- Jun 14, 2013
- 2,998
- 5,383
Jordan 1 SBB
- Thread in 'Price/Fake Checks' Thread starter Started by dachosen1,
- Start date
- Jun 14, 2013
- 2,998
- 5,383
- Oct 24, 2010
- 95,272
- 34,511
take some pictures of the shoes in natural light without the flash especially toe box
first glance they kinda look good but something looks off/weird especially toe box so need a better pic. could be a very good fake but can't say for certain
first glance they kinda look good but something looks off/weird especially toe box so need a better pic. could be a very good fake but can't say for certain
- Oct 24, 2010
- 95,272
- 34,511
yea just as I figured toe box material is really off
as well as the side panel.
these are some really good fakes
as well as the side panel.
these are some really good fakes
- Oct 6, 2016
- 11,294
- 27,090
The leather doesn't look good at all. But could it be a poor quality pair that made it through QC? Other than the terrible cracked/tumbled toes, I think they are legit. I have a pair of tens with a side panel that matches that look. I know diff shoe diff year, but just a thought. Jordan 1s leather inconsistencies are well known. Shape looks correct.
- Oct 24, 2010
- 95,272
- 34,511
I thought that was well, shape looks pretty good. Black leather looks good.
I do see a widows peak on the heel of the left shoe. that included with the toe leather is putting me off.
- Jun 14, 2013
- 2,998
- 5,383
That widows peak and sloppy holes placement on the toe box is definitely what throws me off too. Also, the lace bag seems longer compared to my other 1s. Not 100% sure if that’s significant.
Attachments
- Oct 24, 2010
- 95,272
- 34,511
I’m going with fake. Haven’t seen a SBB toebox with leather like that. It’s supposed to be very soft and very thunbled and almost a matte type leather
Similar threads
