A random thought....Vol. Just thinking mann..

[supafly122]

This probably should of went in the random thought thread but this probably deserve its own.
I dont smoke either..

So let's say there are identical twin sisters, we'll call them 1a and 1b.
So let's say there are identical twin brothers, we'll call them 2a and 2b.

Now let's say 1a and 2a have a child, and 1b and 2b have a child...Would their kids be identical?

..

Come on NT
I'm 10 steps ahead

 

[bdis1986]

-bdis-

 

[iblink]

I've thought about that before.

 

[jjsrf]

im sure the chance of that happening are very, very slim, mixing of the chromosomes is mostly random with a dominate or recessive trait here or there

 

[tmukg21]

we built the Random Thought thread for a reason.

 

[randomhero1985]

They might look related, but not identical, because each child would acquire different characteristics and each would have a different emphasis on differentfeatures.

 

[momoney848]

Make one of those chromosome matrices.

I'm sure that they wouldn't get the exact same chromosomes so they might look like brothers or brother/sister but they wouldn't look exactly thesame.

 

[primavera vills]

Hahahaha maybe.

 

[thytkerjobs]

Originally Posted by iBlink

I've thought about that before.

yo tambien.

 

[the sole full 1]

 

[litlbibby]

Originally Posted by The Sole Full 1

 

[iblink]

thytkerjobs wrote:

---

iBlink wrote:

---

I've thought about that before.
yo tambien.

That's a sign. It's becoming more and more apparent...

�

��

 

[nktran001]

Originally Posted by litlbibby

Originally Posted by The Sole Full 1

 

[thytkerjobs]

Originally Posted by iBlink

thytkerjobs wrote:

---

iBlink wrote:

---

I've thought about that before.

yo tambien.

That's a sign. It's becoming more and more apparent...

I don't believe in signs

 

[ouch my feet]

No.

They may have similar features but nothing like the identical twins.

 

[produccionfrescos]

 

[krazy]

It's like fraternal twins, they don't share the same set of chromosomes.

 

[iblink]

thytkerjobs wrote:

---

Originally Posted by iBlink

thytkerjobs wrote:

---

iBlink wrote:

---

I've thought about that before.

yo tambien.

That's a sign an indication. It's becoming more and more apparent...

I don't believe in signs

Fixed.

 

[thytkerjobs]

Originally Posted by ProduccionFrescos

stop editing your posts.

 

[ryanbbn1]

What you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even closeto anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God havemercy on your soul.

 

[viintage]

it's not gauranteed but the probability is much higher

 

[produccionfrescos]

Originally Posted by thytkerjobs

Originally Posted by ProduccionFrescos

stop editing your posts.

 

[imaballerballer]

i've thought about this too. but i think the chances of them being identical would be unlikely because it's just like if a normal couple had a child,and then another. how often is it that 2 siblings look just alike?

 

[ssjjfar]

Originally Posted by imaballerballer

i've thought about this too. but i think the chances of them being identical would be unlikely because it's just like if a normal couple had a child, and then another. how often is it that 2 siblings look just alike?

Exactly, don't remember the odds but I remember my biology teacher in the class I took over summer said that the probability of two parentspassing along the exact same traits to different children born at different times is never.

 

[snake201]

Originally Posted by Ryanbbn1

What you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

+1