LOCK.

[nothingtol0se]

havent really read up on it, but how the hell are they going to accommodate parking?

some super high tech man-made parking structure island???

that'd srsly be dope as hell.

 

[jumpmanfromdabay]

Wine sipping?

got to love the stereotypes of the people of SF. That location is going to be

 

[tee eye ehm]

I guess I'm not being clear. That was in no way a jab at the people of SF. It's moreso saying that I believe more wealthier people will be filling the seats as a social event more than real fans of the Warriors.

 

[jumpmanfromdabay]

I know it wasn't a jab

 

[dont be a menace]

slightly cheaper on the public transportation fair based on the prices today. guess i'm not as used to the trek to embarcadero then muni to the piers as some of y'all that go to giants games.

sup dland

 

[wcghost]

I'm disappointed that i'll no longer live 10 mins away from home games, but happier that i don't feel like i'm about to get jumped/robbed/assaulted every time i park in the Coliseum BART parking lot and walk over the bridge to Oracle 

Bout to smuggle some steamed crabs from Pier 39 into the new arena and get it crackin'!

 

[luong1209]

Wonder who the assets are...

[h3]Warriors Working On Trade With Jazz To Guarantee Retention Of Lottery Pick[/h3]
May 26, 2012 4:22 PM EDT

The Warriors are working on a trade with the Jazz to keep their first round pick regardless of what happens in the lottery, according to sources.

Golden State has a 72 percent change of keeping their pick as it is top-seven protected.

But the Warriors are interested in insuring that they keep the pick in case a team behind them jumps into the top-three.

The Warriors are prepared to give up a trade asset or two.

One source with knowledge of the discussions described the chances of a trade by Wednesday as "likely."

The Warriors can offer Utah a combination of future draft considerations, cash and/or a relaxation of the current restrictions on Utah's rights to the pick in question in either 2013 or 2014. At present, Golden State's 2013 pick is top-seven protected and its 2014 pick is top-six protected.

Read more: http://basketball.realgm.com/wireta...antee_Retention_Of_Lottery_Pick#ixzz1w1BDIUDp

 

[dland24]

I've never claimed to be the smartest person in the world......

but are we really talking about trading away future assets to acquire a pick that there is a 3 out of 4 chance we will already own?

 

[lavious]

Originally Posted by dland24

I've never claimed to be the smartest person in the world......

but are we really talking about trading away future assets to acquire a pick that there is a 3 out of 4 chance we will already own?

Yeah, 72.5% chance of retaining the pick, pretty dumb. The most the W's should give up is the restriction on next years pick, but why would the Jazz do that?

 

[mjdalegend]

Not sure why we need to have it on "lock". They better know what the #(&$ they're doing with it afterward. 

 

[smokey1212]

Do you guys realize what team you're talking about? You really think a 70% chance of retaining a pick is safe with this team? Every time ownership or management has missed the chance to ruin this team in the past, lady luck has quickly swooped in with a swift kick to the balls. As long as we're not giving up 1st rounders for the next 3 years, I say go ahead and secure that @*!!.

 

[jordanxi45]

Let's hope that 'asset' is GSW giving Biedrins away to Utah for free. They can take Richard Jeffersons punk #%% too.

 

[dland24]

Theres no need to stress gentlemen.  Do you really think that David Stern would allow our team to move home to SF, and play in a brand new state of the art arena without a superstar on our team?  We will win the lottery.  Bet on it. 

Plus theres this:

@AntDavis23 Oakland what's good?

 

[luong1209]

7th pick 

.

 

[Nawzlew]

Kept our pick. Satisfied.

 

[lavious]

Originally Posted by Nawzlew

Kept our pick. Satisfied.

 

[jumpmanfromdabay]

NO loses Paul and gets #1 overall pick

 

[lazyj10]

Anyone but Harrison Barnes.....please.

Now that Riles isn't the GM, I have a little bit of faith in this pick....

 

[lavious]

^ Why no Barnes? Don't think he's the best fit for this team, but he's going to be a good pro.

 

[acidicality]

Hopefully someone good slides down the board and falls to us.

 

[papageorgeo510]

We need a big body like Ibaka that can move and defend with exceptional jumper.

 

[Johnny_Cakes]

No on Sullinger?

 

[lavious]

Originally Posted by Th3RealF0lkBlu3s

No on Sullinger?

Wouldn't be the worst thing, but I'd rather the W's trade up/down then take Sullinger at 7.

 

[smokey1212]

I'd love to see Bradley Beal fall, we wouldn't take him anyways tho.

 

[bruce waynee]

Barnes is a boom or bust pick but he has star potential IMO.  If he fell to 7 the Warriors would be dumb not to take him especially given the need for a swingman.