Jordan Retro 11 (2000 OR 2011)??

[Hallorrann]

thats not even a question
2000 hands down

 

[jordanhigh23]

He copped at Doumitt's shoes lol...cats now a days wouldn't know what the h%ll that is now...those dudes were always shady working there, never have your size and what not.

 

[eltouha]

Originally Posted by freelythinkingmind

Og's are sexy

indeed, however that doesn't look to be an option for the op.

 

[polorsport]

I listed my 2000 AJ 11's to pay for new pairs of 2011 to wear. But, I can't seem to get 1 pair of size 12's for a reasonable price. 

 

[drew]

I'd keep the 2000s IMO.



-Drew

 

[heyiplaybball]

2000 no questions about it. I rather have the 00' yellow pair then the icy sole of 11'

 

[emil23j]

You keep the 2000s for sure. Im kind of dissapointed at the 2011s but that is just me.

 

[mazzo1]

Originally Posted by cguy610

Keep both and get rid of something else. That allows you to stop acting scared and wear your XIs

THIS

 

[younggza]

Originally Posted by emil23j

You keep the 2000s for sure. Im kind of dissapointed at the 2011s but that is just me.

I am with ya on this one brotha, tryin to find another pair preferably in a 9.5 DS......that would be my Christmas Joy!

 

[philchen89]

there's gotta be another pair that you would rather get rid of.. if money is the issue. or maybe another item all together

 

[cashm0neyand1]

2000s are much better. you wont see different variations of patent leather cuts on the 2000s. i have 4 pairs of 2000s, and they all the same exact high patent leather cut. awesome shoes.

 

[steveo870]

Originally Posted by Chavii06

I wish i had the same Concord problem as you

 

[ccastro02]

This question had dawned upon me aswell. I had two pairs of 00's. I sold my neear deadstock pair in the summer, but kept my deadstock pair. After all this madness with the concords that just released, i wish i could've used the pair i sold for leverage for a trade with a pair of 2011 concords. However, i would never in a million years trade my DS 00's for a pair of 2011's.

 

[dontae]

haahaha yep keeping my 2000's DS and about to put in work in the 2011s!

 

[websternguyen]

OGs are way better. Keep yours.

 

[beh235]

OP, I have one near deadstock and a 2011 deadstock as well. You know what? Keep them. Why would you get rid of one? They're yours. The only reason why I have my 2000 pair VNDS is because I knew this release would go exactly like it did, which meant it would be hard for me to get a second pair. I got my pair in last night and did a quick comparison and I also like the 2000 version better. The leather in the upper (where the jumpman is) is of better quality for both these and the 2000 spacejams. I compared both sets and the leather on the 2000 versions feel much more like a basketball shoe than the newer ones. Face it folks, these kicks are strictly for style

.

* I'm shocked at the love the '00 pair is getting over the '11 pair

. People are so much from the "what have you done lately?" train of thought. People think the '00 is yellow in comparison but that's just how they were made.

 

[mj4ever2320]

2011 all the way

 

[VercettiSpeed]

id keep both honestly, but then again i would be scared as crap to wear the 2000s, just the fact that they might crumble as i walk is somethin im not trynna deal with.

 

[dankenstien88]

Originally Posted by kingofkingz

id keep both honestly, but then again i would be scared as crap to wear the 2000s, just the fact that they might crumble as i walk is somethin im not trynna deal with.

   XIs dont crumble.

Worst case you might get some sole seperation that can be easily fixed.


2000 > 2011 all day

 

[polorsport]

For anyone interested I just added some pictures of my 2000 Concords. Link in my signature.

 

[KMante]

Sounds like a nice problem to have 

 

[junrock21]

2000 retros are def better

 

[99nikesallday]

Sounds like a good problem to have.

 

[shelovesairjordan]

2000's

 

[HEATHEN]

both, tell your fam to stop actin corny, ya'll fam, so why they hating.