- Sep 5, 2010
- 94,331
- 131,946
I'm pretty sure it breaks down statistically that international players pan out better than college players.why was this ignored?
im not, you brought up the finals
quantity aint quality.
just cuz its a couple of ppl are in the finals (gino, parker and diaw) dont mean that every international player now is better than an american or international players from the 90's.
i dont understand your second point. the dream team did a lot for the sport, so with an influx of more players there would have to be more teams right?
if the logic is 3>2, then why are the best shooters in history from the past era's and not today? we only have steph?
dude you are missing the Forrest for the trees.
You are focusing on individuals and ignoring the overall quality of play of the entire league.
shooting is better = fact. look at the percentages and the attempts, Reggie, and Mullin and guys like that stand out because they were so much better in comparison to everyone else.
in the 90's it wasn't uncommon to have a starting gaurd shoot sub 30% from 3, now it almost never happens.
there have been so many international busts that for every gem like dirk there are 20 nikolov tshivilli's and darko milicics
overall, how many international players are killing today vs back then? id guess there are the same amount of good int'l players then as now.
saying that hofer's like reggie are only good in comparison to "everyone else" is the point. thats why theyre hof.
the reason nobody shoots sub 30 from 3 now is because they arent as good shooters now.
But don't quote me on that.