Nope. 2(9+3) is not equal to 2 x 1(9+3)Originally Posted by HyphySole
Writing 2(9+3) is the same as 2 x (9+3).
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Nope. 2(9+3) is not equal to 2 x 1(9+3)Originally Posted by HyphySole
Writing 2(9+3) is the same as 2 x (9+3).
In theory, sure. You use a process of multiplication to distribute the 2 in order to get rid of the parentheses. As the problem is written, the 2 is attached. The ONLY way it is NOT attached is if there is another symbol between it and the parentheses. You are not breaking the order of operations by "multiplying" the 2. You're still at the parenthetical stage.Originally Posted by HyphySole
Writing 2(9+3) is the same as 2 x (9+3). Therefore after adding 9+3, you work from LEFT to RIGHT.
In theory, sure. You use a process of multiplication to distribute the 2 in order to get rid of the parentheses. As the problem is written, the 2 is attached. The ONLY way it is NOT attached is if there is another symbol between it and the parentheses. You are not breaking the order of operations by "multiplying" the 2. You're still at the parenthetical stage.Originally Posted by HyphySole
Writing 2(9+3) is the same as 2 x (9+3). Therefore after adding 9+3, you work from LEFT to RIGHT.
Originally Posted by Young Safari
Math sucks, no matter was the real answer is... neither of it actually applies to my real life.
- Safari [emoji]174[/emoji]
Originally Posted by Young Safari
Math sucks, no matter was the real answer is... neither of it actually applies to my real life.
- Safari [emoji]174[/emoji]
Originally Posted by Young Safari
Math sucks, no matter was the real answer is... neither of it actually applies to my real life.
- Safari [emoji]174[/emoji]
Originally Posted by Young Safari
Math sucks, no matter was the real answer is... neither of it actually applies to my real life.
- Safari [emoji]174[/emoji]
..........Originally Posted by cguy610
Nope. 2(9+3) is not equal to 2 x 1(9+3)Originally Posted by HyphySole
Writing 2(9+3) is the same as 2 x (9+3).
I'm sorry man but you do not comprehend how the P in PEMDAS works.Originally Posted by dmbrhs
In theory, sure. You use a process of multiplication to distribute the 2 in order to get rid of the parentheses. As the problem is written, the 2 is attached. The ONLY way it is NOT attached is if there is another symbol between it and the parentheses. You are not breaking the order of operations by "multiplying" the 2. You're still at the parenthetical stage.Originally Posted by HyphySole
Writing 2(9+3) is the same as 2 x (9+3). Therefore after adding 9+3, you work from LEFT to RIGHT.
You guys are not following through with the P in PEMDAS...maybe ya'll just want to get to the D so bad?
..........Originally Posted by cguy610
Nope. 2(9+3) is not equal to 2 x 1(9+3)Originally Posted by HyphySole
Writing 2(9+3) is the same as 2 x (9+3).
I'm sorry man but you do not comprehend how the P in PEMDAS works.Originally Posted by dmbrhs
In theory, sure. You use a process of multiplication to distribute the 2 in order to get rid of the parentheses. As the problem is written, the 2 is attached. The ONLY way it is NOT attached is if there is another symbol between it and the parentheses. You are not breaking the order of operations by "multiplying" the 2. You're still at the parenthetical stage.Originally Posted by HyphySole
Writing 2(9+3) is the same as 2 x (9+3). Therefore after adding 9+3, you work from LEFT to RIGHT.
You guys are not following through with the P in PEMDAS...maybe ya'll just want to get to the D so bad?
Originally Posted by cguy610
Nope. 2(9+3) is not equal to 2 x 1(9+3)Originally Posted by HyphySole
Writing 2(9+3) is the same as 2 x (9+3).
Originally Posted by cguy610
Nope. 2(9+3) is not equal to 2 x 1(9+3)Originally Posted by HyphySole
Writing 2(9+3) is the same as 2 x (9+3).
(2*12)Originally Posted by 2g00d4u
yeah, theres this misconception with 2(9+3) and 2(12) or #(#), #(#+#), etc
2(12) = 2*12
cmon people
(2*12)Originally Posted by 2g00d4u
yeah, theres this misconception with 2(9+3) and 2(12) or #(#), #(#+#), etc
2(12) = 2*12
cmon people
As a part of the distributive property, which satisfies the parentheses...then you can move on.Originally Posted by 2g00d4u
yeah, theres this misconception with 2(9+3) and 2(12) or #(#), #(#+#), etc
2(12)=2*12
cmon people
As a part of the distributive property, which satisfies the parentheses...then you can move on.Originally Posted by 2g00d4u
yeah, theres this misconception with 2(9+3) and 2(12) or #(#), #(#+#), etc
2(12)=2*12
cmon people