- 454
- 10
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2009
i believe the product/style code is for the 2010 retro release.
can i please get a legit check? thanks.
can i please get a legit check? thanks.
LC Jordan VI Retro 2010
- Thread in 'Archive: Jordan Brand Price/Fake Checks' Thread starter Started by zizou,
- Start date
- 454
- 10
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2009
i believe the product/style code is for the 2010 retro release.
can i please get a legit check? thanks.
can i please get a legit check? thanks.
- 909
- 12
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2009
Legit
-Suede is on point
-Colors are on point
-Stitching is good
Box tag is legit
-Suede is on point
-Colors are on point
-Stitching is good
Box tag is legit
- 909
- 12
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2009
Legit
-Suede is on point
-Colors are on point
-Stitching is good
Box tag is legit
-Suede is on point
-Colors are on point
-Stitching is good
Box tag is legit
- 514
- 12
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2007
Kicks are legit.
^^ @310HxA - If they are legit, everything is on point. Don't need to list them all.
^^ @310HxA - If they are legit, everything is on point. Don't need to list them all.
- 514
- 12
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2007
Kicks are legit.
^^ @310HxA - If they are legit, everything is on point. Don't need to list them all.
^^ @310HxA - If they are legit, everything is on point. Don't need to list them all.
- 2
- 10
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2010
- 2
- 10
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2010
Humbled
formerly whatslosinlike
- 15,616
- 2,161
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2010
^man those have to be some of the worst fakes ive ever seen...
-quality is HORRIBLE
-there was no jumpman on the back of a model supposedly made in 2000
-the whole shape of the shoe is off
-quality is HORRIBLE
-there was no jumpman on the back of a model supposedly made in 2000
-the whole shape of the shoe is off
Humbled
formerly whatslosinlike
- 15,616
- 2,161
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2010
^man those have to be some of the worst fakes ive ever seen...
-quality is HORRIBLE
-there was no jumpman on the back of a model supposedly made in 2000
-the whole shape of the shoe is off
-quality is HORRIBLE
-there was no jumpman on the back of a model supposedly made in 2000
-the whole shape of the shoe is off
- 59
- 10
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2011
looks legit
- 59
- 10
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2011
looks legit
- 1,519
- 152
- Joined
- May 2, 2007
What are you looking at? These are clearly 2010 (not 2000).
They're legit too.
- 1,519
- 152
- Joined
- May 2, 2007
What are you looking at? These are clearly 2010 (not 2000).
They're legit too.
Humbled
formerly whatslosinlike
- 15,616
- 2,161
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2010
the guy above my post posted some obvious fakes. he took the pictures down, hence why his post is now empty... the tag had 2000 on it with red jumpman on the back
Humbled
formerly whatslosinlike
- 15,616
- 2,161
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2010
the guy above my post posted some obvious fakes. he took the pictures down, hence why his post is now empty... the tag had 2000 on it with red jumpman on the back
