A little help

[antalonboubmpo]

Which would you buy a pair of bred 2001 XIs in your proper size or a pair of bred 1996 XIs .5 size smaller than your normal size both DS?
But the 01s are $10 more than the 96s

 

[prison mike]

Personally, I'd go with the 2001's. I'm not a fan of the white lining under the patent leather of the og's and definitely not a fan of buying shoes that are not my size. If you don't plan on wearing them, then obviously get he '96s.

Side note:

, haven't seen you post in a LONG time.

 

[eltouha]

i did scoop an b/r og xi in a .5 size smaller than my usual just last year. just took out the insole and they're fine.

 

[airjordan23z]

Originally Posted by prison mike

Personally, I'd go with the 2001's. I'm not a fan of the white lining under the patent leather of the og's and definitely not a fan of buying shoes that are not my size. If you don't plan on wearing them, then obviously get he '96s.

Side note:

, haven't seen you post in a LONG time.

agreed.. wearing shoes without insoles suck and uncomfortable

 

[lil black jean jacket]

hmm, I'd go with 96's bro. maybe it's just me but a half size up or down ain't that bad to me. I can fit 10.5-11.5 so I'm basically an 11

 

[eltouha]

Originally Posted by airjordan23z

Originally Posted by prison mike

Personally, I'd go with the 2001's. I'm not a fan of the white lining under the patent leather of the og's and definitely not a fan of buying shoes that are not my size. If you don't plan on wearing them, then obviously get he '96s.



Side note:

, haven't seen you post in a LONG time.

agreed.. wearing shoes without insoles suck and uncomfortable

nah, xis are real soft either way.

 

[rcjbbp1313]

wow for the price i would go with the OGs, they are more comfy and worth way more DS.

 

[rich24smith]

ogs too depending on condition