- 4,579
- 1,734
Hearing it might be JC/Black/28/2020
**LA LAKERS THREAD** Sitting on 17! 2023-2024 offseason begins
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by licensed to ball,
- Start date
EddieDoyers
formerly eddiengambino
- 46,208
- 23,878
Magic and Rob just can't give these guys a future first,the Pacers aren't in a position to ask for more.
- 18,751
- 13,097
If we ultimately have PG, Ball (or Dlo), Porzingis and Ingram I'll be happy.
That's probably impossible though even if we trade Dlo (or #2), Randle, JC, Nance, Zu, 28
That's probably impossible though even if we trade Dlo (or #2), Randle, JC, Nance, Zu, 28
EddieDoyers
formerly eddiengambino
- 46,208
- 23,878
That would be fair also
- 25,099
- 23,864
I highly doubt Pelinka gives up the 2, Ingram, Dlo or Randle.
Guess we'll have to see.
Guess we'll have to see.
- 2,433
- 1,128
MVP
Supporter
- 83,026
- 85,610
As has been reported, #2 and Ingram are the only things off the table. Everything else is in play, even Voldermort.
- 18,751
- 13,097
I think [redacted] is on the table
- 3,234
- 1,391
Dlo can't get traded
- 42,712
- 178,473
MVP
Supporter
- 83,026
- 85,610
I'm thinking if a deal gets done it's one of these:
Clarkson/Randle, 28
Clarkson/Deng, 28, 2020
D'Lo/Deng, 28
Honestly can't be mad at any one of those.
Clarkson/Randle, 28
Clarkson/Deng, 28, 2020
D'Lo/Deng, 28
Honestly can't be mad at any one of those.
- 450
- 78
Agree on JC/Black/28 and 2020 being the ONLY deal I'd be ok with. Would be angry if D'lo, Ingram, #2 are involved. You have all the freaking leverage here. Dont do it!!!
JC im ok with bc we know who he is already. Dlo and Ingram can get better.
- 2,433
- 1,128
Taking on Deng is only worth one 1st? Dont think that's enough to take on his contract.
Why wouldn't they just do Clarkson 28 and Tarik instead?
We also have some 2nd rounders from the Calderon deal.
- 44,833
- 66,536
MVP
Supporter
- 83,026
- 85,610
Get rid of salary to be players next year in free agency.
- 44,833
- 66,536
- 2,433
- 1,128
I'm saying one future 1st isn't enough to dump him with 3 years left.
I think Pacers are going to get pennies on the dollar, but they're not gonna take on a bad contract too.
- 2,433
- 1,128
Right. No need to, they're sunk costs for this year. Would be dumb attach an asset to them at this point.
- 450
- 78
Hopefully Deng plays well first half of the season and then trade him at deadline- BEST case scenario. He sounded motivated in interviews, said he has something to prove to doubters
Last edited:
- 972
- 726
JC, Black, 28, and thats that.
Randle needs to be kept to be moved for other pieces later. I dont need PG now, get him next year. or not idgaf. im ready to roll with our young guns. If pacers dont want accept the offer then **** them. They need this now more than we do
Randle needs to be kept to be moved for other pieces later. I dont need PG now, get him next year. or not idgaf. im ready to roll with our young guns. If pacers dont want accept the offer then **** them. They need this now more than we do
EddieDoyers
formerly eddiengambino
- 46,208
- 23,878
He's getting his brick feet fixed?
- 450
- 78
Probably not but he can hit the open jumper and three (both of which he couldnt do) and provides some solid minutes at PF he should be a good vet for a team wanting leadership and a way to fill their cap.
- 450
- 78
agree
if its both JC and Randle then we LOSE big time.
The whole attractiveness of getting PG was that we didn't have to gut the team to get him. This would be opposite of that.
- 615
- 237
I'm not sure I want to give up the 2020 first rounder. I'm all for playing hardball. At the moment the main threat to getting PG is the Cavs and their front office is in shambles. Now it's possible another team swoops in, but no need to negotiate against yourself at the moment.
MVP
Supporter
- 83,026
- 85,610
How is this gutting the team? We still have Ball, D'Lo, and Ingram (our top 3 guys) plus Zu, Nance and Nwaba. Team is going to be consolidated in some fashion whether it's now or next summer. We can't keep everybody and give them all minutes.
