Minority Report in effect

Joined
Sep 16, 2003
Messages
31,468
Reaction score
1,916
[h1]'Pre-crime' Comes to the HR Dept.[/h1]

In the Steven Spielberg movie Minority Report, police belonging to a special Pre-crime unit arrest people for crimes they would do in the future. It's science fiction, and it will probably never happen in our lifetimes.
However, the pre-crime concept is coming very soon to the world of Human Resources (HR) and employee management.

A Santa Barbara, Calif., startup called Social Intelligence data-mines the social networks to help companies decide if they really want to hire you.

While background checks, which mainly look for a criminal record, and even credit checks have become more common, Social Intelligence is the first company that I'm aware of that systematically trolls social networks for evidence of bad character.

Using automation software that slogs through Facebook, Twitter, Flickr, YouTube, LinkedIn, blogs, and "thousands of other sources," the company develops a report on the "real you" -- not the carefully crafted you in your resume. The service is called Social Intelligence Hiring. The company promises a 48-hour turn-around.

Because it's illegal to consider race, religion, age, sexual orientation and other factors, the company doesn't include that information in its reports. Humans review the reports to eliminate false positives. And the company uses only publically shared data -- it doesn't "friend" targets to get private posts, for example.

The reports feature a visual snapshot of what kind of person you are, evaluating you in categories like "Poor Judgment," "Gangs," "Drugs and Drug Lingo" and "Demonstrating Potentially Violent Behavior." The company mines for rich nuggets of raw sewage in the form of racy photos, unguarded commentary about drugs and alcohol and much more.

The company also offers a separate Social Intelligence Monitoring service to watch the personal activity of existing employees on an ongoing basis. The service is advertised as a way to enforce company social media policies, but given that criteria are company-defined, it's not clear whether it's possible to monitor personal activity.

The service provides real-time notification alerts, so presumably the moment your old college buddy tags an old photo of you naked, drunk and armed on Facebook, the boss gets a text message with a link.

Two aspects of this are worth noting. First, company spokespeople emphasize liability. What happens if one of your employees freaks out, comes to work and starts threatening coworkers with a samurai sword? You'll be held responsible because all of the signs of such behavior were clear for all to see on public Facebook pages. That's why you should scan every prospective hire and run continued scans on every existing employee.

In other words, they make the case that now that people use social networks, companies will be expected (by shareholders, etc.) to monitor those services and protect the company from lawsuits, damage to reputation, and other harm. And they're probably right.

Second, the company provides reporting that deemphasizes specific actions and emphasizes character. It's less about "what did the employee do" and more about "what kind of person is this employee?"

Because, again, the goal isn't punishment for past behavior but protection of the company from future behavior.

It's all about the future.
[h3]The Future of Predicting the Future[/h3]Predicting future behavior, in fact, is something of a growth industry.
A Cambridge, Mass., company called Recorded Future, which is funded by both Google and the CIA, claims to use its "temporal analytics engine" to predict future events and activities by companies and individual people.

Like Social Intelligence, Recorded Future uses proprietary software to scan all kinds of public web sites, then use some kind of magic pixie dust to find both invisible logical linkages (as opposed to HTML hyperlinks) that lead to likely outcomes. Plug in your search criteria, and the results come in the form of surprisingly accurate future predictions.

Recorded Future is only one of many new approaches to predictive analytics expected to emerge over the next year or two. The ability to crunch data to predict future outcomes will be used increasingly to estimate traffic jams, public unrest, and stock performance. But it will also be used to predict the behavior of employees.

Google revealed last year, for example, that it is developing a search algorithm that can accurately predict which of its employees are most likely to quit. It's based on a predictive analysis of things like employee reviews and salary histories. They simply turn the software loose on personnel records, then the system spits out a list of the people who are probably going to resign soon. (I’m imagining the results laser-etched on colored wooden balls.)
What happens if one of your employees freaks out, comes to work and starts threatening coworkers with a samurai sword? You'll be held responsible because all of the signs of such behavior were clear for all to see on public Facebook pages. That's why you should scan every prospective hire and run continued scans on every existing employee.


This is OD in my opinion.
 
[h1]'Pre-crime' Comes to the HR Dept.[/h1]

In the Steven Spielberg movie Minority Report, police belonging to a special Pre-crime unit arrest people for crimes they would do in the future. It's science fiction, and it will probably never happen in our lifetimes.
However, the pre-crime concept is coming very soon to the world of Human Resources (HR) and employee management.

A Santa Barbara, Calif., startup called Social Intelligence data-mines the social networks to help companies decide if they really want to hire you.

While background checks, which mainly look for a criminal record, and even credit checks have become more common, Social Intelligence is the first company that I'm aware of that systematically trolls social networks for evidence of bad character.

Using automation software that slogs through Facebook, Twitter, Flickr, YouTube, LinkedIn, blogs, and "thousands of other sources," the company develops a report on the "real you" -- not the carefully crafted you in your resume. The service is called Social Intelligence Hiring. The company promises a 48-hour turn-around.

Because it's illegal to consider race, religion, age, sexual orientation and other factors, the company doesn't include that information in its reports. Humans review the reports to eliminate false positives. And the company uses only publically shared data -- it doesn't "friend" targets to get private posts, for example.

The reports feature a visual snapshot of what kind of person you are, evaluating you in categories like "Poor Judgment," "Gangs," "Drugs and Drug Lingo" and "Demonstrating Potentially Violent Behavior." The company mines for rich nuggets of raw sewage in the form of racy photos, unguarded commentary about drugs and alcohol and much more.

The company also offers a separate Social Intelligence Monitoring service to watch the personal activity of existing employees on an ongoing basis. The service is advertised as a way to enforce company social media policies, but given that criteria are company-defined, it's not clear whether it's possible to monitor personal activity.

The service provides real-time notification alerts, so presumably the moment your old college buddy tags an old photo of you naked, drunk and armed on Facebook, the boss gets a text message with a link.

Two aspects of this are worth noting. First, company spokespeople emphasize liability. What happens if one of your employees freaks out, comes to work and starts threatening coworkers with a samurai sword? You'll be held responsible because all of the signs of such behavior were clear for all to see on public Facebook pages. That's why you should scan every prospective hire and run continued scans on every existing employee.

In other words, they make the case that now that people use social networks, companies will be expected (by shareholders, etc.) to monitor those services and protect the company from lawsuits, damage to reputation, and other harm. And they're probably right.

Second, the company provides reporting that deemphasizes specific actions and emphasizes character. It's less about "what did the employee do" and more about "what kind of person is this employee?"

Because, again, the goal isn't punishment for past behavior but protection of the company from future behavior.

It's all about the future.
[h3]The Future of Predicting the Future[/h3]Predicting future behavior, in fact, is something of a growth industry.
A Cambridge, Mass., company called Recorded Future, which is funded by both Google and the CIA, claims to use its "temporal analytics engine" to predict future events and activities by companies and individual people.

Like Social Intelligence, Recorded Future uses proprietary software to scan all kinds of public web sites, then use some kind of magic pixie dust to find both invisible logical linkages (as opposed to HTML hyperlinks) that lead to likely outcomes. Plug in your search criteria, and the results come in the form of surprisingly accurate future predictions.

Recorded Future is only one of many new approaches to predictive analytics expected to emerge over the next year or two. The ability to crunch data to predict future outcomes will be used increasingly to estimate traffic jams, public unrest, and stock performance. But it will also be used to predict the behavior of employees.

Google revealed last year, for example, that it is developing a search algorithm that can accurately predict which of its employees are most likely to quit. It's based on a predictive analysis of things like employee reviews and salary histories. They simply turn the software loose on personnel records, then the system spits out a list of the people who are probably going to resign soon. (I’m imagining the results laser-etched on colored wooden balls.)
What happens if one of your employees freaks out, comes to work and starts threatening coworkers with a samurai sword? You'll be held responsible because all of the signs of such behavior were clear for all to see on public Facebook pages. That's why you should scan every prospective hire and run continued scans on every existing employee.


This is OD in my opinion.
 
No big deal. A less automated process like that already happens all the time. It's called getting a top secret security clearance, but instead of 48 hours like this company says it will take a TS can take over a year depending on the individual. And yes for a TS they will go through the social networking sites and all looking for connections to nefarious people and to see the types of things you are into and yes you are monitored on an ongoing basis as well. 
 
No big deal. A less automated process like that already happens all the time. It's called getting a top secret security clearance, but instead of 48 hours like this company says it will take a TS can take over a year depending on the individual. And yes for a TS they will go through the social networking sites and all looking for connections to nefarious people and to see the types of things you are into and yes you are monitored on an ongoing basis as well. 
 
^Basically...

it's like an e-background check.

and if anyone is worried about what you do.. make your info private.
 
^Basically...

it's like an e-background check.

and if anyone is worried about what you do.. make your info private.
 
--I'll still go for the traditional criminal background check.
--But a credit check and a "e-background" check to determine employment status or hiring? SMH.
 
--I'll still go for the traditional criminal background check.
--But a credit check and a "e-background" check to determine employment status or hiring? SMH.
 
Originally Posted by DARTH DNZY

 --But a credit check and a "e-background" check to determine employment status or hiring? SMH.

how so? easiest (& cheapest) way to determine a knucklehead is through their FB & MP..
 
Originally Posted by DARTH DNZY

 --But a credit check and a "e-background" check to determine employment status or hiring? SMH.

how so? easiest (& cheapest) way to determine a knucklehead is through their FB & MP..
 
Originally Posted by DARTH DNZY

--I'll still go for the traditional criminal background check.
--But a credit check and a "e-background" check to determine employment status or hiring? SMH.
a lot of companies do that anyway.
 
Originally Posted by DARTH DNZY

--I'll still go for the traditional criminal background check.
--But a credit check and a "e-background" check to determine employment status or hiring? SMH.
a lot of companies do that anyway.
 
Originally Posted by Dirtylicious

^Basically...

it's like an e-background check.

and if anyone is worried about what you do.. make your info private.
How do you make your info private? Are you just talking about social networking sites?

Is there a way to hide everything else that I'm not aware of?
 
Originally Posted by Dirtylicious

^Basically...

it's like an e-background check.

and if anyone is worried about what you do.. make your info private.
How do you make your info private? Are you just talking about social networking sites?

Is there a way to hide everything else that I'm not aware of?
 
Yes, I'm referring to social networking sites.

you wouldn't be able to search for my profile on any of the social networking sites by using my name...I use an alias.
I also have my privacy settings set so that only my friends can see my info.

while that won't stop other people from posting pics that have you on their profiles... what you can do is keep up and untag yourself if they tag you
 
Yes, I'm referring to social networking sites.

you wouldn't be able to search for my profile on any of the social networking sites by using my name...I use an alias.
I also have my privacy settings set so that only my friends can see my info.

while that won't stop other people from posting pics that have you on their profiles... what you can do is keep up and untag yourself if they tag you
 
Social networking has shown me sides of people I never knew they had, which has changed my overall perception of them. I dont see why this would be a bad idea for companies to do the same thing.
 
Social networking has shown me sides of people I never knew they had, which has changed my overall perception of them. I dont see why this would be a bad idea for companies to do the same thing.
 
Originally Posted by K2theAblaM

Originally Posted by Dirtylicious

^Basically...

it's like an e-background check.

and if anyone is worried about what you do.. make your info private.
How do you make your info private? Are you just talking about social networking sites?

Is there a way to hide everything else that I'm not aware of?

There is NO way to make your information private. If you want to be truly private, DO NOT USE THESE SITES.

People obligate themselves to sign up then want to complain about their rights. Its THEIR website. Follow their rules or don't use it. I wish people would stop acting surprised like its their "right" to be completely in control of their information. Yes, there are excessive abuses of information you use on these sites that needs to be curtailed but so many people are just really oblivious to what "rights" they actually have.
 
Originally Posted by K2theAblaM

Originally Posted by Dirtylicious

^Basically...

it's like an e-background check.

and if anyone is worried about what you do.. make your info private.
How do you make your info private? Are you just talking about social networking sites?

Is there a way to hide everything else that I'm not aware of?

There is NO way to make your information private. If you want to be truly private, DO NOT USE THESE SITES.

People obligate themselves to sign up then want to complain about their rights. Its THEIR website. Follow their rules or don't use it. I wish people would stop acting surprised like its their "right" to be completely in control of their information. Yes, there are excessive abuses of information you use on these sites that needs to be curtailed but so many people are just really oblivious to what "rights" they actually have.
 
Originally Posted by Dirtylicious

Yes, I'm referring to social networking sites.

you wouldn't be able to search for my profile on any of the social networking sites by using my name...I use an alias.
I also have my privacy settings set so that only my friends can see my info.

while that won't stop other people from posting pics that have you on their profiles... what you can do is keep up and untag yourself if they tag you
Good info. Best way to protect your privacy is to use an alias and an email address to sign up that doesn't include your name.
 
Originally Posted by Dirtylicious

Yes, I'm referring to social networking sites.

you wouldn't be able to search for my profile on any of the social networking sites by using my name...I use an alias.
I also have my privacy settings set so that only my friends can see my info.

while that won't stop other people from posting pics that have you on their profiles... what you can do is keep up and untag yourself if they tag you
Good info. Best way to protect your privacy is to use an alias and an email address to sign up that doesn't include your name.
 
Back
Top Bottom