- 6,720
- 76
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2007
Speech was pretty heart-felt. Congrats to D Rose.
Breaking News: Derrick Rose named 2010-2011 MVP
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by zack54attack,
- Start date
- 6,720
- 76
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2007
Speech was pretty heart-felt. Congrats to D Rose.
- 5,983
- 533
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2004
Definitely deserves it. The acceptance speech was great!
- 5,983
- 533
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2004
Definitely deserves it. The acceptance speech was great!
- 1,859
- 14
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2008
too big + too strong + too fast = D-Rose is too good, lol
- 1,859
- 14
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2008
too big + too strong + too fast = D-Rose is too good, lol
- 794
- 10
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2010
The points per 100 possessions stat is the one that gets me.
Bulls are only 1.49 points per 100 possessions better with Rose on the court than with him off.
That is absolutely
for an MVP.
Bulls are only 1.49 points per 100 possessions better with Rose on the court than with him off.
That is absolutely
- 794
- 10
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2010
The points per 100 possessions stat is the one that gets me.
Bulls are only 1.49 points per 100 possessions better with Rose on the court than with him off.
That is absolutely
for an MVP.
Bulls are only 1.49 points per 100 possessions better with Rose on the court than with him off.
That is absolutely
- 8,131
- 618
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2007
Man yall can stuff those stats you know where
Rose is your NBA MVP this year dammit!
Rose is your NBA MVP this year dammit!
- 8,131
- 618
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2007
Man yall can stuff those stats you know where
Rose is your NBA MVP this year dammit!
Rose is your NBA MVP this year dammit!
- 1,026
- 167
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2003
Originally Posted by MzD650
The points per 100 possessions stat is the one that gets me.
Bulls are only 1.49 points per 100 possessions better with Rose on the court than with him off.
That is absolutelyfor an MVP.
Fool there bench d was better than the starting d ....of course its gonna be better...
- 1,026
- 167
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2003
Originally Posted by MzD650
The points per 100 possessions stat is the one that gets me.
Bulls are only 1.49 points per 100 possessions better with Rose on the court than with him off.
That is absolutelyfor an MVP.
Fool there bench d was better than the starting d ....of course its gonna be better...
- 3,076
- 445
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2002
New age stats nerds got me lol over. What the world are you talking about?
- 3,076
- 445
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2002
New age stats nerds got me lol over. What the world are you talking about?
- 354
- 11
- Joined
- May 18, 2005
next up.. MVP of the championship
- 354
- 11
- Joined
- May 18, 2005
next up.. MVP of the championship
Bend_The_Knee
formerly gotholesinmysocks
- 61,426
- 23,140
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2008
Bend_The_Knee
formerly gotholesinmysocks
- 61,426
- 23,140
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2008
- 8,941
- 5,398
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2005
- 8,941
- 5,398
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2005
- 794
- 10
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2010
Originally Posted by assyrianplaya
Originally Posted by MzD650
The points per 100 possessions stat is the one that gets me.
Bulls are only 1.49 points per 100 possessions better with Rose on the court than with him off.
That is absolutelyfor an MVP.
Fool there bench d was better than the starting d ....of course its gonna be better...
Not sure how that helps your argument bro.
Nor am I sure why the need for insults.
- 794
- 10
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2010
Originally Posted by assyrianplaya
Originally Posted by MzD650
The points per 100 possessions stat is the one that gets me.
Bulls are only 1.49 points per 100 possessions better with Rose on the court than with him off.
That is absolutelyfor an MVP.
Fool there bench d was better than the starting d ....of course its gonna be better...
Not sure how that helps your argument bro.
Nor am I sure why the need for insults.
- 1,809
- 238
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2007
It's still way too early with NBA stats to see which of the new age ones make sense. It's just the baseball geeks trying to validate their over analyzation of a sport. I think I just made a new word.
- 1,809
- 238
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2007
It's still way too early with NBA stats to see which of the new age ones make sense. It's just the baseball geeks trying to validate their over analyzation of a sport. I think I just made a new word.
- 2,950
- 10
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2008
No you didn't. It's a nominalization of analyze. You also could have been a normal person and used over-analysis.
So "baseball geeks" are the ones that use advanced stats? So in baseball are Theo and Billy "baseball geeks"?