- Apr 22, 2002
- 3,563
- 509
They're rockable...shorts only though...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That first one with a red Jumpman might be it..
I always thought the 2009 had mad potential. Had wished they blocked a pair as a black-toe colorway. I looked at the white pair multiple times in stores when they were out and later regretted not getting a pair. The silly weird heel design is what always stopped me.The 2009s, albeit weird looking, are quite pleasant, in retrospect.
yup me to. Came across a pair at Ross for $69 once and still passed on em lolI always thought the 2009 had mad potential. Had wished they blocked a pair as a black-toe colorway. I looked at the white pair multiple times in stores when they were out and later regretted not getting a pair. The silly weird heel design is what always stopped me.
I always thought the 2009 had mad potential. Had wished they blocked a pair as a black-toe colorway. I looked at the white pair multiple times in stores when they were out and later regretted not getting a pair. The silly weird heel design is what always stopped me.
I honestly think they will do the red Jumpman, with the circle done in the purple aquatone and grey that will tie it to the original Aqua colorway, as for the shoe black on black , the silver section will likely be what they called grey, in the bottom instead of the siren red, I believe they will go purple, and around the mud guard/ missile they will go with Aquatone and purple accents , as well as all the test on the shoe being purple
^ ExactlyNot bad but nothing special
I always thought the 2009 had mad potential. Had wished they blocked a pair as a black-toe colorway. I looked at the white pair multiple times in stores when they were out and later regretted not getting a pair. The silly weird heel design is what always stopped me.
yup me to. Came across a pair at Ross for $69 once and still passed on em lol
Actually, the more I look at it and the more I realize this heel embodies the Jordan "prestige", i.e. the fact they're always going above and beyond in terms of technology to justify charging ≈200 dollars a shoe. Also its sharpness blends well with the kryptonite fragment on the collar, I think.
Actually, the more I look at it and the more I realize this heel embodies the Jordan "prestige", i.e. the fact they're always going above and beyond in terms of technology to justify charging ≈200 dollars a shoe. Also its sharpness blends well with the kryptonite fragment on the collar, I think.
Thought these may have had potential but the more i view these the more hideous they looking
I really like them but I kinda regret how monotonous basketball sneakers have been for the past 15 years or so. It's always the same knit, always the same flat-ish out and midsoles (except for the zoom freaks, they be curvy), and overall it seems like a giant game of "spot the differences".Thought these may have had potential but the more i view these the more hideous they looking
That's what I paid at Marshalls. I almost didn't get them either, but I talked myself into it. Been going strong with the unhealthy obsession ever since.yup me to. Came across a pair at Ross for $69 once and still passed on em lol
That heel was super ugly. I want to forget about the AJ 2009. I will say this, I do remember that the designer of the shoe had his hands tied by Jordan Brand. It wasn’t his complete vision of the sneaker and what he wanted to release.I always thought the 2009 had mad potential. Had wished they blocked a pair as a black-toe colorway. I looked at the white pair multiple times in stores when they were out and later regretted not getting a pair. The silly weird heel design is what always stopped me.
Mayden right?That heel was super ugly. I want to forget about the AJ 2009. I will say this, I do remember that the designer of the shoe had his hands tied by Jordan Brand. It wasn’t his complete vision of the sneaker and what he wanted to release.
Right.Mayden right?
Really? I think they went ultra premium with the shoe’s material, which was why they limited the quantity and colorways. I recall when explaining the number change it was their idea to turn the ‘game shoe’ into something more sacred and rarely seen on select athletes. I wonder what was left on the table.That heel was super ugly. I want to forget about the AJ 2009. I will say this, I do remember that the designer of the shoe had his hands tied by Jordan Brand. It wasn’t his complete vision of the sneaker and what he wanted to release.