7 series vs S63 vol. new season of Top Gear

[keepzdasneakz]

Originally Posted by xx Name Brand xx

Top Gear should'nt have compared the 760 to the S63 (or S65). The S63 is a naturally aspirated V8. The 760 should have been compared to the S600. They're both twin-turbo V12 sedans, and not in the M or AMG division.

A 760 vs. S63 would be like comparing a CL600 to a M6.

The S63 is a V8 with a kompressor, meaning its supercharged, not naturally aspirated. If you watched the video you could even hear the whine of the Kompressorwhen the camera was on the hood view of it. As for the S600, that's slower than the S63, it's a naturally aspirated V12. Like one of the first repliesstated, the comparo should have been with an S65 (twin turboed V12)

 

[atlien seeko]

Those cars are so beautiful and that show is the %@!#.

 

[93snakedfox]

DSC off...

@ flipping the table.

 

[mr monday niight]

somewhere ninjahood is saying he'd rather have a charger

 

[kaycurrency]

I told yall this MONTHS ago... did I not?

 

[big j 33]

When he got pinned back to his seat when the driver gunned it

 

[mateen cleaves]

Originally Posted by TheNTGuy

BMW 760LI > S65 AMG & S63 AMG
No M needed for the 7 series

TheNTGuy

BMW sucks, never ever say some piece of crap bimmer is better than a S65 AMG

 

[bananaboy2601]

Originally Posted by Vancity74

Originally Posted by BananaBoy2601

AMG product vs a non-M BMW...what?!

What?!
An Alpina B7 pitted against an AMG S-class is a fair comparison. An AMG vs a non-M on the other hand..