- 12,426
- 2,239
Trout would get Fisher, Reed, Tucker, Martes, Paulino very easily.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I wouldn't give up the entire farm for TroutAre you willing to give up Derek Fisher and 5 other prospects for Trout?Screw the dodgers. Astros throw their prospects for Trout and run away with the league.
I dont see how a contender who is already flush with young Major League talent, wouldnt give up the farm to add Trout. The idea that "I wouldnt give up ____ for Mike Trout" is absolutely insane to me.
I would throw in a first or second rounder along with Joc and two prospects
That's not a fair trade?
Well then, I guess I'm getting the phone hung up then
I still wouldn't include Urias in that trade scenario though
He could turn out to be a legit starter for the dodgers by the time Kershaw becomes washed
Nah I ain't madWell then, I guess I'm getting the phone hung up then
I still wouldn't include Urias in that trade scenario though
He could turn out to be a legit starter for the dodgers by the time Kershaw becomes washed
Any time you "might" have a legit starter for 30-33 games a year compared to 162 games of an absolute sure thing in Trout, you gotta keep Urias. I'm with ya bud........
Or, well, the opposite of that. No hard feelings.
Yeah I think it is a fun conversation.Nah I ain't madAny time you "might" have a legit starter for 30-33 games a year compared to 162 games of an absolute sure thing in Trout, you gotta keep Urias. I'm with ya bud........Well then, I guess I'm getting the phone hung up then
I still wouldn't include Urias in that trade scenario though
He could turn out to be a legit starter for the dodgers by the time Kershaw becomes washed
Or, well, the opposite of that. No hard feelings.
I rather have discussions like this rather than the bash fests that go on at the NBA thread
if Dodgers are trading just for attendance numbers, it would be redundant as we are already first in the league.Another facet I think people don't look at is that Trout puts people in seats...
No matter how they're playing he generates revenue for the franchise
I think he was speaking about the opposite, and how it would negatively affect the attendance for trading away a superstar. First place teams generally dont have a problem with people showing up to the games.Another facet I think people don't look at is that Trout puts people in seats...
No matter how they're playing he generates revenue for the franchiseif Dodgers are trading just for attendance numbers, it would be redundant as we are already first in the league.
I think he was speaking about the opposite, and how it would negatively affect the attendance for trading away a superstar. First place teams generally dont have a problem with people showing up to the games.if Dodgers are trading just for attendance numbers, it would be redundant as we are already first in the league.Another facet I think people don't look at is that Trout puts people in seats...
No matter how they're playing he generates revenue for the franchise
Unless of course you are this particular playoff team.....
It's a photograph. LOLFAKE NEWSI think he was speaking about the opposite, and how it would negatively affect the attendance for trading away a superstar. First place teams generally dont have a problem with people showing up to the games.Another facet I think people don't look at is that Trout puts people in seats...
No matter how they're playing he generates revenue for the franchiseif Dodgers are trading just for attendance numbers, it would be redundant as we are already first in the league.
Unless of course you are this particular playoff team.....
They should have told the president that for his failing inaugurationIt's a photograph. LOL
I think he was speaking about the opposite, and how it would negatively affect the attendance for trading away a superstar. First place teams generally dont have a problem with people showing up to the games.
if Dodgers are trading just for attendance numbers, it would be redundant as we are already first in the league.Another facet I think people don't look at is that Trout puts people in seats...
No matter how they're playing he generates revenue for the franchise
Unless of course you are this particular playoff team.....
FAKE NEWS
Excuses. Never seen a Giants or even an A's playoff game look like that. Just saying.Day games in the playoffspeople got work!
They should have told the president that for his failing inaugurationIt's a photograph. LOLI think he was speaking about the opposite, and how it would negatively affect the attendance for trading away a superstar. First place teams generally dont have a problem with people showing up to the games.Another facet I think people don't look at is that Trout puts people in seats...
No matter how they're playing he generates revenue for the franchiseif Dodgers are trading just for attendance numbers, it would be redundant as we are already first in the league.
Unless of course you are this particular playoff team.....
FAKE NEWS
Really though, the stats show we are first in the league! Best fans in baseball!
SeagerBellinger
Byke? More like Motorcycle.Edwin byke
Byke? More like Motorcycle.