HankMoody wrote:
Oh. Didn't know. Dior-inspired I guess...
Shouldn't have to come at an individual like that. My bad. I just get rss feeds for all the clothing threads on here, including high-end threads in sneaker showcase and a lot of the stuff is downright laughable. But it is LV or Gucci and bam! It's cool and worth 4 figures. I'm all for spending money on quality items( for example you pointed out a pair of meticulously crafted dress shoes a while back in one thread to demonstrate the relevancy of the pricing and I looked at them very closely and agreed) but some of the stuff in the high-end threads just baffles me. Using a designer to back up a point just irks me, tbh, and you bringing up Dior did just that. No hard feelings here.
No offense taken.
Jeans actually aren't Dior inspired either, more Julius or MA+.
Anyways, there is a reason I keep the higher end designer thread separate from this thread. I don't bring most of the stuff posted there in here unless it is some nice dress shoes or boots. That thread is all binge spending, no doubt about it. Like I said, luxury spending isn't something I see as reasonable. Sure a $50 Timex keeps time as well as a Rolex but we pay $5k for it (more on this topic later). I can't say I like everything that is posted in that thread but it is just to share a common interest. Kind of like my blog, it's for luxury sneakers, I post whatever I find that is new and interesting, I don't have to like it and I probably wouldn't buy it even on deep discount but I post it because it is there to show whats out there. In the high-end thread, if something looks bad, I state my opinion and move on and people tell me the same thing when they do not like what I got. It's been pretty civil in that thread for the most part.
Back to spending some big bucks on clothing/shoes (designer or not), someone in another forum actually pointed out a good question that could start a good discussion here. I'd be interested to read what some of you thinks.
A more interesting question is why do so many people feel their car is a reflection of themselves, similar to how clothing is often viewed?
With clothing the link is far more direct since people will frequently mistake a perfect fitting, well styled outfit as being one in the same as the person wearing it. The psychologist J. C. Flugel even coined the term "confluence" to describe this phenomena of mistaking one's clothing as being an actual part of the person themselves. But with a car this association is far weaker.
Yet in American society most people spend hugely disproportionate amounts of their income on new cars every few years, and relatively little on clothing. If you spend a while watching the cars come and go in a parking lot, it is not difficult to spot $40,000+ new vehicles with the people getting out of them looking like they buy all their clothing form Walmart or Costco.
To the average American a $500 pair of shoes is an unthinkable level of luxury! (Recall the big deal made a couple years ago over John McCain's $500 shoes). Yet a $40,000 car is seen as very sensible to many or perhaps even a level of luxury that one deserves, never mind that $15,000 cars exist that might suit their transportation needs too.
How did we get this point? Why the difference?