LC Royals please

[integratyper]

TIA

 

[timmybrixxx]

looks ok to me.

 

[davinci]

look legit to me

 

[integratyper]

someone told me fake

 

[huyinthecity]

everything looks fine to me except for the stitching on the back box. should have more stitching there like this. View media item 747681

 

[integratyper]

also where did you buy your pair? what is your production date on your tag.  i've heard on some threads 11/28 end date is usually a sign of a GM

 

[davinci]

everything else looked okay, but 11/28 is known to be GM and i haven't seen a legit pair YET that had that production date

i'd stay away

 

[timmybrixxx]

Actually there are VERY few legit pair with the prod dates 9/13-11/28...This does not officially mean they are fakes.. I have only seen 1 legit pair here though with those dates in months and months of doing Royal LCs..

http://niketalk.com/t/578779/aj-royal-1-legit-check-much-thanks-in-advance#post_19460277

OP post a clear pic of the soles and a clear close up of the small "R" on the box. IMO that back tab is stitched a little shotty as well..but i still think they are good.. ill be 100% with the 2 pics ive requested.

 

[davinci]

wow you just blew my mind @TIMMYBRIXXX  

it's like i just saw a unicorn 

 

[timmybrixxx]

wow you just blew my mind @TIMMYBRIXXX
 
it's like i just saw a unicorn 

I Know!.. I was really surprised myself..

 

[integratyper]

heres some more pics. any input appreciated.

 

[timmybrixxx]

still good IMO.

 

[integratyper]

I really can't find any faults that make me think its fake and i'm glad we debunked the 11/28 as being a reason for being fake. thanks timmy