delete

[JAYxSF415]

-

 

[doctorshoes]

Take John Wall and say goodbye to Curry

 

[hugo boss dc]

youre building around stephen curry? ......................................................................................................................................................... lmao

 

[chr1scross]

Was just thinking about this earlier in my head...

Draft Wall, move Curry/Ellis..whoever else it takes to move Curry/Ellis not named Anthony...................(Randolph)

Its a risk worth taking for this damn franchise...

Can't really think much of it til the Ws luck into getting the #1 selection........

 

[sohi 23]

what are you gunna do with Monta?

 

[streethoopkilla]

Wall right now>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Curry right now

You can always teach someone how to shoot. i dont see curry getting better in terms of shooting the ball
Walls drive game is better than curry and can develop somewaht of a jumpshot

 

[big j 33]

What about Monta?

If you get the number 1 pick, you start shopping Curry/Monta.

If Wall follows in the foot steps of Rose/Evans, I'd build around him in a heartbeat.

 

[acidicality]

I'd shop Monta and try to get a good big man in return.

 

[outkast9984]

why would you get rid of curry? get rid of monta and that bad contract......and too many people are on walls jock

 

[TheGodFresco]

Draft wall, trade him for Evan Turner

 

[airjordan jb23]

Keep Wall, let go of Curry. I'd rather build around Wall than Curry if I was in that position.

 

[nublee]

Send Curry over to our Knicks

 

[franchise 55]

Trade Monta.

 

[daprescription]

If ownership stays the same, I hope the Warriors end up with the 6th pick

.

 

[jpzx]

at building around Curry. One good run makes people think he's worthy to be the base of a franchise.

You take John Wall and figure out the rest later. I can't believe this is even a question.

 

[chr1scross]

Originally Posted by nublee

Send Curry over to our Knicks

Once we land #1 pick...

Curry/Monta Sign/Trade for David Lee..........

 

[kiddin like jason]

You trade for O.J. Mayo.

Oh, wait...

 

[persiafly]

Not really sure what people see in Curry that would even make them consider keeping him over Wall in this situation. At best it seems that he would become a Reggie Miller type, but Wall looks like he could become more than that. I would much rather have a 6'4 PG than a 6'3 SG if both are equally good at their positions.

You can't keep both because you need some height on the defensive end in your backcourt, so you shop Curry and keep Wall. Same applies to Monta.

 

[daprescription]

Originally Posted by PersiaFly

Not really sure what people see in Curry that would even make them consider keeping him over Wall in this situation. At best it seems that he would become a Reggie Miller type, but Wall looks like he could become more than that. I would much rather have a 6'4 PG than a 6'3 SG if both are equally good at their positions.

You can't keep both because you need some height on the defensive end in your backcourt, so you shop Curry and keep Wall. Same applies to Monta.

I agree, I would trade both Monta and Curry.
However, I still don't understand why people continue to call Curry a SG.  Not to be a +!%#, but if you do not watch the games, then don't act like you know what you are talking about people.  Curry has shown that he is very capable of running a team.  He is not going to be a shooting guard on any team.

 

[xblker47]

Originally Posted by nublee

Send Curry over to our Knicks

  

 

[kix4kix]

wall=flop

 

[persiafly]

Originally Posted by daprescription

Originally Posted by PersiaFly

Not really sure what people see in Curry that would even make them consider keeping him over Wall in this situation. At best it seems that he would become a Reggie Miller type, but Wall looks like he could become more than that. I would much rather have a 6'4 PG than a 6'3 SG if both are equally good at their positions.

You can't keep both because you need some height on the defensive end in your backcourt, so you shop Curry and keep Wall. Same applies to Monta.

I agree, I would trade both Monta and Curry.
However, I still don't understand why people continue to call Curry a SG.  Not to be a +!%#, but if you do not watch the games, then don't act like you know what you are talking about people.  Curry has shown that he is very capable of running a team.  He is not going to be a shooting guard on any team.

You got me on that, I haven't watched him play. But I have always considered shoot-first PGs to basically be SGs. AI, Gilbert, whoever. They can bring the ball up, but if their main outlook is to shoot rather than get shots for others, they're PGs to me. Not saying that describes Curry, I just assumed it did looking at some of his statlines and watching him at Davidson. If he is a PG though, then your decision is even easier, cuz he's not on the level of Wall. 

 

[rook]

You def. Shop that pick and do what Boston did a couple years back

 

[andrew630]

Originally Posted by GSDOUBLEU

Draft wall, trade him for Evan Turner

That's what I was thinking, but Evan Turner is pretty old for a rookie.

Draft Wall, trade for Cousins. Move Biedrins and Monta.

 

[franchise 55]

Originally Posted by PersiaFly

Originally Posted by daprescription

Originally Posted by PersiaFly

Not really sure what people see in Curry that would even make them consider keeping him over Wall in this situation. At best it seems that he would become a Reggie Miller type, but Wall looks like he could become more than that. I would much rather have a 6'4 PG than a 6'3 SG if both are equally good at their positions.

You can't keep both because you need some height on the defensive end in your backcourt, so you shop Curry and keep Wall. Same applies to Monta.

I agree, I would trade both Monta and Curry.
However, I still don't understand why people continue to call Curry a SG.  Not to be a +!%#, but if you do not watch the games, then don't act like you know what you are talking about people.  Curry has shown that he is very capable of running a team.  He is not going to be a shooting guard on any team.

You got me on that, I haven't watched him play. But I have always considered shoot-first PGs to basically be SGs. AI, Gilbert, whoever. They can bring the ball up, but if their main outlook is to shoot rather than get shots for others, they're PGs to me. Not saying that describes Curry, I just assumed it did looking at some of his statlines and watching him at Davidson. If he is a PG though, then your decision is even easier, cuz he's not on the level of Wall. 

Yeah, I wouldn't even call Curry a shoot first PG. If the Warriors got Wall, I'd trade Monta before Curry though.