- 37,492
- 12,932
Save $4M in the process too.
I don’t hate it. Honestly.
Feel the Nets would want somebody going to a third team to return another pick.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Save $4M in the process too.
I don't think overpays set the market. Of those guys get moved it won't be for those pricesMurray's minimum just got set at 3 picks (if you're not trading AR).
Trae is going for 4 (if available)
Mitchell for 5 (if he enters the market)
I don't think overpays set the market. Of those guys get moved it won't be for those prices
They'll have six firsts come July 1 unless a trade is made. 2024 (tomorrow's pick), 2026,2028,2029,2030 and 2031.Sounds like some here just about every year we don't win a chip
Skylar Mays >> JHS
Not necessarily speaking to the Lakers getting them, just in general. I don't think Murray and Trae have a market like that in the first place so the bridges trade shouldn't really affect that. And as far as Mitchell I think this actually lowers the ceiling on his trade offers since the Knicks and Nets were 2 of the only teams that were reportedly interested and the Knicks were really the only that could offer so many picksMurray has multiple suitors. 2 picks seems to be the consensus before the Mikal trade (almost all mock trades had multiple picks going to Atlanta). Maybe you get him for 2, but Austin Reaves is going for him in that case. Because he's untouchable, 3 sets the market.
Trae is better than Murray and for all his warts is still viewed as someone who would be a corner stone. If Murray would have gone for 2 before Mikal trade, Trae goes for 3 and pick swaps before the Mikal trade.
Mitchell went for 3 firsts and 2 pick swaps already. My guess is his market didn't die, and has since appreciated now that he's done great things in a second location, and looked like a maniac in playoff games.
Remember Lakers have to compete against other teams to get their trades done.
Basically I don't agree with the thought process that since the Knicks overpaid for a guy they desperately want who they know will re-sign with them that now the price went up on guys that didn't really have a market to start with. It's like saying that D'lo is worth 3 firsts nowNot necessarily speaking to the Lakers getting them, just in general. I don't think Murray and Trae have a market like that in the first place so the bridges trade shouldn't really affect that. And as far as Mitchell I think this actually lowers the ceiling on his trade offers since the Knicks and Nets were 2 of the only teams that were reportedly interested and the Knicks were really the only that could offer so many picks
Basically I don't agree with the thought process that since the Knicks overpaid for a guy they desperately want who they know will re-sign with them that now the price went up on guys that didn't really have a market to start with. It's like saying that D'lo is worth 3 firsts now
If you don't get it then that means they don't have a market like that. Bridges deal was a clear overpay and not fair market value so it can't credibly be used in a negotiation. As far as I can tell it's only new Orleans potential interested in Murray/Trae and atl doesn't have any leverage. Murray isn't going for 3 picks and Trae isn't going for 4, I'd pretty much guarantee itMarkets are give and take.
If I see Player X go for 5 firsts. I want Y for my guys. Even if I don't get it. 2 teams who want them have to compete for them.
Hilarious how Pelinka was talking about how hard it is to trade these days and 24 hours later the Knicks pull this trade off
I mean, "I'll trade my diamond necklace for your cubic zirconia ring" is NEVER hard.Hilarious how Pelinka was talking about how hard it is to trade these days and 24 hours later the Knicks pull this trade off
Gabe, JHS, Max Lewis 17 for DFS?
They can have Gabe and JHS. DFS gonna fall off soon if he hasn't already.