- Oct 22, 2012
- 22,006
- 9,942
the beginning of a 20 game win streak
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Congrats on shump
And that is his fault.
From what I've seen:
- too focused on Pau
- top of 3-pt line too much
- dribbling too long sometimes
Chill. He ain't even a PG.
No on Chandler... Just no...
I say that with all knowledge that Tyson is better than Pau.
No on Chandler... Just no...
I say that with all knowledge that Tyson is better than Pau.
tyson is overrated.
if we trade with the knicks we should give them kamaan for shump
I don't think Tyson is overrated...
I say No because we would still lack something???
A 2nd Superstar..
And since Chandler is $14mil next year as well, it would mean that we made a trade just to make one.
I don't think Tyson is overrated...
I say No because we would still lack something???
A 2nd Superstar..
And since Chandler is $14mil next year as well, it would mean that we made a trade just to make one.
Agreed 100% on chandlers injury history and contract status..
Thing is....is pau really playing like a 2nd superstar? What if it was a blockbuster including melo.....after all..chandler is what we all wanted that guy to be. Lol
i dont mind the trade, kobe shump wes hill tyson is a very solid defensive starting 5 that also is full of energy guys who love to runI don't think Tyson is overrated...tyson is overrated.No on Chandler... Just no...
I say that with all knowledge that Tyson is better than Pau.
if we trade with the knicks we should give them kamaan for shump
I say No because we would still lack something???
A 2nd Superstar..
And since Chandler is $14mil next year as well, it would mean that we made a trade just to make one.
i dont mind the trade, kobe shump wes hill tyson is a very solid defensive starting 5 that also is full of energy guys who love to run
No on Chandler... Just no...
I say that with all knowledge that Tyson is better than Pau.
tyson is overrated.
if we trade with the knicks we should give them kamaan for shump
I don't think Tyson is overrated...
I say No because we would still lack something???
A 2nd Superstar..
And since Chandler is $14mil next year as well, it would mean that we made a trade just to make one.
only problem is that replacing pau and meeks with shump and tyson in the starting lineup would put a lot more pressure on kobe to create offense
the trade would be us giving the knicks our huge expiring (pau) in exchange for a promising young player (shump) and a 2014-2015 expiring (tyson). I dont mind this because with this we will still have enough money to resign the key bench guys (with shump we no longer need to sign both young and x) and a 3 best player on a championship team level player for example deng. then after next season tyson comes off and is a valuable trade asset and we can use that cap space to sign a real franchise player.
well i really dont care about the knicks situation, im just assuming that pau for tyson/shump is the trade being discussed. I agree that it doesnt mean much to them so they are less likely to take it but if they do accept then it would be a decent trade for usThat expiring means nothing to the Knicks.... Melo & Amar'e is still over $44mil in salary..i dont mind the trade, kobe shump wes hill tyson is a very solid defensive starting 5 that also is full of energy guys who love to runNo on Chandler... Just no...
I say that with all knowledge that Tyson is better than Pau.
tyson is overrated.
if we trade with the knicks we should give them kamaan for shump
I don't think Tyson is overrated...
I say No because we would still lack something???
A 2nd Superstar..
And since Chandler is $14mil next year as well, it would mean that we made a trade just to make one.
only problem is that replacing pau and meeks with shump and tyson in the starting lineup would put a lot more pressure on kobe to create offense
the trade would be us giving the knicks our huge expiring (pau) in exchange for a promising young player (shump) and a 2014-2015 expiring (tyson). I dont mind this because with this we will still have enough money to resign the key bench guys (with shump we no longer need to sign both young and x) and a 3 best player on a championship team level player for example deng. then after next season tyson comes off and is a valuable trade asset and we can use that cap space to sign a real franchise player.
Unless the Knicks blow it up completely... I'm a no on Chandler..
I stand firm on that position...
if the trade is the same (pau for chandler/shump)Unless the Knicks blow it up completely... I'm a no on Chandler..
I stand firm on that position...