More than half of the female Marines in boot camp can't do more than 3 pull ups vol. Equality

Didn't read the rest of the thread because I'm sure it was extremely misogynistic and sexist but it's extremely hard for women to obtain upper-body strength. I'm sure the women can handle their own in other ways but it's just 3 pull-ups. Don't see the big deal
 
So should the Broncos bench Peyton and play their bench because they have a better weapon? The hell kind of logic is going on inside of your head? 
laugh.gif
 
 
Here's the logic, people in here are slow. The Peyton analogy was terrible lol, I admit that.

The point I'm making in this thread is modern warfare doesn't require as much brute strength as you think. We use drones, and drop bombs to win wars. Our soldiers aren't any stronger or braver than our enemies.

Make sense?
 
Here's the logic, people in here are slow. The Peyton analogy was terrible lol, I admit that.

The point I'm making in this thread is modern warfare doesn't require as much brute strength as you think. We use drones, and drop bombs to win wars. Our soldiers aren't any stronger or braver than our enemies.

Make sense?
You're sort of all over the place bro. You called the U.S. "dumb and ignorant," but then admitted we win wars by fighting remotely. If anything, it's an advanced tactic, which is NOT a sign of "ignorance."

You also called our military "cowardly" for employing their remote tactics. It almost sounds like you think we should "shoot the fair one" with our enemies. Not how you become a superpower son 
laugh.gif


Forget about technology, we should just roll into the middle east with radio flyers and slingshots 
indifferent.gif


But to agree with you on one point, I never asserted that our soldiers were stronger or braver than anyone. They simply have more resources at their disposal. 
 
What's a "braver" "stronger" soldier? Y'all are just saying things just to talk at this point. Again, stick YOUR neck out for a day, then begin to talk.
 
 
I didnt back pedal, I said modern war is very cowardly and that the US doesn't win because their soldiers are brave.....see where Im going with this....do you see child?
nerd.gif
You did back pedal, and I'm no child. You did it just again right now...saying that "modern war is very cowardly". When originally you said that the U.S. specifically wins with cowardly tactics. Now you wanna include all modern warfare, and not specify the U.S.  It doesn't make the U.S seem cowardly when you say "modern war" as a whole.

So yeah, you're back peddling. I'd say you should edit your posts to make your points seem more legit, but it's too late, as you've already been quoted.
 
 
I've remained consistent with my point this entire thread in saying that war doesn't require as much brute strength as it used to. 
But, like, no sh** 
laugh.gif


It's not the 13th century. You're not exactly making a shocking revelation here bro.
 
Men and women body compositions are different, there is no reason they should have the same physical requirements.
exactly there for they technically cannot do a equal job.... Im all for equality... keyword equality... but making a exception regardless of certain disadvantages etc means that it is no longer equal.
 
thats the key word, equality. for a women to do the exact same thing a man has to physically actually isnt equal for reasons stated. a women actually has to work harder to do the same amount of work.  people hear "less pull ups" and flip a ****.
 
as long as they set a minimum requirement that is reasonable for men and another that is reasonable for women i dont see what the big deal is
 
 
as long as they set a minimum requirement that is reasonable for men and another that is reasonable for women i dont see what the big deal is
true but it still wouldn't be equal per say....aka suppose you doing a job iuno like warehouse and loading a truck based on piecework.... if a man loads 100 50lbs boxes in a truck an hr... and a woman loads 50 15lbs boxes an hr.... Anyway you slice it the amount of workload expected and actually achieved isn't equal. Anyway you try to spin it.

The male counterpart would have a higher productivity rating aka generate more revenue for the company also while costing the company less.... aka be more efficient so how exactly would that be equal?

One person generates twice as much all while costing half as much is equal to a person that is costing the company twice as much and producing half as much. Don't see how that is same/equal.
 
 
Oh so you agree with me that women although not as strong can be effective soldiers? Carry on then, we are on the same page.
wink.gif
it would depend on there mos.... amongst other things... now if it was something like combat arms... or horizontal engineering a few other moss's then no.
 
 
 
as long as they set a minimum requirement that is reasonable for men and another that is reasonable for women i dont see what the big deal is
true but it still wouldn't be equal per say....aka suppose you doing a job iuno like warehouse and loading a truck based on piecework.... if a man loads 100 50lbs boxes in a truck an hr... and a woman loads 50 15lbs boxes an hr.... Anyway you slice it the amount of workload expected and actually achieved isn't equal. Anyway you try to spin it.

The male counterpart would have a higher productivity rating aka generate more revenue for the company also while costing the company less.... aka be more efficient so how exactly would that be equal?

One person generates twice as much all while costing half as much is equal to a person that is costing the company twice as much and producing half as much. Don't see how that is same/equal.
yes then for that job it wouldnt be fair to be a man, however in the army there are jobs that even with the lack of strength, women would be able to do at the same efficiency as a man given the proper training.
 
Get Crossfit girls to enlist. They can do pull ups for days and out do most men.

I know a dude who can barbell curl 135 but can't do 1 pull up.

The measure of strength varies.
 
 
I've remained consistent with my point this entire thread in saying that war doesn't require as much brute strength as it used to. I could duplicate this post if it makes you feel better child.
WRONG. First off...I'm 28 so i'm no child. Secondly, you weren't speaking as generally as you are now. You referred to the U.S. specifically, stating that we won wars through cowardly tactics like dropping bombs. You looked stupid, so now you're back peddling and generalizing/watering down what you originally said by applying your views towards war tactics in general, when you referenced the U.S. explicitly in your original statement. Call me a child all you want, but it's your posts that look juvenile....just sayin.
 
 
LOL a country that wins with cowardly acts like dropping bombs and using drones is complaining about women not being able to pull them out of a ditch?
grin.gif
This is your original statement. Back pedal all you want....but here it is. Blatantly pointing fingers at the U.S. for dropping bombs. This wasn't a statement made generally about war tactics in general. This is a statement referencing U.S. military using explosives, calling the acts cowardly. Lookin foolish right about now. Now you wanna call it "modern warfare" in general. Good luck with that.
 
Back
Top Bottom