luxury watch brand owner destroys own watches LOL

Joined
Aug 1, 2004
Messages
70,048
Reaction score
24,226
Richemont is destroying its expensive, unsold watches to save their brand value
By Marc Bain


Luxury and exclusivity fit together like two gears in a pricey Swiss watch. But any luxury product can start to lose its exclusive prestige if too many pile up in the marketplace. It can lead to price markdowns that devalue the brand and hurt its ability to sell at full cost.

Look at Swiss luxury group Richemont. Watch sales from its brands, which include Cartier, Piaget, and IWC, haven’t gone as it had hoped over the past couple years, leaving too much stock in the marketplace. Unsold, high-end watches can frequently make their way to an unauthorized “grey market” where they’re peddled at heavy discounts. The “industry’s cancer” is how Jean-Claude Biver, head of the watch division at luxury group LVMH, has described it.







To cope with the problem, Richemont has bought back €481 million (about $567 million) worth of watches from its retail partners in the last two years, it revealed in its 2018 earnings report (pdf, p. 3). The company has said in the past (paywall) that it reallocates some of these watches to other regions. The rest it takes apart and recycles. We’ve reached out to Richemont for comment and will update this story with any reply.

Though the buy-backs weighed on the company’s profits, Richemont feels the trade off is worthwhile. ”We don’t believe that having our inventory in the grey market will help long-term brand equity, so that’s why we bought it back,” Burkhart Grund, Richemont’s chief financial officer, said of the program (paywall).

The company started the buy-backs in 2016, pulling mostly unsold Cartier watches off the market in places such as Hong Kong and mainland China. The Swiss watch industry was taking a major regional hit, owing to a luxury slowdown in the country caused, in part, by a Chinese government crackdown on corruption that targeted extravagant gift-giving among government officials, including ultra-expensive watches. At the time, Richemont called the buy-backs (paywall) an “exceptional measure” in “exceptional circumstances.”

In the most recent year, though, Asia-Pacific, which makes up 40% of Richemont’s sales, saw solid growth, led by China, Hong Kong, Korea, and Macau.

Instead, this year’s buy-backs mainly focused on European markets, and centered on its specialist watchmakers division, which includes Piaget, IWC, Vacheron Constantin, and Baume & Mercier. The company said its happy with the inventory it has on the market now.

https://qz.com/1284838/why-richemont-is-destroying-unsold-cartier-and-piaget-watches/
 
A bunch of luxury brands do the samething, even non-luxury brands like h&m with thier fast fashion practices.
 
Louis Vuitton does the same thing

i reject da idea of "prestige by exclusivity" outta hand. if ur ish worth da loot it'll float or sink on its own merit.

with watches ive done crash course studyin & cramming cuz i wanna buy something next year with my car....

my consensus?

concentrate on precious metals first, horology 2nd, and brand name last.

--gold & Platinum will always hold its value, this take precedent over everything.

-a horologically solid watch is da "performance" appeal.

-brand reputation should be earned, not taken so i hold that last.
 
A perhaps surprising amount of high end brands in general do this
 
Might be a dumb question but

How do high end items make it from the place of origin to the "grey market"?

Theft?
 
Might be a dumb question but

How do high end items make it from the place of origin to the "grey market"?

Theft?

when inventory has to be move retailers will dump mass quantites of stock at a steep discount to middle men who then sell them in their channels....

da watch retail world dont have a RTV mechanism like footlocker does when kicks don't sell (which in return gets resold at a steep discount to places like TJ maxx, Marshalls, etc) so they depend on independent resellers and da grey market to liquidate stock.

 
Last edited:
i reject da idea of "prestige by exclusivity" outta hand. if ur ish worth da loot it'll float or sink on its own merit.

with watches ive done crash course studyin & cramming cuz i wanna buy something next year with my car....

my consensus?

concentrate on precious metals first, horology 2nd, and brand name last.

--gold & Platinum will always hold its value, this take precedent over everything.

-a horologically solid watch is da "performance" appeal.

-brand reputation should be earned, not taken so i hold that last.
What watch u tryna cop?
 
Not everything you see needs to be a thread...
NT was like this before 1000+ page official threads and TAN.
Constant rotation of different topics. Last a few days, half a dozen pages, on to the next one.

Always felt fresh. Now I watch like 5 threads in general (food, fools, polo, wresting, and jackets) and barely venture out of there
 
As true as that is doesn't mean every thread has value. This thread has no value and I could say the same about a great deal of these copy and paste a news article threads that get made.

Nothing to do with TAN or the official threads.
 
Some threads had value, others didnt. It all weeded itself out. A less than valuable thread didn't matter because no one would comment, it would sink a few pages, then came 3 or 4 new topics. The relevant ones stayed afloat. The subpar ones vanished. Wash rinse repeat.
 
Back
Top Bottom