- 411
- 1,901
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2023
Obvs the midsole not properly attached yet but toe shape could be good off of those images.
Dunno how I feel about them tbh.
Dunno how I feel about them tbh.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I like em tho. And they'll do the job until they eventually retro them again with the correct shape.
Seems like a lot of people are critical of the 2019 release. I missed out on those. What was so bad about them? Did you skip out on them? And if not, did you keep your pair or did you eventually sell them?
2019 IV are uncomfortable even for Jordan 4 retro standardsSeems like a lot of people are critical of the 2019 release. I missed out on those. What was so bad about them? Did you skip out on them? And if not, did you keep your pair or did you eventually sell them?
These look like someone in the factory covered their hands in baby oil before hastily gluing together a size 7 so his homeboy could take a pic.wtf???? Thoughts??
![]()
Wear them outside a bit and they should dull naturally.There’s a way you can dull this leather. They really trolling hard fixing the shape then changing the material
All in
at the minimum it's a good rotation sneaker option
I have em, and they're fine to me. Biggest complaints are as followed:
1. Shape /Overall Height
2. No white edges on the durabuck
3. Nike Air isn't perfectly centered
I like em tho. And they'll do the job until they eventually retro them again with the correct shape.
I love and cherish mine. Hyper critical? Nike Air is off centre, toe shape is a little boxy, material cut-lines and overlays are completely black as opposed to white/grey.
For what it is, it's great. But it isn't the OG (never will be either IMO - even the SB4 shape and revisions do not replicate the OG).
I honestly don’t understand how you guys can spend your money on the 2019 when we got a near perfect retro in 99 and some people even think it was a superior version to the 89. The 99 proves JB are capable of a near exact retro of the 89. If you’re not super into the details I can get that but to have the complaints you have and still spend the money on them baffles me. I mean, not everyone knows about the 99 although I’m mentioning it and so do a lot other people. But its hard to make excuses for JB about not making a near exact retro when you can see the AM90 & AM1 86 Big bubble as examples where Nike can get it right near perfectly And somehow its ok to make excuses for JB not doing so with J’s.
Knowing the details and having complaints and STILL buying gives the brand ZERO incentive to get it right. Thats why it’s taken nearly 20 years to get the shape on the 4 right at this point and there’s still details they can improve upon like for example, the netting.
And we still have to wait and see what these reimagined 4’s look like. Thats gonna be huge for a lot of people and their anticipation for the militaries, myself included because the shape on these is what we will most likely get on those