- Jun 6, 2005
- 1,603
- 10
Best Math Equation Ever
- Thread in 'General' Thread starter Started by cronicmolemolereturns,
- Start date
- Sep 24, 2002
- 7,349
- 243
Yo look out for my dude Columbus. He's gonna do big things you heard it here first!
- Sep 24, 2002
- 7,349
- 243
Yo look out for my dude Columbus. He's gonna do big things you heard it here first!
- Apr 25, 2005
- 8,065
- 118
"A pregnant girl's period. That is how late you are."
- Apr 25, 2005
- 8,065
- 118
"A pregnant girl's period. That is how late you are."
- Jul 30, 2009
- 4,849
- 10
It is safe to say your stupidity knows no bounds. Therefore the range = (-∞,∞)
- Jul 30, 2009
- 4,849
- 10
It is safe to say your stupidity knows no bounds. Therefore the range = (-∞,∞)
- Nov 20, 2009
- 2,590
- 36
- Nov 20, 2009
- 2,590
- 36
- Feb 8, 2009
- 20,136
- 11,144
Originally Posted by Oh YoU MaD
I never seen this before. This and the one with expanding the equation have me damn near in tears.
- Feb 8, 2009
- 20,136
- 11,144
Originally Posted by Oh YoU MaD
I never seen this before. This and the one with expanding the equation have me damn near in tears.
- Aug 23, 2007
- 16,979
- 10,486
LOLLLL
- Aug 23, 2007
- 16,979
- 10,486
LOLLLL
- Oct 18, 2006
- 975
- 10
man wish i knew about these while i was in school
- Oct 18, 2006
- 975
- 10
man wish i knew about these while i was in school
- May 3, 2010
- 645
- 10
WTH, this takes algebra II logic. Show me some real life application of the Riemmann's Hypothesis and then this would be the best equation ever.
- May 3, 2010
- 645
- 10
WTH, this takes algebra II logic. Show me some real life application of the Riemmann's Hypothesis and then this would be the best equation ever.
- Nov 21, 2007
- 4,603
- 30
technically in the last equation wouldn't you have to square both sides of the equation ? so wouldn't women^2 = problems? hahahaha
- Nov 21, 2007
- 4,603
- 30
technically in the last equation wouldn't you have to square both sides of the equation ? so wouldn't women^2 = problems? hahahaha
- Apr 1, 2009
- 18,297
- 1,007
Originally Posted by SiMPLYDiMPLY
technically in the last equation wouldn't you have to square both sides of the equation ? so wouldn't women^2 = problems? hahahaha
no. because previously it said women equal money squared.
so there ya go
- Apr 1, 2009
- 18,297
- 1,007
Originally Posted by SiMPLYDiMPLY
technically in the last equation wouldn't you have to square both sides of the equation ? so wouldn't women^2 = problems? hahahaha
no. because previously it said women equal money squared.
so there ya go
- May 3, 2010
- 645
- 10
That would make it worse. Which is probably more correct than saying each woman brings only 1 problem.Originally Posted by SiMPLYDiMPLY
technically in the last equation wouldn't you have to square both sides of the equation ? so wouldn't women^2 = problems? hahahaha
If there are 2 women, there are 4 problems.
If there are 10 women there are 100 problems.
damn... not enough women to blame our problems on...
- May 3, 2010
- 645
- 10
That would make it worse. Which is probably more correct than saying each woman brings only 1 problem.Originally Posted by SiMPLYDiMPLY
technically in the last equation wouldn't you have to square both sides of the equation ? so wouldn't women^2 = problems? hahahaha
If there are 2 women, there are 4 problems.
If there are 10 women there are 100 problems.
damn... not enough women to blame our problems on...
- Nov 21, 2007
- 4,603
- 30
ahhhh i see kinda-> omgitswes
im trying to logically understand this but im a little drunk so its not really working. ... tomoro
im trying to logically understand this but im a little drunk so its not really working. ... tomoro
- Nov 21, 2007
- 4,603
- 30
ahhhh i see kinda-> omgitswes
im trying to logically understand this but im a little drunk so its not really working. ... tomoro
im trying to logically understand this but im a little drunk so its not really working. ... tomoro
