All Roads Lead To Tallahassee ... (Stand Your Ground)

Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
27,111
Reaction score
14,584
[h1][/h1][h1]  [/h1][h1]Rally against 'Stand Your Ground’ law to be held by family of Trayvon Martin, Rev. Al Sharpton[/h1]
Tallahassee, Fla. (WTXL)  -- Rev. Al Sharpton and the National Action Network are putting their feet down and will be rallying over the ‘stand your ground’ law by marching from the Civic Center to the State Capitol on Monday morning.

The parents of Trayvon Martin will also be in attendance, along with their attorneys.

Upon arriving at the Capitol, Rev. Sharpton will give the keynote address and speakers will discuss the dangers of the ‘stand your ground’ law along with the inequalities showcased in cases that it has been argued.

The march begins promptly at 9:30am on Monday, March 10 at the Tallahassee Leon County Civic Center.

http://www.wtxl.com/news/rally-agai...cle_5de2a816-a3e6-11e3-b69d-0017a43b2370.html
 
I would like to see more than just a rally done, but I applaud the effort of those that will be participating. 
 
776.013 Home protection; use of deadly force; presumption of fear of death or great bodily harm.—
(1) A person is presumed to have held a reasonable fear of imminent peril of death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another when using defensive force that is intended or likely to cause death or great bodily harm to another if:
(a) The person against whom the defensive force was used was in the process of unlawfully and forcefully entering, or had unlawfully and forcibly entered, a dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle, or if that person had removed or was attempting to remove another against that person’s will from the dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle; and
(b) The person who uses defensive force knew or had reason to believe that an unlawful and forcible entry or unlawful and forcible act was occurring or had occurred.
(2) The presumption set forth in subsection (1) does not apply if:
(a) The person against whom the defensive force is used has the right to be in or is a lawful resident of the dwelling, residence, or vehicle, such as an owner, lessee, or titleholder, and there is not an injunction for protection from domestic violence or a written pretrial supervision order of no contact against that person; or
(b) The person or persons sought to be removed is a child or grandchild, or is otherwise in the lawful custody or under the lawful guardianship of, the person against whom the defensive force is used; or
(c) The person who uses defensive force is engaged in an unlawful activity or is using the dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle to further an unlawful activity; or
(d) The person against whom the defensive force is used is a law enforcement officer, as defined in s. 943.10(14), who enters or attempts to enter a dwelling, residence, or vehicle in the performance of his or her official duties and the officer identified himself or herself in accordance with any applicable law or the person using force knew or reasonably should have known that the person entering or attempting to enter was a law enforcement officer.
(3) A person who is not engaged in an unlawful activity and who is attacked in any other place where he or she has a right to be has no duty to retreat and has the right to stand his or her ground and meet force with force, including deadly force if he or she reasonably believes it is necessary to do so to prevent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the commission of a forcible felony.
(4) A person who unlawfully and by force enters or attempts to enter a person’s dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle is presumed to be doing so with the intent to commit an unlawful act involving force or violence.
(5) As used in this section, the term:
(a) “Dwelling” means a building or conveyance of any kind, including any attached porch, whether the building or conveyance is temporary or permanent, mobile or immobile, which has a roof over it, including a tent, and is designed to be occupied by people lodging therein at night.
(b) “Residence” means a dwelling in which a person resides either temporarily or permanently or is visiting as an invited guest.
(c) “Vehicle” means a conveyance of any kind, whether or not motorized, which is designed to transport people or property.
History.—s. 1, ch. 2005-27.

Here's the actual statute, for those interested.

Btw 'presumption' mean it is assumed, I.e you have to prove whatever presumed is more likely than not false, and your point (in criminal) beyond a reasonable doubt is true as opposed to where there is no presumption which means you just have to prove (in criminal) your point is true beyond a reasonable doubt...trust 'presumption' is game changer.
 
Last edited:
Again, my race only wanting to band together when another race is perceived to be the guilty party. Where's the really for all of the senseless black on black killings? Cats get a hard on for any type of injustice.

The extremists regarding this case is what bothers me the most. They say "he killed an innocent young boy", but leave out the fact that the boy was serving him that Kimbo slice/mayweather collabo, allegedly trying to kill the eventual shooter. Regardless of the reason, pretty much anyone that's getting their butt kicked to the point where they feel they're life is in jeopardy (assuming this is true, I'm annoyed at the fact that the killer wasn't required to testify) will use a firearm, if they have one. So much grey area in this situation. Zimmerman shouldve testified. It's common sense... Oh, I forgot, it's not the "law".
 
Back
Top Bottom