- Sep 16, 2003
- 31,468
- 1,916
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally Posted by eaalto
Well, in Asia it's a cultural thing.
If you were rich, you didn't have to work outside in the fields, and you had lighter skin.
If you were a peasant worker, you worked outside in the sun and were much tanner.
That has trickled down to today, and that's why you still see old asian women wearing those ridiculous visors that cover their entire faces.
its not the actual product that's racist. its the idea behind wanting to be lighter skinned that has racist undertones to it.Originally Posted by minnetrapolis
well are tanning lotions racist then? OHHH!
I completely agree with this. I'm not sure about other people, but I for one find lighter skinned black women more attractive than darkerskinned black women. That's not to say that there aren't exceptions to the rule, but I cannot recall the last time I saw I dark skinned black womanthat I truly found attractive.Originally Posted by EB14
its not the actual product that's racist. its the idea behind wanting to be lighter skinned that has racist undertones to it.Originally Posted by minnetrapolis
well are tanning lotions racist then? OHHH!
for me they are basically saying that darker skin=ugly. lighter skin=attractive.