- Oct 12, 2010
- 38
- 10
Finishline has both the Hyperdunk 2010 and the Hyperfuse for $99.99 right now. I'm looking for input from anyone who has played in both. I don't care about the casual aspect, purely court performance.
- Oct 12, 2010
- 38
- 10
Finishline has both the Hyperdunk 2010 and the Hyperfuse for $99.99 right now. I'm looking for input from anyone who has played in both. I don't care about the casual aspect, purely court performance.
- Jul 22, 2004
- 4,991
- 454
hyperfuse have always been $99. I own a pair and think they are great. Got them a half size bigger because they felt narrow when I put them on, but I should've gone with my true size
- Jul 22, 2004
- 4,991
- 454
hyperfuse have always been $99. I own a pair and think they are great. Got them a half size bigger because they felt narrow when I put them on, but I should've gone with my true size
- Dec 9, 2006
- 8,920
- 509
Sneaker Review thread is a better place to ask.
- Dec 9, 2006
- 8,920
- 509
Sneaker Review thread is a better place to ask.
SLP
formerly slp product
- Feb 8, 2005
- 7,458
- 2,562
Hyperfuse's are good money.
niketowns had the four original colors marked down to 59.99 some weeks back.
niketowns had the four original colors marked down to 59.99 some weeks back.
SLP
formerly slp product
- Feb 8, 2005
- 7,458
- 2,562
Hyperfuse's are good money.
niketowns had the four original colors marked down to 59.99 some weeks back.
niketowns had the four original colors marked down to 59.99 some weeks back.
- Feb 22, 2005
- 213
- 10
Hyperfuse>Hyperdunk
but it all depends on the position and the way you play. since i'm a guard, i love the flexibility and comfort that the Hyperfuse offers. the Hyperdunk2010 is way too stiff for me and not that comfortable, imo.
but it all depends on the position and the way you play. since i'm a guard, i love the flexibility and comfort that the Hyperfuse offers. the Hyperdunk2010 is way too stiff for me and not that comfortable, imo.
- Feb 22, 2005
- 213
- 10
Hyperfuse>Hyperdunk
but it all depends on the position and the way you play. since i'm a guard, i love the flexibility and comfort that the Hyperfuse offers. the Hyperdunk2010 is way too stiff for me and not that comfortable, imo.
but it all depends on the position and the way you play. since i'm a guard, i love the flexibility and comfort that the Hyperfuse offers. the Hyperdunk2010 is way too stiff for me and not that comfortable, imo.
mr niketalk sr
Banned
- Mar 31, 2010
- 607
- 10
the hyperdunk is amazing once you break them in, stiff at first but amazing once ur in them for a week. i hated how high and odd the sole was, it also felt to clunky for me imo.
hyperdunk is underrated preformance monster of the year
hyperdunk is underrated preformance monster of the year
mr niketalk sr
Banned
- Mar 31, 2010
- 607
- 10
the hyperdunk is amazing once you break them in, stiff at first but amazing once ur in them for a week. i hated how high and odd the sole was, it also felt to clunky for me imo.
hyperdunk is underrated preformance monster of the year
hyperdunk is underrated preformance monster of the year
solewoman
Staff member
- Jul 27, 2006
- 19,814
- 22,215
i want the 09 or 08 versions. the originals but cant find them. the 10 models are cut too high for me.
solewoman
Staff member
- Jul 27, 2006
- 19,814
- 22,215
i want the 09 or 08 versions. the originals but cant find them. the 10 models are cut too high for me.
- Jun 11, 2007
- 1,312
- 10
the hyperdunks @$@@ on the hyperfuse.
the hyperfuse has a terrible fit, nike over compensated for the mesh upper by squeezing the life out of your foot. it also has only forefoot zoom, no shank plate, and a bad heel-to-toe transition.
the hyperdunk has a good transition, shank plate, heel and forefoot zoom, and is lighter. once you break in the upper this isn't even a fair comparison.
the hyperfuse has a terrible fit, nike over compensated for the mesh upper by squeezing the life out of your foot. it also has only forefoot zoom, no shank plate, and a bad heel-to-toe transition.
the hyperdunk has a good transition, shank plate, heel and forefoot zoom, and is lighter. once you break in the upper this isn't even a fair comparison.
- Jun 11, 2007
- 1,312
- 10
the hyperdunks @$@@ on the hyperfuse.
the hyperfuse has a terrible fit, nike over compensated for the mesh upper by squeezing the life out of your foot. it also has only forefoot zoom, no shank plate, and a bad heel-to-toe transition.
the hyperdunk has a good transition, shank plate, heel and forefoot zoom, and is lighter. once you break in the upper this isn't even a fair comparison.
the hyperfuse has a terrible fit, nike over compensated for the mesh upper by squeezing the life out of your foot. it also has only forefoot zoom, no shank plate, and a bad heel-to-toe transition.
the hyperdunk has a good transition, shank plate, heel and forefoot zoom, and is lighter. once you break in the upper this isn't even a fair comparison.
davis
formerly koopa2410
- Nov 1, 2007
- 5,408
- 145
hyperdunk 2010 >>>> hyperfuse. not even close. especially if you have normal people feet.
davis
formerly koopa2410
- Nov 1, 2007
- 5,408
- 145
hyperdunk 2010 >>>> hyperfuse. not even close. especially if you have normal people feet.
- Apr 10, 2005
- 1,591
- 10
after 3 in-game wears of the Hyperdunk 2010, I found them unrelentlessly stiff around the ankle, higher cut than I imagined, and a bit too loose and flimsy in the forefoot. However, I may have narrower feet than other people on here (the AJ XII retro is my favorite balling shoe of all time due to the way it fits my foot perfectly), so who knows. Traction was very good, though...
In contrast, the Hyperfuse is my favorite shoe to play in other than the XII retro or Kobe 4, and has far superior breathability. I don't really notice the lack in heel cushioning that some complain about, but the Cushlon in the midsole more than compensates for no heel Zoom or Air for me. Plus, the tighter fit makes my foot feel very secure. Traction is just as good as the HD 2010.
I am a 6'2" 175lbs wing, and rank the Hyperfuse ahead of most other recent Nike shoes for bball including the Hyperdunk 2010, OG Hyperdunk, Kobe V, and AJ 2010 Team. In fact, they are the only shoes I currently enjoy playing in more are the XII retro and maybe the Kobe 4.
for me, Hyperfuse >>> Hyperdunk. And it isn't even close.
In contrast, the Hyperfuse is my favorite shoe to play in other than the XII retro or Kobe 4, and has far superior breathability. I don't really notice the lack in heel cushioning that some complain about, but the Cushlon in the midsole more than compensates for no heel Zoom or Air for me. Plus, the tighter fit makes my foot feel very secure. Traction is just as good as the HD 2010.
I am a 6'2" 175lbs wing, and rank the Hyperfuse ahead of most other recent Nike shoes for bball including the Hyperdunk 2010, OG Hyperdunk, Kobe V, and AJ 2010 Team. In fact, they are the only shoes I currently enjoy playing in more are the XII retro and maybe the Kobe 4.
for me, Hyperfuse >>> Hyperdunk. And it isn't even close.
- Apr 10, 2005
- 1,591
- 10
after 3 in-game wears of the Hyperdunk 2010, I found them unrelentlessly stiff around the ankle, higher cut than I imagined, and a bit too loose and flimsy in the forefoot. However, I may have narrower feet than other people on here (the AJ XII retro is my favorite balling shoe of all time due to the way it fits my foot perfectly), so who knows. Traction was very good, though...
In contrast, the Hyperfuse is my favorite shoe to play in other than the XII retro or Kobe 4, and has far superior breathability. I don't really notice the lack in heel cushioning that some complain about, but the Cushlon in the midsole more than compensates for no heel Zoom or Air for me. Plus, the tighter fit makes my foot feel very secure. Traction is just as good as the HD 2010.
I am a 6'2" 175lbs wing, and rank the Hyperfuse ahead of most other recent Nike shoes for bball including the Hyperdunk 2010, OG Hyperdunk, Kobe V, and AJ 2010 Team. In fact, they are the only shoes I currently enjoy playing in more are the XII retro and maybe the Kobe 4.
for me, Hyperfuse >>> Hyperdunk. And it isn't even close.
In contrast, the Hyperfuse is my favorite shoe to play in other than the XII retro or Kobe 4, and has far superior breathability. I don't really notice the lack in heel cushioning that some complain about, but the Cushlon in the midsole more than compensates for no heel Zoom or Air for me. Plus, the tighter fit makes my foot feel very secure. Traction is just as good as the HD 2010.
I am a 6'2" 175lbs wing, and rank the Hyperfuse ahead of most other recent Nike shoes for bball including the Hyperdunk 2010, OG Hyperdunk, Kobe V, and AJ 2010 Team. In fact, they are the only shoes I currently enjoy playing in more are the XII retro and maybe the Kobe 4.
for me, Hyperfuse >>> Hyperdunk. And it isn't even close.
- May 2, 2004
- 1,951
- 30
I have both and I prefer the HD2010s. The fuses are so narrow and the vamp is soo shallow on the shoes even after you break them in (I went a 1/2sz up). The HD's remind me of the 2K4's which are goat imo. The upper though seems almost too flexible and could be a problem for stability i.e. turning your ankle..
- May 2, 2004
- 1,951
- 30
I have both and I prefer the HD2010s. The fuses are so narrow and the vamp is soo shallow on the shoes even after you break them in (I went a 1/2sz up). The HD's remind me of the 2K4's which are goat imo. The upper though seems almost too flexible and could be a problem for stability i.e. turning your ankle..
GQK44
formerly kashjunior
- Oct 10, 2010
- 843
- 280
With all these great shoes coming out it always makes me wonder what these shoes would be like if nike stopped cutting corners and used better materials
GQK44
formerly kashjunior
- Oct 10, 2010
- 843
- 280
With all these great shoes coming out it always makes me wonder what these shoes would be like if nike stopped cutting corners and used better materials
Similar threads
