- Mar 26, 2007
- 2,885
- 12
i know its a bad pic, and there's only 1, but it looks like i can steal these for basically nothing. look legit to me, but a few more opinions never hurt.
LC: 01 spacejam 11s
- Thread in 'Archive: Jordan Brand Price/Fake Checks' Thread starter Started by damnneardeadstock,
- Start date
- Mar 26, 2007
- 2,885
- 12
i know its a bad pic, and there's only 1, but it looks like i can steal these for basically nothing. look legit to me, but a few more opinions never hurt.
- Sep 20, 2007
- 514
- 12
VERY hard to determine legitimacy from this picture.
I do not see any tell-tale signs of Fakes, but would be very cautious before purchasing.
As you well know, those pictures could be from anywhere.
If it seems too good to be true, it probably is.
I do not see any tell-tale signs of Fakes, but would be very cautious before purchasing.
As you well know, those pictures could be from anywhere.
If it seems too good to be true, it probably is.
- Sep 20, 2007
- 514
- 12
VERY hard to determine legitimacy from this picture.
I do not see any tell-tale signs of Fakes, but would be very cautious before purchasing.
As you well know, those pictures could be from anywhere.
If it seems too good to be true, it probably is.
I do not see any tell-tale signs of Fakes, but would be very cautious before purchasing.
As you well know, those pictures could be from anywhere.
If it seems too good to be true, it probably is.
- Feb 13, 2010
- 461
- 10
There's a reason he positioned it like that and awkwardly took a picture from that angle
Where's the jumpman jam on the 3rd eyelet? It looks to be on the 4th. If those were legit, the dude would have nothing to hide and take more than 1 picture in less suspicious ways.
Also, why would anyone in their right mind sell these for next to nothing? Unless he was your friend or something, but then you would just see them in person.
Where's the jumpman jam on the 3rd eyelet? It looks to be on the 4th. If those were legit, the dude would have nothing to hide and take more than 1 picture in less suspicious ways.
Also, why would anyone in their right mind sell these for next to nothing? Unless he was your friend or something, but then you would just see them in person.
- Feb 13, 2010
- 461
- 10
There's a reason he positioned it like that and awkwardly took a picture from that angle
Where's the jumpman jam on the 3rd eyelet? It looks to be on the 4th. If those were legit, the dude would have nothing to hide and take more than 1 picture in less suspicious ways.
Also, why would anyone in their right mind sell these for next to nothing? Unless he was your friend or something, but then you would just see them in person.
Where's the jumpman jam on the 3rd eyelet? It looks to be on the 4th. If those were legit, the dude would have nothing to hide and take more than 1 picture in less suspicious ways.
Also, why would anyone in their right mind sell these for next to nothing? Unless he was your friend or something, but then you would just see them in person.
- May 2, 2007
- 1,518
- 152
very iffyyy
- May 2, 2007
- 1,518
- 152
very iffyyy
- Mar 26, 2007
- 2,885
- 12
i KNOW they're sketchy, but its an ebay seller, and dude clearly has no idea what he's doing when it comes to pics. they don't have much time left and he has 2 huge spelling errors in the title, making them almost unsearchable. i usually find steals this way, but these i'm unsure about.
- Mar 26, 2007
- 2,885
- 12
i KNOW they're sketchy, but its an ebay seller, and dude clearly has no idea what he's doing when it comes to pics. they don't have much time left and he has 2 huge spelling errors in the title, making them almost unsearchable. i usually find steals this way, but these i'm unsure about.
- Nov 12, 2010
- 715
- 10
Those look kinda off, couldn't be certain without more angles.
- Nov 12, 2010
- 715
- 10
Those look kinda off, couldn't be certain without more angles.
- Feb 13, 2010
- 461
- 10
Red shows the missing 'jumpman jam'. In the first pic, the shoe is tilted more at the viewer, which means the tag should be more noticeable. Yet nothing is there.
Green shows the noticeable heel pl cut difference
The toebox looks off too
You could take a risk on these by winning the auction, but the hassle isn't worth it imo
- Feb 13, 2010
- 461
- 10
Red shows the missing 'jumpman jam'. In the first pic, the shoe is tilted more at the viewer, which means the tag should be more noticeable. Yet nothing is there.
Green shows the noticeable heel pl cut difference
The toebox looks off too
You could take a risk on these by winning the auction, but the hassle isn't worth it imo
