defense’s least important piece. But throw all the ingredients together in the Winning Pot, make a stew with a flavor that surprises us and you, too, can taste like MVP.
Rose benefits from the greatness of his teammates, but Westbrook is harmed by the greatness of his more famous one (Kevin Durant). Would Westbrook be MVP if he simply had Chicago’s defense? Would he be a bigger scorer than Rose if he didn’t have to share with Durant? The only reason Rose scores 2.7 points more than Westbrook per game? He has taken 200 more shots.
They should just rename the MVP trophy The We Didn’t Expect To See Rose Sitting Atop LeBron In The Standings Award.
A million variables go into winning, but baseball is so much better at isolating and measuring those variables than basketball. Felix Hernandez won Cy Young with a 13-12 record in last place because baseball voters understand, after a mathematical paradigm shift called sabermetrics, how much Hernandez can and can’t control. And baseball is an individual sport masquerading as a team sport anyway. Albert Pujols is alone in that batter’s box, and it doesn’t matter if he listens to his manager or likes his third baseman. Hernandez controlled that baseball only when he held it; he couldn’t do anything about how terrible his teammates were at scoring.
Group effort
But basketball’s five are linked like fingers in a fist, and isolating performance is next to impossible, especially on defense. So intangibles get assigned to the winning instead of facts or data, and Rose has in his favor the Hey-I-Didn’t-Expect-The-Bulls-To-Be-Good metric that LeBron or Dwight Howard or Kobe or any of the Spurs or Mavs or Celtics can’t have. It is absurd that he will soon have as many MVPs as Shaquille O’Neal, but not as absurd as Steve Nash having twice as many as Shaq.
The Bulls aren’t exceeding expectations because Rose is a “leader
[h1]For Chicago Bulls’ Derrick Rose, winning alters all numbers[/h1]
![]()
Derrick Rose of the Chicago Bulls runs to the court before a game against the Memphis Grizzlies at the United Center on March 25, 2011 in Chicago, Illinois. The Bulls defeated the Grizzlies 99-96.
JONATHAN DANIEL / GETTY IMAGES
![]()
[h3]By Dan Le Batard[/h3][h3][email protected][/h3]
These are the numbers/facts without manipulation:
Through Saturday, Player X has averaged 22.1 points on .444 shooting with 4.8 rebounds, 7.1 assists and 1.5 steals. He has been his conference’s player of the week four times.
Player Y has averaged 24.9 points on .439 shooting with 4.2 rebounds, 7.9 assists and 1.0 steals. He has been his conference’s player of the week twice.
They are essentially the same player, in other words. Player X is more efficient and a better rebounder and thief, but Player Y scores one more basket per game. Yet Player X isn’t even considered the most valuable player on his own team. And Player Y is about to be named the most valuable player of the entire league.
Why Y?
Perception is not reality. Reality is reality. Player X (Russell Westbrook) isn’t viewed like Player Y (Derrick Rose) because winning alters all, even facts, even if one team is 53-19 and the other is 47-24. Exceed our expectations, and we’ll give you trophies you don’t deserve instead of admitting that our expectations were, um, wrong.
Rose has thorns
The Bulls’ offense is statistically mediocre; Rose is that offense’s best player. The Bulls’ defense is best in the league; Rose might be that defense’s least important piece. But throw all the ingredients together in the Winning Pot, make a stew with a flavor that surprises us and you, too, can taste like MVP.
Rose benefits from the greatness of his teammates, but Westbrook is harmed by the greatness of his more famous one (Kevin Durant). Would Westbrook be MVP if he simply had Chicago’s defense? Would he be a bigger scorer than Rose if he didn’t have to share with Durant? The only reason Rose scores 2.7 points more than Westbrook per game? He has taken 200 more shots.
They should just rename the MVP trophy The We Didn’t Expect To See Rose Sitting Atop LeBron In The Standings Award.
A million variables go into winning, but baseball is so much better at isolating and measuring those variables than basketball. Felix Hernandez won Cy Young with a 13-12 record in last place because baseball voters understand, after a mathematical paradigm shift called sabermetrics, how much Hernandez can and can’t control. And baseball is an individual sport masquerading as a team sport anyway. Albert Pujols is alone in that batter’s box, and it doesn’t matter if he listens to his manager or likes his third baseman. Hernandez controlled that baseball only when he held it; he couldn’t do anything about how terrible his teammates were at scoring.
Group effort
But basketball’s five are linked like fingers in a fist, and isolating performance is next to impossible, especially on defense. So intangibles get assigned to the winning instead of facts or data, and Rose has in his favor the Hey-I-Didn’t-Expect-The-Bulls-To-Be-Good metric that LeBron or Dwight Howard or Kobe or any of the Spurs or Mavs or Celtics can’t have. It is absurd that he will soon have as many MVPs as Shaquille O’Neal, but not as absurd as Steve Nash having twice as many as Shaq.
The Bulls aren’t exceeding expectations because Rose is a “leader
You are 100% correct. They arent the same player. Russell Westbrook plays great defense. Rose plays little.Originally Posted by illfrozn
He made a huge mistake just a few paragraphs in: "They are essentially the same player, in other words."Originally Posted by Osh Kosh Bosh
Dan LeBetard has pretty perfectly summed up the case against Rose.
http://www.miamiherald.co...-bulls-derrick-rose.html
Ah well, logic looses this battle, enjoy the MVP.
Wow...no, they are not. Stats wise, they may be close, but please believe it, they are not the same player. And his silliness with the whole "Hey-I-Didn’t-Expect-The-Bulls-To-Be-Good", can also go for "I didn't think he'd have this type of year" for Westbrook.
Stats are clearly important, but about other basketball variables?