RustyShackleford
Supporter
- 63,964
- 191,884
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2009
.And the goal post move again. Now it is onto a strawman
I mean, you're literate right? You know how to read? I said, not everyone that perished during 9/11 were good/upstanding people. If you truly think the odds of all the 1,000+ who perished had never done any wrongdoings in life, you and others are mistaken.
doesn't mean they had to have a plane fly into their workplace and die a flaming death though
& yeah...
All four — Arian Foster, Jelani Jenkins, Michael Thomas and Kenny Stills — held a hand over their hearts as the national anthem played.
http://www.nbcmiami.com/news/local/...s-Kneel-During-National-Anthem-393042511.html
i thought they were disrespecting da flag though...
catching all that flak & they just hedged just like da Seahawks.
oh really?
last time i checked i said.
Entire Seahawks team will interlock their arms and stand up during the National Anthem:
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap30...eahawks-to-stand-interlock-arms-during-anthem
told ya...they dont want that 9/11 backlash... even da implied perception of disrespectfulness to da flag on da 15th anniversary of da attacks would've been tasteless.
goal post is pretty much cemented..now what?![]()
So your proof is a previous post of yours
uhh, duh..thats how this game works...u failed at ur narrative and now u posting gifs...good job [emoji]128077[/emoji][emoji]133674693112[/emoji]
1. Who assumed they were all upstanding or good people?
2. Why does this even matter?
3. How would this impact that way we grieve collectively as a nation?
4. What level of individual evil or immorality would justify or warrant death?
Idiotic and inappropriate through and through.
Just like how they've grieved for the thousands of innocent Black people who've been lynch in the states, too?
Do we really believe all those black people that got lynched were good upstanding people?
your logic not mine
got em
You sound stupid as ******* hell.
Talking about because you built a straw man in the past, that means you have adequate proof to declare yourself the winner of an argument. So what, I'm suppose to use logical fallacies to argue against your logical fallacies, because that's how the game works
![SMH :smh: :smh:](/styles/default/xenforo/NTemojis/smh.gif)
![Laugh :lol: :lol:](/styles/default/xenforo/NTemojis/laugh.gif)
Why would I need to do that? Reality is on my side
Like how many times do you need to embarrass yourself today before you shut up
Last edited: