Concords Legit Check.....

[chronicsneaker]

Do these look straight?

 

[knights23]

yes legit GM pair

 

[timmybrixxx]

GM so i would say NO they are not legit. Just good replicas IMO.

 

[knights23]

GM so i would say NO they are not legit. Just good replicas IMO.

I love how you use the caps lock. OP These shoes are made with the exact same materials that release day pair are made with. Making them legit. A replica is making an item look like another item see link below.

 http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Lamb...ars_Trucks&hash=item27d464d6f5#ht_2368wt_1165

You see they made a Pontiac look like a Lambo

These shoes were made in the same factory that made release day pair with the same materials making them Legit Grey Market Pair

OP you would not call a lambo looking like a lambo a replica would you.

 

[timmybrixxx]

These shoes were made in the same factory that made release day pair with the same materials making them Legit Grey Market Pair

PROVE this or go away!

 

[rapcoz2134]

I love how you use the caps lock. OP These shoes are made with the exact same materials that release day pair are made with. Making them legit. A replica is making an item look like another item see link below.
 http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Lamb...ars_Trucks&hash=item27d464d6f5#ht_2368wt_1165


You see they made a Pontiac look like a Lambo

These shoes were made in the same factory that made release day pair with the same materials making them Legit Grey Market Pair

OP you would not call a lambo looking like a lambo a replica would you.

If Lamborghini didn't authorize said Lambo to be manufactured, yes, I would indeed call it a replica.

 

[timmybrixxx]

If Lamborghini didn't authorize said Lambo to be manufactured, yes, I would indeed call it a replica.

AMEN!!!!!!

 

[knights23]

These shoes were made in the same factory that made release day pair with the same materials making them Legit Grey Market Pair

PROVE this or go away!

OK I WILL

You PROVE IT IN EVERY GM response you have ever posted. The only thing you have to tell you this shoe is not RD is that the soles are not yellow. NOT ONCE have you ever mentioned Carbon being fake or leather not being real.  NIKE stays on top of things like this, If they are willin6g to send a Trade Mark infringement letter to a guy selling 4 pairs of fake shoes a month on ebay they are gong to stop the sale of unauthorized shoes being made. Unless they are getting a cut????????? Nike is not a good company they have had countless lawsuits against them. Watch this and know that they made 4 billion last year.



now on to my proof!

The Patent Leather is the same!

The leather is the same !

The carbon Fiber is the same!

The rubber is the same!

Im still waiting for you to prove to me they are not! 

 

[Bert.]

everything on the shoes is the same but these were most likely made after the initial release. the soles are wayy too blue.

my ndc pair was never that blue

 

[knights23]

If Lamborghini didn't authorize said Lambo to be manufactured, yes, I would indeed call it a repliTry to sell

Try to sell 5 pair of Fakes on Ebay 

1. Nike will buy one of these pairs under a fake name you will send the shoes to Oregon 

2. The next day Ebay will close your account 

3. You will receive a certified letter from Nike stating that you are infringing upon there trademark by selling fake shoes. 

4. They will offer you the option to stop selling these shoes with no penalties at all

5. They will threaten you with  jail time if you do not stop.

thats off of 5 pairs that  friend sold on ebay

Now ,dont you think they would jump all over someone selling IDENTICAL shoes! but they dont and we still see thousands of these shoes becoming available every day.  if they are not doing anything to stop it then they must be getting a cut of the profit.

They are after all a company that pays its workers 6 dollars a day to build shoes that sell for 200+

 

[timmybrixxx]

OK I WILL

You PROVE IT IN EVERY GM response you have ever posted. The only thing you have to tell you this shoe is not RD is that the soles are not yellow. NOT ONCE have you ever mentioned Carbon being fake or leather not being real.  NIKE stays on top of things like this, If they are willin6g to send a Trade Mark infringement letter to a guy selling 4 pairs of fake shoes a month on ebay they are gong to stop the sale of unauthorized shoes being made. Unless they are getting a cut????????? Nike is not a good company they have had countless lawsuits against them. Watch this and know that they made 4 billion last year.



now on to my proof!

The Patent Leather is the same!

The leather is the same !

The carbon Fiber is the same!

The rubber is the same!

Im still waiting for you to prove to me they are not! 

dude thats not carbon fiber its weaved plastic, the leather is a pretty cheap part of the construction.. its in the air units and the guts.. you cant tell people ITS THE SAME if it has not been proven to be.. something may look like carbon fiber but its not, something may look like pylon but its not something may look like good quality leather and not be etc., feel me? Man if it wasnt different we couldnt point out the differences! jesus Im done arguing with you.

the burdon of proof is not for me to prove it for you GM guys

 

[knights23]

dude thats not carbon fiber its weaved plastic, the leather is a pretty cheap part of the construction.. its in the air units and the guts.. you cant tell people ITS THE SAME if it has not been proven to be.. something may look like carbon fiber but its not, something may look like pylon but its not something may look like good quality leather and not be etc., feel me? Man if it wasnt different we couldnt point out the differences! jesus Im done arguing with you.

the burdon of proof is not for me to prove it for you GM guys

IM NOT YOUR DUDE

You have no idea what you are talking about!  Weaved plastic hahahahahahahaha do you mean woven its not womans hair? Please prove to me it is "weaved Plastic" it looks nothing like plastic nothing at all.  just give up you do not know the XIs plain and simple. I can tell the people its the same because it is the same. and yes it has been proven to be. the Air units you mention are on a video shot in 2008 long before GM were ever mentioned.

YOU CAN NOT POINT OUT THE DIFFERENCE YOU GO BY THE COLOR OF THE SOLES THATS IT !!!!!!! THATS ALL YOU DO. YOU THEN MAKE UP CRAP ABOUT THE REST OF THE SHOE NOT BEING PERFECT!!!!!!!!

 

[knights23]

Dude you make my head hurt-your an idiot...NIKE does not pay those employees, its contracted to a company in china etc....NIKE pay the "sweatshop" owner that pays HIS employees 6 dollars a day!!!! thats the way it is man, If you could get someone to wash your car for $1 instead of $10 wouldnt you? And a lawsuit to sue a factory in another country VS some A**hole on Ebay is 2 different things all together.. Diff laws, months of research, records etc.

What ever you have to tell your self I guess all these links are lies 

http://articles.latimes.com/2003/sep/13/business/fi-nike13

http://www.voanews.com/content/nike-to-pay-indonesian-workers-1-million--137173608/150598.html

http://reclaimdemocracy.org/kasky_nike_justfacts/

http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1998-04-21/business/9804210336_1_nike-officials-joe-camel-workers

Cases that I have found that have ended up in court include thefollowing:June 6th 2000Nicknamed the David vs Goliath case, an Australian union called TheTextile Clothing and Footwear Union of Australia (which is a smallunion representing vulnerable Australian workers) took Nike to courtover the way it treats it's employees.  This was the first time thatNike had been called to account for its labour practices in a Courtanywhere in the world.Nike admitted defeat and settled with the Australian clothing union.You can read more about this court case at:http://www.cleanclothes.org/legal/00-06-06-nike.htmNike has also been sued for allegedly lying about conditions in asianfactories:"The suit, filed in San Francisco superior court April 20, accusedNike of violating California's consumer laws by willfully misleadingthe public about working conditions for the hundreds of thousands ofVietnamese, Chinese and Indonesian laborers who produce the footwearwith its distinctive "Swoosh" logo."We feel that Nike has one of the worst track records," said PatrickCoughlin, one of the lawyers on the suit. "The conditions are justhorrendous."The suit alleges that, contrary to statements by Nike, Asian"sweatshop" workers are regularly subject to physical punishment andsexual abuse.It says Nike factory workers are often exposed to dangerous chemicals,forced to work overtime, sometimes without pay, and often unable toearn a "living wage" despite workdays that can be 14 hours long."Nike has failed to tell Californians the truth about their businesspractices," said Alan Caplan, another lawyer in the group. "They areusing deception for profit."http://www.monitor.net/monitor/9804b/nikesuit.htmlNike rejected the charges, and argued that the case should not proceedbecause all of the statements cited in the lawsuit were protected asfree speech but on May 2nd 2002 the Californian Supreme Court ruledthat Nike could be sued after all."In a split decision, California's top court found that Nike's effortsto defend its Asian business practices were in essence commercial, andthus not subject to the free speech protections guaranteed by the U.S.Constitution."http://www.cleanclothes.org/companies/nike02-05-02.htmNike's response to this lawsuit can be found at:http://www.nike.com/nikebiz/news/pressrelease.jhtml?year=1998&month=04&letter=dNike have also been accused of violating Japan's antitrust laws:"Japan's Federal Trade Commission raided Nike's Japanese offices lastweek as part of an investigation into local retailers' claims thatNike is violating antitrust law. Japanese retailers say sales of Nikeshoes have slumped, and they claim the company has tried to preventthem from lowering prices by threatening to stop supplying the shoes.It is a violation of Japanese antitrust law to tell retailers how muchto charge."http://www.wweek.com/html/scoreboard120397.htmlBy far, the best site I found on Nike's treatment of it's employee'sis on the BBC's website.  A factual programme called Panorama wasscreened on October 15 2000, it investigated the conditions in bothNike's and GAP's factories in Cambodia.  The reporter shows how bothNike and GAP are breaking their own code of conduct and are stillemploying children.  The site includes a 19 minute webcast with thereporter of the programme and a complete transcript of the show.http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/audiovideo/programmes/panorama/newsid_970000/970385.stmNike reacted to the show by terminating it's contract with thetextiles factory and claiming that it had no knowledge of childrenworking there."Nike UK's head of corporate communication, Yvonne Iwaniuk, said: "Weare painfully aware of the situation at the June factory in Cambodiaand upon reviewing the situation we have decided to pull out of thefactory."We deeply regret what has happened there and are doing everything toaddress the issues that allowed this to happen.""http://www.nikeworkers.org/october_00/child_labor_drop.htmlOther links which you may find helpful:CorpWatch article, Court Says Nike Must Defend Its PR:http://www.corpwatch.org/news/PND.jsp?articleid=2571 Clean Clothes Campaign, The complete overview of the Nike case:http://www.cleanclothes.org/companies/nikecase.htmNikeworkers.org, includes articles about Nike and it's employees:http://www.cleanclothes.org/companies/nikecase.htmCommunity Aid Abroad - the NikeWatch Campaign:http://www.caa.org.au/campaigns/nike/Give it up man you have no idea what you are talking about.

 

[genotatted]

this dude timmy just needs to get it up like seriously. you have no idea of what your talking about. you are steady trying to push your opinions on people when obviously gm does not mean fake. 

unauthorized, unauthorised  (anˈoːθəraizd) adjective

not having the permission of the people in authority

fake[sup]1[/sup]  (feɪk) 

v. faked, fak•ing,  
n., adj. v.t.
1. to create or render so as to mislead, deceive, or defraud others

 

[kungfu koala]

I honestly wouldn't touch these.

 

[jlibron11]

there legit

 

[knights23]

Timmy read the Grey Market thread plenty of pics. Plus everyone that owns a pair says that the materials are the EXACT same. There is your proof!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I am still waiting for you to prove to me they are not the same materials............................

 

[timmybrixxx]

IM NOT YOUR DUDE

You have no idea what you are talking about!  Weaved plastic hahahahahahahaha do you mean woven its not womans hair? Please prove to me it is "weaved Plastic" it looks nothing like plastic nothing at all.  just give up you do not know the XIs plain and simple. I can tell the people its the same because it is the same. and yes it has been proven to be. the Air units you mention are on a video shot in 2008 long before GM were ever mentioned.

YOU CAN NOT POINT OUT THE DIFFERENCE YOU GO BY THE COLOR OF THE SOLES THATS IT !!!!!!! THATS ALL YOU DO. YOU THEN MAKE UP CRAP ABOUT THE REST OF THE SHOE NOT BEING PERFECT!!!!!!!!

man the color of the soles dont even matter...I can tell they fake by more than that or we wouldnt be arguing about this ish..whatev believe what you want..

 

[timmybrixxx]

Omg Timm just shut the f*** up already these are legit gm pairs depends on the price I would cop,And to you timmy you probably have social problems that you spend all ranting about something on a forum everyone is against you common sense is your not the one who's right,Go to a doctor before you start causing problems in the streets

LOL..yada yada yada.. go rock your GMs bro.. every 15 yr old that got some FAKE jams for 200$ is against me! OH NOOOOOOOOO... lol you guys crack me up..

 

[genotatted]

Here we go again gm does not mean fake geez!

 

[timmybrixxx]

Timmy read the Grey Market thread plenty of pics. Plus everyone that owns a pair says that the materials are the EXACT same. There is your proof!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I am still waiting for you to prove to me they are not the same materials............................

of course they do.

this dude timmy just needs to get it up like seriously. you have no idea of what your talking about. you are steady trying to push your opinions on people when obviously gm does not mean fake. 

unauthorized, unauthorised  (anˈoːθəraizd) adjective

not having the permission of the people in authority

fake[sup]1[/sup]  (feɪk) 

v. faked, fak•ing,  
n., adj. v.t.
1. to create or render so as to mislead, deceive, or defraud others

come on man.. dont you think thats why "they" chose the term GM?? Do you know anything about spin or marketing? mentally challenged sounds better than ******ed.. GM sounds better than replica or fake..IDc what you guys think.. wait a few yrs you will see when your GMs are fallin apart at the seams.. you guys are straight sheep..

 

[nick3232]

looking at your posts your calling gm/fake on everything cause of stupid inperfections you even call legit rd pairs fake omg just leave the forums

 

[missmymoney]

everything on the shoes is the same but these were most likely made after the initial release. the soles are wayy too blue.

my ndc pair was never that blue

This.

Besides sneakers ... if someone stole a bunch of Gucci fabric and had sewn a shirt from it I personally would not buy it either. It's a lot of money to drop with no return policy for defective merchandise or some kind of QC standard. that's just me. I would buy a pizza from different shops made with the same ingredients but not clothes. Again just me. Some people are happy with GM and that's fine. I just can't see paying the same high price for it as an authorized Nike pair.

 

[timmybrixxx]

.

 

[timmybrixxx]

looking at your posts your calling gm/fake on everything cause of stupid inperfections you even call legit rd pairs fake omg just leave the forums

go away man... what are you 3 fools step brothers or something?