- Apr 24, 2005
- 44,135
- 9,434
No disrespect, but your h*** look like E-40.
Kevin Love
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by jpzx,
- Start date
- Aug 12, 2008
- 5,455
- 11
I rather ask Joe Smith.
Since I don't feel like venturing into the Minny season thread, will you agree that this year's team is better than the teams led by Big Al? And that you guys are expecting more than 22-24 wins?
- Aug 12, 2008
- 5,455
- 11
I rather ask Joe Smith.
Since I don't feel like venturing into the Minny season thread, will you agree that this year's team is better than the teams led by Big Al? And that you guys are expecting more than 22-24 wins?
- Aug 12, 2008
- 5,455
- 11
Gasol led the Grizz to the playoffs tho. That team overachieved imo.
- Aug 12, 2008
- 5,455
- 11
Gasol led the Grizz to the playoffs tho. That team overachieved imo.
- Feb 12, 2005
- 60,780
- 32,479
Originally Posted by nicedudewithnicedreams
I rather ask Joe Smith.
Since I don't feel like venturing into the Minny season thread, will you agree that this year's team is better than the teams led by Big Al? And that you guys are expecting more than 22-24 wins?
Joe Smith
As far as Minny being better? I wouldn't say they're neccessarily better, but they have a lot more promise for the future. Big Al was a really good player, he just didn't give this organization much of a direction.
- Feb 12, 2005
- 60,780
- 32,479
Originally Posted by nicedudewithnicedreams
I rather ask Joe Smith.
Since I don't feel like venturing into the Minny season thread, will you agree that this year's team is better than the teams led by Big Al? And that you guys are expecting more than 22-24 wins?
Joe Smith
As far as Minny being better? I wouldn't say they're neccessarily better, but they have a lot more promise for the future. Big Al was a really good player, he just didn't give this organization much of a direction.
- Jun 24, 2005
- 17,400
- 3,840
People use the Timberwolves team as an excuse of why they lose so many games. They are one of the youngest teams in the league just like us. What makes their young talent so much different than ours which is supposedly low lottery level talent from what most think?
Leaders get their guys to play together. It takes coaching too, but I'm not too sure on the Twolves coaching situation. I thought Rambis was decent, but I don't know...JPZ? So, either our team is a lot better than people want to give them credit for or Zach is that good? So, which one is it going to be?
Leaders get their guys to play together. It takes coaching too, but I'm not too sure on the Twolves coaching situation. I thought Rambis was decent, but I don't know...JPZ? So, either our team is a lot better than people want to give them credit for or Zach is that good? So, which one is it going to be?
- Jun 24, 2005
- 17,400
- 3,840
People use the Timberwolves team as an excuse of why they lose so many games. They are one of the youngest teams in the league just like us. What makes their young talent so much different than ours which is supposedly low lottery level talent from what most think?
Leaders get their guys to play together. It takes coaching too, but I'm not too sure on the Twolves coaching situation. I thought Rambis was decent, but I don't know...JPZ? So, either our team is a lot better than people want to give them credit for or Zach is that good? So, which one is it going to be?
Leaders get their guys to play together. It takes coaching too, but I'm not too sure on the Twolves coaching situation. I thought Rambis was decent, but I don't know...JPZ? So, either our team is a lot better than people want to give them credit for or Zach is that good? So, which one is it going to be?
- Mar 11, 2003
- 6,838
- 2,954
Zach Randolph.
- Mar 11, 2003
- 6,838
- 2,954
Zach Randolph.
do be doo
Banned
- Mar 13, 2009
- 6,589
- 547
JPZx pulling a Kevin Love. Not showing up in a loss.
do be doo
Banned
- Mar 13, 2009
- 6,589
- 547
JPZx pulling a Kevin Love. Not showing up in a loss.
- Feb 12, 2005
- 60,780
- 32,479
Originally Posted by bhzmafia14
People use the Timberwolves team as an excuse of why they lose so many games. They are one of the youngest teams in the league just like us. What makes their young talent so much different than ours which is supposedly low lottery level talent from what most think?
Leaders get their guys to play together. It takes coaching too, but I'm not too sure on the Twolves coaching situation. I thought Rambis was decent, but I don't know...JPZ? So, either our team is a lot better than people want to give them credit for or Zach is that good? So, which one is it going to be?
The Grizzlies aren't nearly as raw as Minnesota. The Wolves are still a franchise player away from the potential direction of this team being identified and tying this team together, whereas the Grizzlies have the pieces in place, but are still growing together as a team.
Memphis at this point is better. I wouldn't at all say it's because Randolph is that good. They have players who each have a specific role and that fit certain categories within which a team is built. Wolves don't have that identity. To answer your question, I'd choose that Memphis is better than given credit for, because given the two, it's definitely not because Randolph makes his team better.
- Feb 12, 2005
- 60,780
- 32,479
Originally Posted by bhzmafia14
People use the Timberwolves team as an excuse of why they lose so many games. They are one of the youngest teams in the league just like us. What makes their young talent so much different than ours which is supposedly low lottery level talent from what most think?
Leaders get their guys to play together. It takes coaching too, but I'm not too sure on the Twolves coaching situation. I thought Rambis was decent, but I don't know...JPZ? So, either our team is a lot better than people want to give them credit for or Zach is that good? So, which one is it going to be?
The Grizzlies aren't nearly as raw as Minnesota. The Wolves are still a franchise player away from the potential direction of this team being identified and tying this team together, whereas the Grizzlies have the pieces in place, but are still growing together as a team.
Memphis at this point is better. I wouldn't at all say it's because Randolph is that good. They have players who each have a specific role and that fit certain categories within which a team is built. Wolves don't have that identity. To answer your question, I'd choose that Memphis is better than given credit for, because given the two, it's definitely not because Randolph makes his team better.
calibeebee
Supporter
- May 6, 2007
- 21,331
- 30,629
QFT
calibeebee
Supporter
- May 6, 2007
- 21,331
- 30,629
QFT
yoppa guevara
Banned
- Jan 30, 2011
- 955
- 10
lamarcus tho
7 games over 5 hunnid
yoppa guevara
Banned
- Jan 30, 2011
- 955
- 10
lamarcus tho
7 games over 5 hunnid
- Feb 12, 2005
- 60,780
- 32,479
It's hard to have this arument vs Aldrige when Love gets no help whatsoever. What team in the NBA has any success when they only have one starter score more than 4 points?
That's one argument, but damn Minny...That's pathetic.
That's one argument, but damn Minny...That's pathetic.
- Feb 12, 2005
- 60,780
- 32,479
It's hard to have this arument vs Aldrige when Love gets no help whatsoever. What team in the NBA has any success when they only have one starter score more than 4 points?
That's one argument, but damn Minny...That's pathetic.
That's one argument, but damn Minny...That's pathetic.
- Jun 24, 2005
- 17,400
- 3,840
Originally Posted by calibeebee
QFT
Love got his double-double though.
- Jun 24, 2005
- 17,400
- 3,840
Originally Posted by calibeebee
QFT
Love got his double-double though.
- Feb 7, 2008
- 67,698
- 37,747
Originally Posted by bhzmafia14
Originally Posted by calibeebee
QFT
I was at the game.
Hope you guys had an enjoyable Valentine's Day at home though.
- Feb 7, 2008
- 67,698
- 37,747
Originally Posted by bhzmafia14
Originally Posted by calibeebee
QFT
I was at the game.
Hope you guys had an enjoyable Valentine's Day at home though.
