- 6,227
- 238
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2006
Definitely still has a nice butt though
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Originally Posted by Th3RealF0lkBlu3s
Lack of hips are important, but it can be forgiven with the right combination of other things. Paula is forgiven.
Originally Posted by scshift
Rashida Jones >>> everything
Pretty subjective but she got a tight little butt which is mass to me, I dunno what the cutoff for it to be labeled "mass" is-My point is she has something that could be defined as glutemus maximus and minimusOriginally Posted by UptownsDotNetStacky
Originally Posted by AntonLaVey
Originally Posted by Mangudai954
Pointed this out in the last thread of hers. I rather a chick have some shady feet than no hips.
According to that other thread some NTers would rather have a chick with a penis than no hips
Hip are overrated, she looks toned athletic, petite with the right amount of "mass", well proportioned--she's forgiven
Where do you see a mass, bro???
Originally Posted by Th3RealF0lkBlu3s
Lack of hips are important, but it can be forgiven with the right combination of other things. Paula is forgiven.
Man, there aint even no curve on the booty and she has on tights. It's ok bro cause we know you get down with the flapjack booties.Originally Posted by AntonLaVey
Pretty subjective but she got a tight little butt which is mass to me, I dunno what the cutoff for it to be labeled "mass" is-My point is she has something that could be defined as glutemus maximus and minimusOriginally Posted by UptownsDotNetStacky
Originally Posted by AntonLaVey
According to that other thread some NTers would rather have a chick with a penis than no hips
Hip are overrated, she looks toned athletic, petite with the right amount of "mass", well proportioned--she's forgiven
Where do you see a mass, bro???
Originally Posted by cguy610
Man, there aint even no curve on the booty and she has on tights. It's ok bro cause we know you get down with the flapjack booties.Originally Posted by AntonLaVey
Pretty subjective but she got a tight little butt which is mass to me, I dunno what the cutoff for it to be labeled "mass" is-My point is she has something that could be defined as glutemus maximus and minimusOriginally Posted by UptownsDotNetStacky
Where do you see a mass, bro???
Originally Posted by WhatsLosinLike
Dont give a %@!+. Still flawless.
Originally Posted by Dagrandesoda
she still look sexier than a mug.
and her voice sexy too. (puts on can you handle it by usher)
Yall Nt's want yall women to be perfect, but yallselves is fat or ulgy? Unfair standards?
Originally Posted by UptownsDotNetStacky
That's why she has such a "crossover" appeal...she is bad as hell in the face, too
Originally Posted by DCAllAmerican
She looks good. Still, she has zero butt.
Originally Posted by Maximus Meridius
I didn't know her mass was that flat. She still sexy though, she gets a pass.
Th3RealF0lkBlu3s wrote:
Lack of hips are important, but it can be forgiven with the right combination of other things. Paula is forgiven.
[font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
[/font]
Originally Posted by AntonLaVey
Originally Posted by cguy610
Man, there aint even no curve on the booty and she has on tights. It's ok bro cause we know you get down with the flapjack booties.Originally Posted by AntonLaVey
Pretty subjective but she got a tight little butt which is mass to me, I dunno what the cutoff for it to be labeled "mass" is-My point is she has something that could be defined as glutemus maximus and minimus
or nice toned, cute ones instead of superfluous, cellulite filled masses of flab-However you wanna put it