- Mar 29, 2001
- 22,212
- 70,293
2000’s weren’t bad at all
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I’m talking from the “special box” retros2000’s weren’t bad at all
I guess we shouldn't be nitpicking Gentry could have always given us something like this and dubbed them P.E's
Buying a pair with 23 already on them is sinking low how? Explain. Sinking low is applying alcohol and nail polish remover and screen printing a 23 and ironing them back on because it hurt your eyes that much to see a 45 on them that’s sinking low my friend.
You'd sink that low because of a little number on the back?
Lol tell me about it. This dude said I was sinking low because instead of screenprinting a 23, I’ll pick up both December pair and the 23 from 2011 problem solved45 is really annoying people to the point to actually remove the font for a new screenprint? yooo I see y'all December man. This thread is jokes.
No45 is really annoying people to the point to actually remove the font for a new screenprint? yooo I see y'all December man. This thread is jokes.
Lord... also the get money boys2011 concords were historic for one thing: the exposure of air randy, marquee sole, vmv and others selling early unauthorized pairs. Remember the whole "milky toe" fiasco?
Questions are mad hard to discolor tho, og 11s turned piss yellow like someone wit diabetesOG had some blue milk soles. These days the blue soles they use be like the ones they use on reebok questions.
Lol tell me about it. This dude said I was sinking low because instead of screenprinting a 23, I’ll pick up both December pair and the 23 from 2011 problem solved
Same time people were still copping space jams thinking they were legit2011 concords were historic for one thing: the exposure of air randy, marquee sole, vmv and others selling early unauthorized pairs. Remember the whole "milky toe" fiasco?