- 36,170
- 5,756
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2007
pwned.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
v&Originally Posted by Ryda421
i just called with a death threat
hmmm... sounds a lot like how the owners of the World Trade Center mysteriously having the whole building insured against terrorist attacks before 9/11Originally Posted by devildog1776
1. Oil rig owner has made $270 million off the oil leak
Transocean Ltd., the owner of the Deepwater Horizon rig leased by BP, has been flying under the radar in the mainstream blame game. The worldâs largest offshore drilling contractor, the company is conveniently headquartered in corporate-friendly Switzerland, and itâs no stranger to oil disasters. In 1979, an oil well it was drilling in the very same Gulf of Mexico ignited, sending the drill platform into the sea and causing one of the largest oil spills by the time it was capped⦠nine months later.
This experience undoubtedly influenced Transoceanâs decision to insure the Deepwater Horizon rig for about twice what it was worth. In a conference call to analysts earlier this month, Transocean reported making a $270 million profit from insurance payouts after the disaster. Itâs not hard to bet on failure when you know itâs somewhat assured.
2. BP has a terrible safety record
BP has a long record of oil-related disasters in the United States. In 2005, BPâs Texas City refinery exploded, killing 15 workers and injuring another 170. The next year, one of its Alaska pipelines leaked 200,000 gallons of crude oil. According to Public Citizen, BP has paid $550 million in fines. BP seems to particularly enjoy violating the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts, and has paid the two largest fines in the Occupational Safety and Health Administrationâs history. (Is it any surprise that BP played a central, though greatly under-reported, role in the failure to contain the Exxon-Valdez spill years earlier?)
With Deepwater Horizon, BP didnât break its dismal trend. In addition to choosing a cheaper â and less safe â casing to outfit the well that eventually burst, the company chose not to equip Deepwater Horizon with an acoustic trigger, a last-resort option that could have shut down the well even if it was damaged badly, and which is required in most developed countries that allow offshore drilling. In fact, BP employs these devices in its rigs located near England, but because the United States recommends rather than requires them, BP had no incentive to buy one â even though they only cost $500,000.
This is why I'm pissed. You know what they force oil companies to do in Canada?
Canada forces oil companies to drill a relief well right next to the exploratory well.
This might cost the company twice as much, but it would allow them to depressurize
a gushing pipe in one day, not 38.
it had nothing to do with the fact that it had been attacked before that. nope.Originally Posted by spsfinest212
hmmm... sounds a lot like how the owners of the World Trade Center mysteriously having the whole building insured against terrorist attacks before 9/11Originally Posted by devildog1776
1. Oil rig owner has made $270 million off the oil leak
Transocean Ltd., the owner of the Deepwater Horizon rig leased by BP, has been flying under the radar in the mainstream blame game. The worldâs largest offshore drilling contractor, the company is conveniently headquartered in corporate-friendly Switzerland, and itâs no stranger to oil disasters. In 1979, an oil well it was drilling in the very same Gulf of Mexico ignited, sending the drill platform into the sea and causing one of the largest oil spills by the time it was capped⦠nine months later.
This experience undoubtedly influenced Transoceanâs decision to insure the Deepwater Horizon rig for about twice what it was worth. In a conference call to analysts earlier this month, Transocean reported making a $270 million profit from insurance payouts after the disaster. Itâs not hard to bet on failure when you know itâs somewhat assured.
*tinfoil hat blown off by logic*Originally Posted by In Yo Nostril
it had nothing to do with the fact that it had been attacked before that. nope.Originally Posted by spsfinest212
hmmm... sounds a lot like how the owners of the World Trade Center mysteriously having the whole building insured against terrorist attacks before 9/11Originally Posted by devildog1776
1. Oil rig owner has made $270 million off the oil leak
Transocean Ltd., the owner of the Deepwater Horizon rig leased by BP, has been flying under the radar in the mainstream blame game. The worldâs largest offshore drilling contractor, the company is conveniently headquartered in corporate-friendly Switzerland, and itâs no stranger to oil disasters. In 1979, an oil well it was drilling in the very same Gulf of Mexico ignited, sending the drill platform into the sea and causing one of the largest oil spills by the time it was capped⦠nine months later.
This experience undoubtedly influenced Transoceanâs decision to insure the Deepwater Horizon rig for about twice what it was worth. In a conference call to analysts earlier this month, Transocean reported making a $270 million profit from insurance payouts after the disaster. Itâs not hard to bet on failure when you know itâs somewhat assured.
Originally Posted by moneyisthemotive
does anyone have a list of all the companies owned/operated/pushed by BP? im sure its extensive but i will do my part to try and steer clear ...
Originally Posted by APLX2
I sent him a nice email.
Originally Posted by WallyHopp
thats ugly.. It doesnt seem like anyone in the government cares... except for the $$$ handouts.
reminds me of Mansanto.. They are just as evil
Originally Posted by TeamJordan79
@ boycott
like the other oil companies are any different
Originally Posted by swizzc
LOL at you guys thinking a "boycott" or personal emails can effect ANYTHING that happens at that corporation. ignorance.