- Mar 14, 2016
- 362
- 115
what's different about these? just have sample tag?Managed to grab a sample from goat. Today's a good day. [emoji]128526[/emoji]
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
what's different about these? just have sample tag?Managed to grab a sample from goat. Today's a good day. [emoji]128526[/emoji]
Shoes aren't even green though
In honor of St. Patrick
Same. My size 10/10.5. Never had a chance.
Still like RC version 1 and not the upcoming R2D2-C3P0.
Shoes aren't even green though
In honor of St. Patrick
Tank stay flexin, you must be down south or out on the west coast somewhere. UB wear is currently suspended here in NY till sanitation gets these mini iceburgs off the sidewalks.
In honor of St. Patrick
You never had a Shamrock Shake?Shoes aren't even green though
I get where you're coming from. To me the firmer knit of the 1.0 is part of the reason I got into boost to begin with. I still remember trying on the CB 1.0 and being in awe of the comfort and stability.
I prefer a looser fit but interestingly enough, TB 3.0's are just as tight as 1.0's. I don't understand it.
pretty much lol.
what's different about these? just have sample tag?
Finally have both WM EQT and turbo red EQT in hand to compare sizing and materials.
TR wins IMO overall. The side suede panel is softer with embossed labeling, 3M tongue label, and soft felt-like collar and under lining. The lace loops on the top are plastic so you can tie the laces tight without wrinkling or stretching out the holes, unlike the WMs. Also the insole is thicker on the TR.
Underneath, the WM has a hard flat foam that is thick so you can't feel the boost and creases at the flexing point, whereas, the TR has that soft felt-like material.
Both are size 10.5 which is my UB1.0 size.
Hope this helps.
Leave him alone, he's not thinking straight the man has been job hunting for a while@gordyloc we fam but that's green. A lighter shade of green though.
You never had a Shamrock Shake?
AQUA@gordyloc we fam but that's green. A lighter shade of green though.
Leave him alone, he's not thinking straight the man has been job hunting for a while
I also vote the WM EQT is nicer overall. I think it has nicer details like the suede patch on the medial side, white leather traingular heel tab etc. Wish it had a black outsole though because the white gets destroyed instantly lolagreed to what you have said, but i also wanna add another opinion here:
The insole is thinner so it feels more true to size than the TR. Hence why many ppl had the "false" expression that they need half size up then after a few wears, the thicker insole molded to your feet. Also they feel exactly the same, i swap them out and walk 1 foot with the thicker, the other with the thinner one, cant tell the difference as they are both extremely comfortable
the side panel is more rigid on the WM so the shoes feel more support than the TR
The tongue label is a much nicer touch and my fav feature of the WM since you can tug the laces through them and shows the logos. Also its suede and beats 3m in term of quality material imo
Dude...gimme a ******* break. It's mint green.AQUA
thanksUS sizes 6.5 & 7.5 in the Trace Cargos
https://www.jdsports.co.uk/product/utility-grey-green-adidas-ultra-boost/244157/
also , yes the padding underneath the insole is different. But to say you cant feel the boost is ridiculous and way over exaggerating. Maybe there are ppl that can tell the difference, but i really can't.
I also vote the WM EQT is nicer overall. I think it has nicer details like the suede patch on the medial side, white leather traingular heel tab etc. Wish it had a black outsole though because the white gets destroyed instantly lol
I see they sold for 1600
If I can convince him to accept 1K cash straight up I just might do it
After all the money that would be eaten up after fees it can't be that off from what he'd actually be receiving after anyway