Umm anyone that says the 09s look better than those GMs posted above is either blind or delusional. The cut and quality used on the 2009 jams was the exact same as the disgraceful CDP blk/reds.
2009 Jams are straight trash just like the CDPs.
Those GMs look just like my 01s sans the "JAM" tongu label and gummier soles.
Thanks for backing up my clams. When I get my 2001 pairs back from restoration, I will do more comparisons, but I know that show because I wore it daily. Minus the jumpman jam, these are just like my 2001 pair. Thicker patent, softer midsoles and comfort is on point. I would swear this was that shoe and not the retros of late. AND I KNOW THIS BECAUSE I HAVE BEEN COLLECTING FOR 20+ YEARS AND HAVE OG'S TO COMPARE IT TO
View media item 459301View media item 459302
Patent cut on these jams compared to my of concords are on point. Sorry. It is no denying. And my thoughts are these are even better than the official release pairs. JB got a problem on there hands.