2011 True Blue 3 L/C Lot of pics! Reps for help!

Discussion in 'Archive: Jordan Brand Price/Fake Checks' started by teamxbladz, Feb 24, 2016.

  1. teamxbladz

    teamxbladz

    74
    19
    Joined
    Apr 9, 2014
    Some notes..

    -Perforations on the ankle collars are very light

    -No quality control indication of any kind in the box

    -No MSRP on the size tag and no perforation from missing MSRP

    Thanks in advance!
     
    timmybrixxx likes this.
  2. teamxbladz

    teamxbladz

    74
    19
    Joined
    Apr 9, 2014
    Also wanted to note that looking from the top the back of the heels come to a V shape rather than a U shape.
     
  3. timmybrixxx

    timmybrixxx

    9,584
    3,462
    Joined
    Mar 25, 2013
    Let me start by saying THANK YOU for being able to take a decent set of pix..Thats beginning to be VERY hard to come by around here. Reps.

    As for the shoes, I'm on the fence.. I wanna say legit based on the age they are showing on the back tabs and some of the tooling - like straight tongues, correct height of and pattern of Eprints etc..

    Now things im noticing that may be an issue is no MSRP or perfs on the box label...By the shoes having US size stickers inside, they should have a US box label as well. The shape of the collars not being a nice "U" shape and the heights of the tongues look tall on this pair. The JUMPMAN logo seems to be floating in the middle instead of close to the top like legit pairs..Also the color of blue seems a bit dark, but this could be the images or camera. Lastly i pulled my pair out to compare sizetags..Your tag looks just like mine down to the production dates..However your tag is taller..Both of my tags the top is very close to the ball of the black jumpman - making my tags more square. Im not sure if thats an issue, but its something i noted. Also im noticing the quality of the print on the card in the box is not as dark and crisp as mine..FE did a comparison showing this recently..My pair was personally purchased from FTL on release date, the silver print is much more visible on mine.

    Im leaning towards this pair not being up to snuff man..Get another opinion or two of course though. Just too many little things not adding up here..

    Snap pix of the cardboard inserts if you have them as well as the back of the box, i can compare to my pair.
     
    Last edited: Feb 25, 2016
    teamxbladz likes this.
  4. show time 96

    show time 96

    19,481
    7,836
    Joined
    Apr 6, 2008
    Not looking right would say fake OP i would pass
     
    teamxbladz likes this.
  5. yeezydog123

    yeezydog123

    524
    55
    Joined
    Feb 2, 2015
    holy ****, the shoe bottoms look off, one of the red parts look to small.
     
    teamxbladz likes this.